Lee PrecisionSnyders JerkyTitan ReloadingLoad Data
WidenersMidSouth Shooters SupplyRotoMetals2Inline Fabrication
Reloading Everything Repackbox
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 44 of 44

Thread: Heavy 45 acp boolit?

  1. #41
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Posts
    8
    I have a few samples of the 300 grain 45ACP bullets.

  2. #42
    Boolit Master



    ddixie884's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Avery, Texas
    Posts
    1,309
    Cool..................
    JMHO-YMMV
    dd884
    gary@2texastrucks.com
    Gary D. Peek

  3. #43
    Boolit Master

    alamogunr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    4,509
    Interesting resurrection of an old discussion. Just to add my 2¢, I have an Arsenal 45-230 WFN mold. I've not loaded any yet because I wanted to try powder coat on them but may not wait for that. The lube groove looks sort of shallow but is probably enough to handle regular loaded 45 ACP velocities.
    John
    W.TN

  4. #44
    Boolit Grand Master Char-Gar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    12,820
    IMHO, the shooting of ultra-heavy bullets in a 1911 is not a very good idea. I do understand that attractiveness of the notion as those heavies do hit with a noticeable thump. The heaviest bullet I have used weights 242 grains (452423) and there is a noticeable difference in recoil, slide speed and impact on target vis-a-vi a 230 grain bullet. Any good 1911 with a properly throated barrel will feed these 100%.

    The problem is the battering the very heavies do to the pistol. This can be compensated for, to a degree, with recoil buffers and heavy springs, but those present their own problems.

    There really is no reason to do this anyway. Today, Accurate and other mold makers cut molds for a 230 grain with rounded sides and a meplat as big as the 452423. It is the meplat that does the work and these new bullets feed without problems, produce higher velocities than the heavies, will put a real hurtin on the target and not produce undue wear and battering on the pistol. The ultra-heavies were a notion in the past and make no sense today, when we have much better option.
    Disclaimer: The above is not holy writ. It is just my opinion based on my experience and knowledge. Your mileage may vary.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check