Reloading EverythingSnyders JerkyInline FabricationMidSouth Shooters Supply
WidenersRotoMetals2Titan ReloadingLee Precision
Load Data Repackbox
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 56

Thread: Which luber?

  1. #1
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Wenatchee, Washington
    Posts
    540

    Which luber?

    Found a RCBS luber (not sure if it's the first or second model) for $120 brand new. I don't see myself casting tens of thousands of boolits, although the Star is a nice unit. What I would like to know is, are boolits "really" much more accurate if sized nose first? If they are the Magma is for me. I don't like launching things downrange unless I know I can hit them, and I HATE inaccurate ammo. I'd really appreciate your opinions. I have pretty much ruled out the Lyman 450/4500based on opinions of others I have read elsewhere.

    Thanks fellas!

    Kevin
    History will record, with the greatest astonishment, that those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.

    The problem with Liberals is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so.

    - Ronald Reagan

  2. #2
    Boolit Buddy steveb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    415
    I have the RCBS LubOmatic 2 and like it real well.
    [SIGPIC]http://i104.photobucket.com/albums/m193/stevensavage/avatars/reloadnPalacescriptresized.jpg[/SIGPIC]

  3. #3
    In Remembrance


    DLCTEX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Eastern panhandle,Tx
    Posts
    6,255
    I have both RCBS and Lyman Sizers, And can't say I prefer one over the other. The RCBS does have a beefier Handle mechanisim, but the Lyman has done many thousands of bullets for me, and I bought it used, without a hitch(it's a 45). I prefer it's ratchet handle for lube pressure as compared to the little 2 knob handle on the RCBS. Otherwise they use the same dies and nose guides.

  4. #4
    44woody
    Guest

    lubers

    RVPILOT76 I have had a rcbs lub-a-matic-2 and now own a star I used to have the worst problem with lube on the base of my bullets I would spend hr's cleaning it off the base I finly was able to get a star and sold the lam2 and have not regreted it everrcbs warenty v magma warenth that is a no braner rcbs has the best if it breaks for any reason your fanle or the cat's fault rcbs will fix it this is just my 2 cents worth 44Woody

  5. #5
    Boolit Mold ssgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Polk Co Florida
    Posts
    19
    I use an RCBS,a new Lyman and an old Lyman 45. The all seem to work equally well. Lately though, Ive started picking up the Lee sizers. I think these may be my new favorites.

  6. #6
    Boolit Master wills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    La Grange,Texas
    Posts
    2,127
    I used a highly scientific and organized approach to the selection of a lube-sizer. After much careful deliberation and research I bought one someone happened to have at the range to sell, with the correct size die already installed and about half full of SPG.
    Have mercy.
    A haw, haw, haw, haw, a haw.
    A haw, haw, haw

  7. #7
    Boolit Master Maven's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    4,954
    Kevin, Until the Lee sizer dies came out, all of my CB's were sized base-first in a Lyman #450 and 2 RCBS Lub-A-Matics. In fact, the tiny .45-70 group I described last week used CB's sized base-first in a Lub-A-Matic. If the ram and die are properly aligned and you don't bend the bullets when sizing them, I don't think there's much difference between the two methods. Just my $0.02

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    8,099
    I'll add my .02 cents to Maven's and make it .04 cents. I've experienced the same thing he has. One thing I might add, I like the base type luber/sizers better because lubing with the Lee push throughs is so inconvienant to lubing.

    Joe

  9. #9
    Boolit Master



    Springfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Jose, California
    Posts
    3,685
    For the 60 bucks get the Star. I had an old Lyman 45 and an RCBS, almost new. After I got the first Star I sold them both. Now I have 3 Stars. Yes, I size thousands of bullets a month, but the price difference really isn't that great. I just don't have that much free time and I hate to waste it to save 60 bucks on something that is going to last until I die in 40 years. Yes, the Lyman and RCBS did a decent job of sizing. But so does my single stage RCBS press work well, but I almost never use it, I use the Dillon 550. If you have a Dillon progressive press than you are probably a Star kind of guy. IMHO

  10. #10
    Boolit Master omgb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,628
    I have the RCBS LAM II and a Star and an old Lachmiller LAM I . I use the RCBS and lachmiller for short runs and experimenting. If I'm doing a large batch of 100 or more bullets i go to the Star. Dies for the Star are more expensive but the machine is by far faster to use. So, if you shoot a few rifle but hundreds of pistol rounds, then the Star is the way to go.
    R J Talley
    Teacher/James Madison Fellow

  11. #11
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    170
    I shoot a lot of handgun bullets so when I cast, I cast a lot of bullets. Have found the Star lubrisizer the ideal tool as the bullets go in nose first, get lubed and sized, and exit the bottom of the die. Each pull of the handle produces a sized and lubricated bullet. Fastest lubrisizer on the market. Never have to consider using another lubrisizer as all sizing sessions involves lots of bullets. The Star is built to commercial standards so expect years of trouble-free performance. Just my dos centavos.

