@HarryO: so the most accurate bullet you're saying is the Old West one they call ".41 Colt 200gr .403dia heel target type mould"? Makes sense with the long bearing surface and just slightly overbore size.
Thinking out loud to myself here: all things being equal, even though clearly lacking the historical value, would a tuned-up Cimarron Lightning be mechanically as good or better than any revolver previously made for the .41, and with somewhat better modern steels? And even a custom Single Six in .41LC (if such is even possible) is unlikely to be any more accurate or in many ways "better" than a Cimarron given that you don't need that Ruger ruggedness since nobody looks to hot-rod a .41LC? The Cimarron doesn't look *exactly* like an 1877 in terms of having the exact same subtle contours of frame and hammer, and of course it's SA only, but broadly speaking an 1877 "pretty much" is a small-frame Peacemaker roughly along the same lines, it's not like it's a totally false facsimile...
I guess at the base of it I'm just looking for a cool sixgun to own for pride of owning something unusual and firing a couple hundred rounds a year, tops. Fundamentally, I like small frame guns, I like big bores (and I cannot lie), and I like unusual cartridges with a backstory. .41LC seems to be about the fattest cartridge you can fit into a Single Six-sized frame (38-40 and .40 S&W would require going to a 5-shot cylinder), and it's certainly unusual. I haven't fully gotten to the "mind made up" stage, and I am prioritizing my re-acquisition of a 6.5 TCU T/C Contender to be my "pocket rifle", but that aside I'm leaning heavily to calling up distributors maybe next month to see if I can have a 4-5" .41 Lightning waiting for me at my LGS when I return to Austin from West Africa.