RepackboxRotoMetals2MidSouth Shooters SupplySnyders Jerky
Titan ReloadingWidenersLee PrecisionInline Fabrication
Load Data
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Lee 430-310/Lee QC BULLSHXX

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    359

    Lee 430-310/Lee QC BULLSHXX

    It seems that this is a popular mold. Has anyone had problems with them?
    I just cast a bunch from a brand new one and they wouldn't even touch the 430 sizer,a quick caliper check showed .425 to .427
    This makes 3 *** molds I have recieved from Lee. I HAD a 357 SWC 6 banger that dropped from 355 to 359,that is in the bottom of my pond. A 325 grain 475 mold that dropped 472.
    This **** is aggravating and getting really old.
    And BTW this one is going to go back to LEE and I have never had an issue with their customer service,but the need to send it back in the first place is very very irritating.

  2. #2
    Boolit Grand Master
    Ben's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Cleveland, AL
    Posts
    9,260
    What kind of alloy are you using ?

  3. #3
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    359
    COWW.
    Same alloy I use in 90% of my stuff.

  4. #4
    bhn22
    Guest
    The best warranty available is the one you never have to use.

  5. #5
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    870
    I recently purchased 2 of LEE's newest designed double cavity 8MM moulds. Having never been a LEE mould fan because of prior experiences with the original designs, I felt the new pin-and-socket style deserved a fair chance.
    One mould actually casts reasonably well, dropping projectiles that measure within specs and look like they may have potential (I haven't had the opportunity to push any downrange, yet).
    The second mould is useless. The blocks aren't even close to matching. It's impossible for me to believe the two halves were cut together, the misalignment is that bad.
    The vendor's FedEx return lable arrived yesterday, and they've offered to refund or personally inspect a replacement. I excepted the replacement offer because I'm confident it WILL actually go through a "Quality Control" check...although not by anyone at LEE.
    You get what you pay for. It's that simple.

    Although the only plus I can possibly recommend when discussing LEE moulds is their price, then hope you get lucky, I can say that their "commercial mould" handles are a decent value. They do tend to need the wood epoxied to stay in place, but that's no biggie.
    I also find the "Factory Crimp" dies useful in several different rifle calibers.

  6. #6
    Boolit Master
    Newtire's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Star, Idaho
    Posts
    2,931
    Quote Originally Posted by cainttype View Post


    I can say that their "commercial mould" handles are a decent value. They do tend to need the wood epoxied to stay in place, but that's no biggie.
    The Automotive High Temp silicon sealer for gaskets squirted into the hole and then shove the handle back on has never come loose for me. I pinned a few but that weakens the handles.

  7. #7
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    6,213
    The blocks are not cut together like they used to be on a lathe. Now they are cut seperately on a CNC milling machine with a cutter.

    The 44 310gr boolit mold is sensitive to too much heat, both the 2 and 6 cavity. This goes for the 45 cal 300 gr also. Try dropping the pot temperature down or slowing the rate of casting. Too much heat and they come out small.

  8. #8
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,389
    Your consistently smaller than nominal diameter with several different moulds is saying the moulds aren't the problem. Probably not necessary to send the mould back to Lee.

    Try adding 2% tin to the COWWs. Most commercial moulds are not spec'd for that alloy but with one with more tin. All COWWs are not the same, especially newer ones; they are notoriously low in tin and don't have the antimony content they used to have either.

    Also with colder weather and many times colder casting areas the alloy cools a lot before you get it into the cavity, especially when dipper pouring. Even if using a bottom pour furnace it is necessary to get the alloy into the cavity very quickly and leave a very good sprue. An alloy temp of 725+/- is a good temp with larger bullets. the fluctuation of .002 in bullet diameter is a good indication the alloy is to cool to fill the mould out before solidifying. Be careful, as leadman says, not to over heat the mould as that can also cause the problem.

    Larry Gibson

  9. #9
    Boolit Master

    pworley1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    3,275
    I have that mold and have never had a problem with it. I am sorry that you are.
    NRA Benefactor Member NRA Golden Eagle

  10. #10
    Boolit Master
    Bohica793's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    LA (Lower Alabama)
    Posts
    682
    I have to agree with OP. I have two of the new style molds - a 452-200RF and a 452-255RF. I have attempted to cast these with 20-1 and with WW+2%. Neither one drops a round that my Lyman 45 .452 sizer touches. I use the same alloys with my Lyman 452-374 and it drops .453-.454 consistently. My Lyman 358XXX molds drop 358-360 consistently. I run the aluminum molds hot and the alloy around 750. I sent the 452-255RF back and Andy swears it meets spec, but you couldn't prove it by me. I will be sticking to Lyman and NOE molds from now on.

  11. #11
    Boolit Master ACrowe25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    535
    I disagree on the alloy. I use nothing but COWW and my boolits all drop perfectly as stated by the mfg,'even in that exact mold.

