Lee PrecisionInline FabricationLoad DataTitan Reloading
Snyders JerkyRepackboxRotoMetals2MidSouth Shooters Supply
Wideners
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: gas check vs no gas check test

  1. #1
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    33

    gas check vs no gas check test

    Today I tested some 30-30 ammo in my Ruger #1.
    This test proves nothing. I just wanted to see what would happen and thought some people here might be interested in my results.

    I wanted to see the results of using gas checks vs no gas checks and the difference in using LLA unsized bullets without gas checks vs sized with no gas checks. All bullets were from the same casting session. All ammo was loaded the same day. Bullets were not weighed or sorted just visually inspected before lubing.

    All shots were 5 shot groups 100 yards off bench rest. 43 degrees se wind 10 mph

    Rifle is a Ruger #1 30-30 with a Hart stainless barrel. 6X24 BSA platinum scope.

    Saeco 316 with gas check sized .3095 lubed with carnuba red
    6.5 grains Promo
    win. lg. rifle primer

    4 groups avg. 1.6 inches

    vel. avg. 1158fps
    es 66
    sd 14

    Saeco 316 unsized lubed with LLA
    6.5 Promo
    win lg. rifle primer

    4 groups avg. 1.9 inches

    vel. avg. 1239
    es 60
    sd 10

    Saeco 316 sized .3095 lubed with carnuba red .no gas check
    6.5 Promo
    win. lg. rifle primer

    3 groups ( one group had shooter error so I did not use it ) avg. 2.0 inches
    vel.avg. 1129
    es 53
    sd 13

  2. #2
    Boolit Buddy ButterNutZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    BlueGrass
    Posts
    154
    Good work jsam. I wonder why the velocity figure is that much higher on Alox unsized bullets. Is that because fatter bullet created more resistance and bummed up the pressure? Or maybe alox is not as slick creating more friction and raising the pressure?
    How did you feel about the groups? I know you posted that checked they are a bit tighter, but if you had to pick one over the other which one you would go with?

  3. #3
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    1,084
    It's nice to see someone post just some raw data. You know, take it or leave it, with no assertions, just here is what I found by my experiment. Good work.

  4. #4
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    33
    Butternutz, I wont pretend to understand why the velocity figures turned out as they did.
    When I load ammo I always think it will shoot 5 shot 1 inch groups average at 100 yards. So far I l have always been disappointed. I have shot SOME 1 inch groups but nothing that will average 1 inch or less every time. I thought these groups were good not great. My primary goal is to shoot ,have fun, and possibly learn something along the way. With this bullet and powder I wont spend the extra money or time to use gas checks. LLA is faster and easier so for fun off hand shooting I find it good enough.
    There are so many possible combinations of bullets and powders for this rifle I will probably never stop trying different things. Perhaps some day I will find the perfect combination. I hope it takes years and thousands of rounds of ammo because the journey is more fun that arriving to the destination.

  5. #5
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Queen Charlotte Islands
    Posts
    294
    Don't worry, no one to date has found the perfect combination. You'll be a long time arriving. Sounds like you've got a fine rifle to do it with. Best of luck.
    If it was me, I'd try some other powders(about 14 - 16gr of H110 or2400 to start) and look for good information on bedding.
    Grouch

  6. #6
    Boolit Grand Master popper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,614
    jsam - I'm getting about 1.5x0.9"@50 in a 336 ~15-1600 fps, 16 gr. 2400 with filler. No check on a Accurate 31-165 that has a single groove . Same load, my RD311 multi-groove didn't do very well w/o GC but about 1" with GC ~2k fps. Cull out any that don't have a well filled rear band.
    Whatever!

  7. #7
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Spring Hill, KS
    Posts
    38
    Good experiment. I like seeing the raw data.

    I was surprised the unsized LLA had a higher velocity.

    It would be interesting to repeat the experiment, maybe with another rifle, and see if the velocity difference between sized and unsized was that noticeable and also if the gas checks consistently produced better average groups.

  8. #8
    Boolit Master scattershot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    1,554
    Thanks for the timely info. I'm just starting to experiment with the 30/30 and cast boolits, and plan to use that very load.

    Once again, thanks.
    "Experience is a series of non-fatal mistakes"


    Disarming is a mistake free people only get to make once...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check