RotoMetals2MidSouth Shooters SupplyLee PrecisionTitan Reloading

Donate Now Goal amount for this year: 4000 USD, Received: 1570 USD (39%)
Our Annual server fund drive is going on now! This donation drive helps fund Cast Boolits for an entire year, and helps support our 2nd amendment rights! You can donate by Paypal by clicking the DONATE button. Or by Cash / Check / MO to the address below:

Willy Snyder
PO Box 2732
Pocatello, ID 83206


Page 570 of 570 FirstFirst ... 70470520560561562563564565566567568569570
Results 11,381 to 11,387 of 11387

Thread: My homemade black powder

  1. #11381
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Mar 2024
    Location
    Northwoods
    Posts
    48
    As you guys have noted with your finished powder im getting 1g/cc to 1.03g/cc loading density.

  2. #11382
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    3,977
    Quote Originally Posted by PianoManA440 View Post
    As you guys have noted with your finished powder im getting 1g/cc to 1.03g/cc loading density.
    0.95 unpolished corned FFg --this stuff has given me single digit extreme spread numbers and velocity approaching swiss and I aint messin with that!

    0.8 unpolished Screened FFFg

  3. #11383
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Northwest Arkansas
    Posts
    1,151
    PianoManA440;
    How are you getting 1.7 grams per cc of density at the puck, using 8% moisture and not losing any moisture? I've never been able to press even a 1.6 g/cc puck using more than 4% moisture. And, I've never pressed a 5% puck that didn't lose some moisture. Are you counting the moisture weight, in the equation you're using, or subtracting it, first?
    I think TrapperJack is pressing pucks around .8 g/cc using high moisture, and then gaining back loaded density through the rest of his procedure. In the one test I did, I got the same results from the high moisture, low pressure pucks, of not over .8 density.

  4. #11384
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Mar 2024
    Location
    Northwoods
    Posts
    48
    Yes the water is included. (Example say my die holds 100 grams of volume.
    So that would be 92 grams of bp and 8 grams of water.) Just checking my numbers looks like im pressing too
    1.68. Also my scale is accurate to half a gram. The water scale is accurate to 1/20 of a grain.
    My rams/pistons are wood. So could be that the wood absorbs some. That and my
    measurements may be slightly off.

  5. #11385
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Northwest Arkansas
    Posts
    1,151
    It's all good. If the water weight is included, I get it. I just go by dry weight and couldn't figure it out.

  6. #11386
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    3,977
    you fellers are better organised than me ! if I tried to measure puck density I would not trust the answer I got - so I dont bother with it - the only measure I do is finished powder and compared to commercial...........................

  7. #11387
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Northwest Arkansas
    Posts
    1,151
    indian joe;
    I understand and I see nothing wrong with using loaded density. You're not testing a lot of different charcoals. Measuring at the puck, you can adjust the powder's density before you are left with only loaded density, what ever it is.
    I try to get 1.65 +or- density on every batch, for consistency. Most of my powders, with my measures, will throw a 1/1 weight/volume at that density. And, again, that is only important if you're using different charcoals and trying to keep everything heads up, to test with. If the density is uniform, it's just one less variable that can make results somewhat unreliable.
    After measuring several 10's of pucks, it is second hand to me, now. Since I had the HDPE spacers made, my puck thickness only varies by about .002", if I load the die correct. I measure them in the middle and four around; average them and they come out real close.
    Plus, I measure my water, so I know how much, near exact, is in the powder. That way, I only have to deduct the moisture weight when I measure a puck for density, to know real close; what that loaded density SHOULD be. It's not perfect, and I don't claim it to be. But, I try to make every batch equal on density to rule that out on opposing charcoal tests. As Forrest Gump said, "It's just one less thing."
    Good to see you post! You need to quit lurking in the shadows!!!

Page 570 of 570 FirstFirst ... 70470520560561562563564565566567568569570

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check