    Either your calipers are wrong... Not a very precise tool for the job IMO. Do you have micrometers?

    Cast 10 boolits from the same cavity and measure all 10. If not consistent, I don't suspect lee is the problem.

  12. #12
    Vendor Sponsor

    DougGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    just above Raleigh North Carolina
    Posts
    7,434
    Well, if it falls through a .430" sizer, it certainly ain't the calipers!

  13. #13
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    359
    I DO NOT need a caliper when I can push 25 of them into the sizer and the come back down on the ram.
    As for alloy and temp I was also at the same time casting 358456's and using a Ranch Dog 41 mag Lee mold.
    I might also mention that I have 5 Ranch Dog Lee molds and 4 other "production" molds",that have never given me problem.
    I guess I have a mind set,given my job, that when something leaves it is perfect.
    Alloy was at 700 deg. +/-
    I will try dropping alloy temp and casting a few out of curiosity. Thanks for the info.

  14. #14
    Boolit Master dkf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Pa
    Posts
    1,555
    This group buy is over but the call for payment has not been made yet. You may be able to get an extra if you PM Mihec. Expensive mold but worth it.

    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...v-brass-cramer

  15. #15
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    359
    Thanks dkf. I PM'd him.
    I already have 5 MiHec molds and 25 more wouldn't bother me one bit.

  16. #16
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    40
    I have the Lee C430 - 310RF new. Cast for the first time today, most were not keepers, but thats due to my technique I think. 680° to 715° was what the pot was running. Did not preheat the mold, but ran about 15 cycles thru before getting good bullets. The good ones mic 0.432". Also cast with the 429-240 tumble lube mold and got about 275 decent bullets. Culled about 25 with poor fill and wrinkles, after about 15 drops to warm the mold. I got to get a hot plate.
    None of this meant to be critical of your technique, just comparing notes. I'm not qualified to critisize anyone, as I cast my first ever boolits today. Starting with the Lee molds due to cost.

  17. #17
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    347
    Sticking with RCBS, SAECO, and Lyman molds has worked well for me............

  18. #18
    Boolit Master
    Jailer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Ithaca, MI
    Posts
    1,847
    I had one of the new style and it cast undersize as well. I say had because I ruined it trying to lap it open enough to be usable.

  19. #19
    Boolit Master
    Bullwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Reno, Nevada
    Posts
    1,136
    I purchased one of the new style Lee C430-310-RF moulds with the intention of milling the Gas Check shank off and turning it into Plain Base design.



    LEFT
    Boolit with GasCheck shank weight 282 grains cast from my mix of Mono/Linotype.

    RIGHT
    PB (Plain Base) boolit weight 265 grains cast from 50% pure lead - 50% hardball.

    NOT PICTURED
    Boolit with GC shank cast from 50% pure lead - 50% hardball alloy weight 306 grains with no gas check installed.

    Maybe I got lucky, but my Lee C430-310-RF is a keeper and does not cast undersize boolits when used in conjunction with my alloy. I do not/have not cast with this mould using straight Wheel Weight lead.

    The mould did have a bit of a learning curve to it before obtaining any successful casts without a high reject rate.

    I am not disparaging anyone else's casting methods or results here, just repeating my experiences.

    The mould needed to be run extremely hot with a quick casting cadence to obtain a decent fill out. I was even using an electric hotplate as a pre-warmer with this mould, and it still took a good while to warm up. This was the most cold blooded mould I think I've used in a while. I thought it worth mentioning as I took the time to make a note of it, and put the note in the box with the mould blocks so I won't have the pleasure of relearning this little quirk during my next casting session.


    Boolits drop from my mould at .433 when cast from straight lino/monotype.

    Boolits cast at .432 from my certified (rotometals) mix of 50% pure lead - 50% hardball alloy.



    - Bullwolf
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 44 TL WC Mockup.JPG   44 TL WC Loaded.JPG   Lee 429-208WC #90334.JPG   429-208WC Squish.JPG   429-208WC Soft & Mono.JPG  

    Load Block 44spl.jpg   44 Spl Boolits.jpg   44 Special PB.jpg   Hand Lubing BAC & C-Red.jpg  
    Last edited by Bullwolf; 05-17-2017 at 08:45 PM.

  20. #20
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    41
    I am not impressed with Lee CS at all, worst in the industry and worse than most computer and electronics companies. However having gotten a number of Lee molds that were obviously defective just by looking at them (they shear the aluminum off and one had a huge chunk ripped off the side they decided to use as the top so there was a giant V running across/through the top of the mold, the others were horribly misaligned when you looked at them), Lee did replace them for me. Not happily or quickly, but they did finally send me different molds. Lee CS was never good and it seems to be getting worse. I do like their dies however and have not had any problems with them (yet).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check