  12. #12
    Boolit Master
    Bent Ramrod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Southern Arizona
    Posts
    4,299
    Back in the Thirties the prevailing idea in the gun literature was that nose first sizing damaged bases, bent bullets and caused all kinds of grief to the hapless cast bullet shooter. These denunciations had the effect of causing everybody to junk their tong tools and push-through sizers and buy Ideal or later brands of base-first sizer/lubricators. Now we've gone full circle and base first is the "only" way to go again.

    There was also the argument that the tong type tools made inferior ammunition because the handles didn't move in a "straight line."

    Like the perennial .270-vs-.30-06 argument, the purpose of these is to sell the commodity in question and also sell the publications wherein the arguments are staged.

    I have a Lachmiller, a Lyman 45, a couple Pacific base-first dies and I sometimes use a Kake Cutter and size through the push die or the hole in the handle of a tong tool. If the bullet is started straight in any of them, the accuracy appears to be equivalent.

  13. #13
    Boolit Master omgb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,628
    I agree with Bentramrod. Accuracy from either the RCBS/Lachmiller tools or the Star seems to be the same. Only the speed of production is different
    R J Talley
    Teacher/James Madison Fellow

  14. #14
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    south western pennsylvina
    Posts
    3,414
    had them all! star is the best way to go !!!!!!! cost a little more but well worth it! any one who i let try my star has bought one, so far ive converted 5 other casters, as for accuracy 1 1/4 for 25 shots at 100 yards with a rpm xl and 2 1/2 inches for 25 shots at 200 yards for a browning bpcr . bob

  15. #15
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Wenatchee, Washington
    Posts
    540
    Well, looks like the Star is getting the nod. Thanks for all of your input, fellas!

    My best to all,

    Kevin
    History will record, with the greatest astonishment, that those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.

    The problem with Liberals is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so.

    - Ronald Reagan

  16. #16
    Boolit Man
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    78
    Hello;
    I see you say for 120$ you can get the luber, but at midway for 128$ you could get the luber, a melting pot, a ladel, an ingot mould and the Lyman cast bullet book.

  17. #17
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Wenatchee, Washington
    Posts
    540
    Quote Originally Posted by xpshooter
    Hello;
    I see you say for 120$ you can get the luber, but at midway for 128$ you could get the luber, a melting pot, a ladel, an ingot mould and the Lyman cast bullet book.
    Link?
    History will record, with the greatest astonishment, that those who had the most to lose, did the least to prevent its happening.

    The problem with Liberals is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so.

    - Ronald Reagan

  18. #18

  19. #19
    Boolit Master At Heavens Range 1945-2008 brshooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Waddington, NY
    Posts
    122
    I used a lyman for 2 years and was always wiping the base of the bullets, what a pain in bucket. Bought a Star Lubricator in 1963 and have never looked back. First dies had fitted nose punchs for the different bullets, worked OK, but had 5 different nose punches just for 45 auto. Now use the nose first method and retired about 30 different nose punches. Now the Star is outfitted with a heated base, bullet feeder, and a pneumatic lube actuator. What a deam to use. Still have a Star loading press with, 45 auto, 9mm, 38/357, 32 S&W long, 44 mag and 30 carbine heads. Both the lubricator and press are lifetime machines with minumum maintance.

  20. #20
    Boolit Buddy rbwillnj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Northwest NJ
    Posts
    164
    brshooter, we are of the same mind. Have you ever seen a post where someone said they had a Star, but got rid of it and went back the their Lyman or RCBS....I don't think so. Not that they won't do a great job of sizing bullets, but once you have used a Star, your hooked. ....and Star Reloaders are pretty good too. My collection of Star Reloaders is bigger than my collection of Star Lubsizers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check