Snyders JerkyReloading EverythingWidenersInline Fabrication
Lee PrecisionRotoMetals2RepackboxLoad Data
MidSouth Shooters Supply Titan Reloading
Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: 94pb / 2sn / 4sb -- Is This A Good Alloy?

  1. #1
    Banned

    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    128

    Question 94pb / 2sn / 4sb -- Is This A Good Alloy?

    The alloy calculator in Reloader's Reference says that this is what I get if I combine two recent lead buys sweetened with one bar each of the 50/50 solder of which I've a small stash.

    Newbie with just two Lee molds so far TL.452-230TC for .45ACP and .358-200RF for reduced loads in several .35 rifles, and per the link I'm going to have to try it as a heavy in .357.

    https://www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...Rtakd3O2OACONG

    From what I've read and watched I look to go without the gas check up to 1500fps. Doable?

  2. #2
    Banned



    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Color Me Gone
    Posts
    8,401
    I want the tin and antimony to be balanced. So 96/2/2 would be real good. And 94/3/3 perfect. What you are proposing would work well.
    Last edited by jmort; 10-24-2016 at 07:48 AM.

  3. #3
    Boolit Grand Master

    dragon813gt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Somewhere in SE PA
    Posts
    9,989
    Tin and Antimony should be balanced. That being said you won't have any issues w/ that alloy. I shot 96/3/1 as an all purpose alloy for years.

  4. #4
    Vendor Sponsor

    Chill Wills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Was-Colorado, Wyoming now
    Posts
    3,196
    What is the reason the Sb and Sn need to be balanced? I have seen info on problems with alloy when the %Sn exceeds the % Sb. But why balanced?
    Chill Wills

  5. #5
    Moderator Emeritus


    JonB_in_Glencoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    15,914
    Why Balanced ?
    because of toughness.

    toughness and hardness are two different things.

    This is a good read.
    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...ntimony-Alloys
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun.”
    ― The Dalai Lama, Seattle Times, May 2001

  6. #6
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    soda springs Id.
    Posts
    28,088
    that would be the old ww alloy with tin thrown in it from the day's of old.
    if you got more soft lead I'd cut that alloy by 25-30% but if you don't it'll shoot just like it did in the 80-90's.

  7. #7
    Vendor Sponsor

    Chill Wills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Was-Colorado, Wyoming now
    Posts
    3,196
    Thank you Jon.
    I have read that.

    But that really does not address the fact that some lesser tin value can't be just as good for many applications. I am vet of the old ago "cast and shoot straight wheel weights" era. In those days I found ways to make the mold fill out and only when I felt spendy did I lay out $$ and effort to add tin.

    Not saying anything is wrong about equal amounts.. not at all.
    Just saying Why is it stated above "Tin and Antimony should be balanced."

    If you have a good alloy like the OP does, why make him think he need to go out and get more tin for what he is doing?

    I don't think it is at all a requirement for successful cast bullet shooting.
    Chill Wills

  8. #8
    Vendor Sponsor

    Chill Wills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Was-Colorado, Wyoming now
    Posts
    3,196
    Quote Originally Posted by runfiverun View Post
    that would be the old ww alloy with tin thrown in it from the day's of old.
    if you got more soft lead I'd cut that alloy by 25-30% but if you don't it'll shoot just like it did in the 80-90's.
    We posted at the same time. BINGO
    My thought too.

    If it were my alloy (for my needs) I would cut it with soft Pb as much as 1 to 1 to make 97-1-2 Pb-Sn-Sb
    But a stiffer mix may be what other like. All fine with me.

    I do not agree that casting bullets requires Balanced to work. Sorry, not trying to start anything. Just putting out info.
    Chill Wills

  9. #9
    Boolit Grand Master OS OK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    El Dorado County, N. Ca.
    Posts
    6,234
    http://www.lasc.us/Fryxell_Book_Contents.htm

    The matrix is a little hard to explain without percentage charts like you'll find in this on line book...it's a 'Casters Bible".

    I suggest you read it...you can't find a better reference.
    a m e r i c a n p r a v d a

    Be a Patriot . . . expose their lies!

    “In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” G. Orwell

  10. #10
    Moderator Emeritus


    JonB_in_Glencoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    15,914
    Quote Originally Posted by Chill Wills View Post
    SNIP...

    I do not agree that casting bullets requires Balanced to work. Sorry, not trying to start anything. Just putting out info.
    No one posted that, if fact, the two members that posted prior to you, stated unbalanced SN-SB alloys will work well, after they posted about balanced alloys.

    I just posted a link to the "why".
    Now, is toughness is better? it's all about the application, some of that is talked about in the link. I shoot all kinds of unknown alloys (that I've measured BHN, so as, to adjust hardness if necessary, but BHN doesn't tell you anything about the alloy and it's toughness), that I've got from misc unknown scrap and it's just fine for plinking or target shooting, and in those situations, it seems like cheapest could very well be the best, right?

