Recently I got a Lyman 35891 mold that was HP'd
by Erik.
See link:
http://castboolits.gunloads.com/showthread.php?t=42764
Today I decided to test some of the bullets to see how they would expand in a 5 gallon bucket of wet sand ( I realize that this medium has been criticized already by some here on the forum) lacking any other medium to stop the bullets today, this seemed to be a logical choice.I realize that this test is very un-scientific. I'm certain that if this was done in a ballistics lab that many things would be changed, but since I lack a ballistics lab, I was simply curious as to what would happen with the " wet sand test" ? ?
The " wound cavity " in the wet sand was LARGE !
I also tested the rounds for penetration. One of the rounds loaded with 2.7 B'eye easily penetrated a 3/4 " oak board and almost penetrated a 2nd .
I'm looking for a good self defense round to be fired from a 2 " , 5 shot , J-Frame, 38 Spec. snub that would have good stopping power but not display excessive muzzle blast and excessive recoil. My wife will carry the 2" snub hence the need for her to be able to get back on target with a quick follow up shot if needed.
In the expansion test today, I fired one of the 112 gr. HP's ( Air Cooled WW's ) with 2.7 B'eye, I then repeated the test with the same bullet fired with 3.2 grs. B'eye.
All test rounds were fired from a S & W Model
19, with a 4" barrel with bullets loaded in
38 Spec. brass.
Photos below: