Originally Posted by
rintinglen
Speaking to the reason why I prefer the CM380 to the Seecamp 380. First, the Seecamp uses its mainspring to supplement the function of the recoil spring, which makes for a very stout trigger pull. The trigger weight, combined with the very light weight of the gun, makes the pistol hard to control. The Seecamp also is kind of slippery, which combined with its very small size, makes it shift around in my hand when fired. Finally, it has no sights. If you have to use it at any distance greater than long knife range, you better be lucky, if you hope to hit anything.
The Kahr is slightly larger, has a better trigger and has sights. You can use it out to fifteen yards and be confident of the results. The polymer frame has molded checkering that gives a firmer grip, which combined with the somewhat greater size, gives more control. Neither is particularly easy to rack the slide on, and either is likely to be a bit picky about ammo choices. And they weigh almost exactly the same. The Kahr runs about 280 dollars less than the Seecamp.
Unless you really need an ultra-compact pistol to hide in your jockstrap, I'd go with the Kahr.
Truth in advertising laws, though, compel me to stare that I carry an LCP for the purpose of very light weight concealment.