MidSouth Shooters SupplyWidenersInline FabricationLoad Data
RepackboxTitan ReloadingSnyders JerkyRotoMetals2
Lee Precision
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 39 of 39

Thread: First time casting and powder coating *Pic heavy*

  1. #21
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Can't-Wait-To-Leave NJ
    Posts
    529
    For my 9mm guns and that bullet, I use oal of 1.060, except the LC9 which needs 1.090. Just use your barrel and do the "plunk" test. It will tell you exactly what the correct length needs to be. Yours may be different than anyone elses. Also, based on your first bullet photo, it looks like it could use a little better fill out, which may explain why you only get .356 after sizing...perhaps too small to begin with. What size do they drop at?

  2. #22
    Boolit Master




    EMC45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    East TN Mountains...Thanks be to God!
    Posts
    4,552
    I would seat till about 30 thou shows of the front band, size to .358 and crimp just enough to remove the "bell" from the case mouth. Crimp to where the case walls are straight all the way to the end. That's just me though.....
    You can miss fast & you can miss a lot, but only hits count.

  3. #23
    Boolit Man jacobslagle018's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    75
    As far as powders go I only have HS-6 and Longshot right now. Supplies are still really tight where I live. Lyman 49th has a load for HS-6 but the OAL said it needed to be 1.110. Should I just use the min load it has listed as a start?

  4. #24
    Boolit Buddy sirAIG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    State College, PA
    Posts
    133
    If it were me, I'd drop my starting load 1 or 2 tenths of a grain. But even at the min load, you should be okay
    Actively looking for anything SKS/7.62x39 related. PM me!

  5. #25
    Boolit Grand Master popper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,609
    You could go~ 0.01-0.015 longer without problem. I use 231, not HS6 but I would start at the low jacket load.
    Whatever!

  6. #26
    Boolit Master
    xacex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    2,030
    I just looked at my load data, and some I had loaded up from a couple of years ago. The COAL I have been using on those is 1.060". Fed in all the 1911's, glocks, ect. I have tried them in. I to noticed you may not be casting hot enough. The lower drive band on the one that was not coated is rounded. It should be sharp. Dont worry if they are a little frosty. It helps the powder coat stick.

  7. #27
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    233
    Have to concur with deeper.. and I was hinting at that yesterday.. probably what would be best is to just keep backing the die down in small increments until you get it smooth. ESPECIALLY in 9mm the largest OAL that will work (in all of your guns or) gun is the best bet for accuracy and pressure... But it still looks good.. should work well when you get it all figured out too....

  8. #28
    Boolit Buddy sirAIG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    State College, PA
    Posts
    133
    Not to hijack this thread, but can you briefly explain why the longest OAL you can run is best for 9mm in all applications?
    Actively looking for anything SKS/7.62x39 related. PM me!

  9. #29
    Boolit Master
    xacex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    2,030
    Quote Originally Posted by sirAIG View Post
    Not to hijack this thread, but can you briefly explain why the longest OAL you can run is best for 9mm in all applications?
    Reducing the jump from throat to lands affects accuracy, but with semi auto pistols it is a balance between what guns you would be using the cartridge in, reliability, and accuracy. With rifles you want to be .001 to .005 off of the lands for best accuracy, but in a semi auto pistol that is not always possible. Reducing the jump reduces the chance that the bullet tips as it is released by the neck, and enters the rifling straight. For short range work, and plinking this kind of accuracy is completely unnecessary. Frankly, most of the time I don't worry about it and work at an OAL that will work in all of my guns reliably, but that means my accuracy drops to over 1" at 7 yards or 21 feet.
    Last edited by xacex; 02-05-2014 at 08:16 PM.

  10. #30
    Boolit Master


    Walter Laich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cypress, Republic of Texas
    Posts
    3,507
    FWIW: I load my non-coated TC bullets a bit deeper than the first pictures. I load at the lower (-est) end of the table just enough powder for plinking loads--getting too old and carpal tunnel took the hot load off the table.
    NRA Life
    USPSA L1314
    SASS Life 48747
    RVN/Cambodia War Games, 2nd Place

  11. #31
    Boolit Master
    Bullwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Reno, Nevada
    Posts
    1,136
    Judging by your pictures, that Lee TC bullet needs to be seated a tad lower until it will easily pass a plunk test in your pistol barrel.




    I saw a great example of this interference fit from an Image on the CZ forums. I'm going to borrow and re-paste that image here.




    I use a different TC bullet (Lyman 356402) for 9mm than the Lee one, and I can seat it out at 1.15 with no problems in my 9mm pistols.



    However that Lyman design is a bit narrower than the Lee TC design. The Lee boolit often requires a somewhat deeper seating to function reliably as you are finding out.

    You are learning that your pistol is the final judge of the correct loaded overall cartridge length, more so than a go or no go gauge.



    - Bullwolf

  12. #32
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    233
    When I started to load 9mm, I noticed that using book OAL's would occasionally give me high pressure signs in one of my guns.. going to plunk test minus 0.001" or so fixed that issue. I have started to work up from max OAL that will chamber in all of my guns for every caliber now, and notice that the accuracy is a lot better and I've never seen "pressure signs". The odd thing is that I was nowhere near max.

    My comment on 9mm.. and many more experienced might just say "newbie".. is that.. it's... well.. touchy compared to other calibers and when you see grains of powder vs. case size, etc.. that 9mm is .. a little more delicate than most other calibers.. the sizing OAL to the chamber in my experience (limited compared to many here).. seems to make the process that much more easy and scientific..

    Your mileage might vary here... I also tend to use "fast" powders like W231 and Bullseye and I've been considering trying other types for my powder coated 9mm's once things warm up...

  13. #33
    Boolit Master OBXPilgrim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    610
    Pulled my loading data notebook out to have a look. Lee 120gr TC is the only 9mm I could get to shoot accurately in a Glock 26. OAL was 1.055"
    Avatar - 2006, my oldest son (6'2"), trying to lift the 95lb Cobia he caught at Cape Hatteras, NC from the beach.

  14. #34
    Boolit Master flashhole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Azle, TX
    Posts
    919
    Quote Originally Posted by sirAIG View Post
    In my opinion, reloading manuals are good for a baseline, but my ammo hardly ever meets the OAL specs. I ran into similar problems using the Lee 175TC mold for 40sw. I ended up seating my boolit deeper and the issues stopped. I'm not saying disregard the reloading manual, but I starting learning the most when I start venturing into he unknowns
    Same issue, same bullet, same fix on my 40 S&W. The slight (~.012") protrusion of the shoulder above the case was causing feed problems. Seating it a bit deeper so the shoulder was flush to the case having only the cone above the case rim eliminated the problem.
    ,,, stupidity comes to some people very easily. 8/22/2017 Pat Lengyel (my wife) in a discussion about Liberals.

  15. #35
    Boolit Man jacobslagle018's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    75
    I went to shoot a mag of these today. Im glad to report all appendages are still here. These were actually super accurate loads. I didnt think to keep the target but I will post one next time I shoot. Thanks agani for all of the help!

  16. #36
    Boolit Buddy sirAIG's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    State College, PA
    Posts
    133
    I'm glad everything worked well for you! Did you say at the minimum load data for that boolit?
    Actively looking for anything SKS/7.62x39 related. PM me!

  17. #37
    Boolit Master
    garym1a2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Green Cove springs Florida
    Posts
    2,015
    I use 1.06 for this one also as longer does not work in some of my barrels.

  18. #38
    Boolit Man jacobslagle018's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    75
    I ended up going to 1.045 for my oal. Any longer didnt want to fit. I used 5.1 grains of longshot for the powder. This is an amazing load for me. Couldnt have done it without the help from everyone here!

  19. #39
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    32
    I am using that same mold and that is how deep I am seating mine. I have no problem with that depth in either of my Springfield 9mm(XD and XDs). Accuracy is still great for me at that depth.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check