LOL for me its you guys have a very good imaganation.
In that if a 4 ingredient formula does not work then chuck that and make a whole new 7 ingredient formula or 6 or 5. When that does not work lets add some of this or that cause it sound good.
This thread is great do not get me wrong but the haphazard and non double or tripple reviewed nature as well as no real spelled out peramiters for the lube (other than if has to shoot hot and cold) to me means while this is fun it will never end.
In my work for various lube I can have 2-10 problems area or isues that the lube must overcome have to be worked out same as this boolit lube.
I will break it down into managable bits such as first get the vis correct or start with the EP load carrying or low temp etc. Just one area say low temp when that is soved move on.
Then as 1 action item is met I move on till the formula on paper looks good and meets
all my imposed criteria with lab testing data on NOT the whole but on the "bits" of action items that must be met.
Then the field testing is started to prove or disporve the formula. This takes months to years and as information comes back from the field testing modification are made to dial it in.
Unfortunatelt boolit llube has not many applicable ASTM lubes tests that apply.
As such you have to shoot stuff but how do you know that the falure you have was due to visocity or lube value or melting point etc.
Seems like way to many varibles here.
But I love this stuff so continue on and I will assist any way I can
Not complaining just random thoughts
bruce