    But...I find it valuable to have knowledge...if I were to want the toughest boolit possible, without knowledgeable threads like the one I linked to, I might think that the hardest alloy would be the toughest.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun.”
    ― The Dalai Lama, Seattle Times, May 2001

  11. #11
    Vendor Sponsor

    Chill Wills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Was-Colorado, Wyoming now
    Posts
    3,196
    Quote Originally Posted by jmort View Post
    I want the tin and antimony to be balanced. So 96/2/2 would be real good. And 94/3/3 perfect. What you are proposing would work well.
    Quote Originally Posted by dragon813gt View Post
    Tin and Antimony should be balanced. That being said you won't have any issues w/ that alloy. I shot 96/3/1 as an all purpose alloy for years.
    Originally Posted by Chill Wills
    SNIP...

    I do not agree that casting bullets requires Balanced to work. Sorry, not trying to start anything. Just putting out info.



    Quote Originally Posted by JonB_in_Glencoe View Post
    No one posted that, if fact, the two members that posted prior to you, stated unbalanced SN-SB alloys will work well, after they posted about balanced alloys.
    Sorry but I was responding to what they did post. Yes they also said other alloys work too. I was just asking for them to respond about their point of view about balanced alloy.

    I have read and reread these posts a few times and I agree with everyone. It is my intent to point out as others have that simple or unknown alloy can work. More expense does not always equal better outcome.

    Sorry to get you going if I was not clear. I try hard write with everyones dignity in mind and not condensed to anyone. Respectfully, Michael Rix
    Chill Wills

  12. #12
    Moderator
    RogerDat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Michigan Lansing Area
    Posts
    5,767
    Balanced allows the Sn & Sb to bond with each other which enhances what the two bring to the alloy. Total greater than sum of it's parts. That said if you only need the tin to help provide reduced surface tension for better flow less tin works fine. Lot of folks just add 1/2 - 1 percent tin to COWW's and go to town.

    For an all purpose alloy the stuff with a balance at between 2 and 3 percent Sn/Sb is a good value and performance point. Good for rifles and not wasting a whole lot of alloy when doing pistol. On the other hand lot of pistols will do just fine with 50/50 WW/Pb + between 1% and 2% Sn. You can get about the same pistol material by cutting 3/3/94 with plain about 60/40 or even 50/50 for some molds/calibers. Not sure how that would work with some of the auto loaders but for 38 and 45 seems to work fine. I would think with PC and a gas check it would handle some fairly stout pistol use such as 44 or 357 mag but I tend to use everything from Lyman #2 or that cut 50/50 with Pb or some 2/2/96 I have.

    Point being you have a lot of leeway until you are trying for max performance (accuracy, expansion, range etc.) Hard enough to not lead barrel, soft enough to seal the bore and not scrape the rifling off and there you go! Start with a modest batch, if they shoot well make a whole bunch more just like it. If not re-melt and re-formulate the alloy a touch. Repeat as desired or required.
    Scrap.... because all the really pithy and emphatic four letter words were taken and we had to describe this source of casting material somehow so we added an "S" to what non casters and wives call what we collect.

    Kind of hard to claim to love America while one is hating half the Americans that disagree with you. One nation indivisible requires work.

    Feedback page http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...light=RogerDat

  13. #13
    Banned

    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    128
    Thanks, information and the linked Fryxell and Toughness.

    I'd read Fryxell and I thought that 94/2/4 was close enough to his COWW + tin general purpose alloy.

    The 50/50 I have a small supply of, lead or antimonial lead I have to buy at retail.

    One more bar of solder per pot will put it at very, very close to 92/4/4; which is as close as I can easily get to the consensus recommendation. This will be closing in on Lyman #2, and that can't be a bad sign.

  14. #14
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    down by the bay
    Posts
    367
    Quote Originally Posted by Chill Wills View Post
    Originally Posted by Chill Wills
    SNIP...

    I do not agree that casting bullets requires Balanced to work. Sorry, not trying to start anything. Just putting out info.




    Sorry but I was responding to what they did post. Yes they also said other alloys work too. I was just asking for them to respond about their point of view about balanced alloy.

    I have read and reread these posts a few times and I agree with everyone. It is my intent to point out as others have that simple or unknown alloy can work. More expense does not always equal better outcome.

    Sorry to get you going if I was not clear. I try hard write with everyones dignity in mind and not condensed to anyone. Respectfully, Michael Rix
    ROFL!!! You didn't get him going. That takes a lil bit more then that. TRUST ME, I have 10 infraction points to prove it!!

    L. Bottoms

  15. #15
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    soda springs Id.
    Posts
    28,088
    you don't need a balanced alloy for it to have toughness nor hardness.
    2% tin and 4% antimony is probably some of the toughest alloy available.
    if it had about 0.3% copper added to it, it would be just about perfect as far as a resistant alloy without going to far one way or the other.
    it will resist shear and slumping better than just about any other practical alloy available.
    it's not necessary for almost every application but it is easily producible and it doesn't break the bank to make.
    1 part tin to 2 parts antimony is actually a very good ratio to follow.

  16. #16
    Moderator Emeritus

    MaryB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    SW Minnesota
    Posts
    10,350
    I cast and shoot this exact alloy for targets. Now if I was casting a hunting bullet the mix will be more critical but paper doesn't care! Long as it is hard enough to not come apart when fired, has enough tin to fill the mold well... go for it! Hunting I try for 92/4/4 if I can or even 90/5/5 and that has worked well from my type 53 on deer with good expansion, and as a reduced power load in my 223 for squirrels and rabbits.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check