Lee PrecisionLoad DataMidSouth Shooters SupplyTitan Reloading
Reloading EverythingRotoMetals2Snyders JerkyInline Fabrication
Wideners Repackbox
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 132

Thread: Isit worth Powder Coating apart from purely cosmetic reasons?

  1. #21
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Wilmington NC
    Posts
    1,456
    Quote Originally Posted by jdgabbard View Post
    ... I'm seriously starting to wonder if gaschecks are even needed anymore for rounds under 2000fps....
    I use mostly plain base and have no application where I am even trying to go faster than just a little over 2000 fps.

    Some boolits intended for use with gas checks shoot fine without. Some on the other hand seem to be more accurate with the check. My 7 TCU is definitely more accurate with the check installed on my Lee 128, but I think this may be more of the bullet staying better aligned in the case neck at my desired COAL.

    The one application where I see a gas check as strongly recommended is for gas guns like the AR-15. In 300 BO guns and in a 357 Max AR, I had lead deposits in the bolt area when shooting without gas checks. This tells me that the base of the bullet was being gas cut as the base travels over the port. These applications also seem to have more than typical flyers. Again I attribute this to the same bullet base damage described above.

  2. #22
    Boolit Master
    jdgabbard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Tulsa, Oklahoma
    Posts
    2,535
    Quote Originally Posted by P Flados View Post
    I use mostly plain base and have no application where I am even trying to go faster than just a little over 2000 fps.

    Some boolits intended for use with gas checks shoot fine without. Some on the other hand seem to be more accurate with the check. My 7 TCU is definitely more accurate with the check installed on my Lee 128, but I think this may be more of the bullet staying better aligned in the case neck at my desired COAL.

    The one application where I see a gas check as strongly recommended is for gas guns like the AR-15. In 300 BO guns and in a 357 Max AR, I had lead deposits in the bolt area when shooting without gas checks. This tells me that the base of the bullet was being gas cut as the base travels over the port. These applications also seem to have more than typical flyers. Again I attribute this to the same bullet base damage described above.
    I was referring to the general use of powdercoated bullets. I haven't found an application where I need a GC due to speed issues when PCing. Sure, AR type rifles can also benefit from this. But I'm not normally shooting cast out of my AR type rifles. If I had a 300blk maybe....
    Currently looking for a Lyman/Ideal 311419 Mold - PM if you have one you'd like to get rid of!

    JDGabbard's Feedback Thread

    "A hand on a gun is better than a cop on the phone," Jerry Ellis, Oklahoma State House of Representatives.

    The neighbors refer to me affectionately as, "The nut up on the ridge with the cannon." - MaxHeadSpace.

    Jdgabbard's very own boolit boxes pattern!

  3. #23
    Boolit Master
    Hick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Winnemucca, NV
    Posts
    1,609
    You asked for one good example, and I have several: I have a plain based spire point 175 grain mold that I use with my Enfield (303 British). Lubed it is OK, but powder coated I can drive it to a faster velocity than with lube and it is very, very accurate-- the rifle loves it. 30-30 Lyman 311410 (another plain based mold) with PC it runs much, much better than lubed. With an extra cost of PC to bump up the size to 0.311 the same bullet is great in my CZ-527 in 7.62 x 39 (it has a 0.311 barrel). I had an old Ideal 321-427 single cavity that shot so-so in my 32 WS. Its a gas check mold. Drilled out the mold to make it plain based and it shoots so much better with PC. Add to that, I don't have to keep spending money on Gas checks to get to higher velocities (checks are more expensive per bullet than PC).
    Hick: Iron sights!

  4. #24
    Boolit Grand Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Michigan
    Posts
    9,023
    You should try both methods and see what works best for you.

    I will never PC but that is what works for me. I may be “wrong”, but I can live with it.

    Too much to discuss to get into it here. In the end, no one really cares. Do what is best for your needs.
    Don Verna


  5. #25
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    599
    The fact that you don't get any smoke with PC is enough to make me steer clear of it. I love the smoke especially from my single action revolvers. But then I only shoot outdoors on my farm.

  6. #26
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Jul 2023
    Posts
    126
    I powder coat just because I can...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails IMG_20240322_205635272_HDR~3.jpg  

  7. #27
    Boolit Buddy atfsux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    180
    For me, the biggest gain is in keeping my health. Because the lead is completely encapsulated, there is no longer (or at least very little) atomized airborne micro lead particles created and dispersed in the air with the muzzleblast. At an indoor range is where this is most greatly realized as a benefit to preventing accidentally inhaling and ingesting lead. But even on an outdoor range, when the wind is blowing back in your face.
    When democracy becomes tyranny, those of us with rifles still get to vote.

  8. #28
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    231
    I have not started PC’ing boolits yet. That said, I do intend to get to it eventually. My reason for wanting to go that route is that I have always thought that you could get higher speeds with softer alloys without leading. I am down to a fair amount of pure lead…and not much else. Am I wrong that powder coating allows you to push a soft boolit a little faster, all else equal?

    8mmFan

  9. #29
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Jul 2023
    Posts
    126
    I stopped caring about bullet hardness once I started powder coating. I only had roofing lead at the time when I started casting and was scared into believing I was going to foul up my barrel and worse..."KENTUCKY BALLISTIC" myself. I obtained materials to harden my bullets, but have not seen much of a performance difference between my pure pc lead and the hard pc lead but I only shoot 1100-1800 fps. Expansion is not real important to me anymore either as anything that is hit with my .44, ..454, .460, 45-70/90, or 500 is going to feel it regardless. Depending on what I am shooting at seems to determine my bullet expansion for the most part. I would have to catch a few bullets in mid air to see what/if any differences there would be prior to hitting the target. So, I now just shoot soft lead with a good coating of powder coat. If I was to go back to hard bullets...babbitt would be my choice again.

  10. #30
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    4,394
    Quote Originally Posted by atfsux View Post
    For me, the biggest gain is in keeping my health. Because the lead is completely encapsulated, there is no longer (or at least very little) atomized airborne micro lead particles created and dispersed in the air with the muzzleblast. At an indoor range is where this is most greatly realized as a benefit to preventing accidentally inhaling and ingesting lead. But even on an outdoor range, when the wind is blowing back in your face.
    What about the lead from the priming compound? You didn't mention it.

  11. #31
    Boolit Master Oldfeller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    818
    Here is my figuring on the choice of PC or greased lead.

    If I were starting over, I'd be PC all the way. There are advantages to PC apart from just cleanliness, but that single point is an important item to many of us who are now "more afraid of lead poisoning" as we are older and "more frail" health-wise.

    My main point between the methods is equipment cost. A push through LEE sizer for each caliber plus a beat up toaster oven and some dime store pans and parchment paper is a lot cheaper than lubriciser dies and a lubriciser, lube sticks and a heater rig. Cost of store bought stick lube vs cheap easy to use powder coating is about a wash, but the main costs that creep into either system is buying the upper level "neat stuff" that is available for both systems.

    Flexibility to bulk up a bullet's size (and multi-coating undersized bullets) is worth mentioning. Using much softer lead is another.

    Plus, shooting greased lead requires a learning and experience curve that powder coating from the get go simply does not make you scrabble to climb up that learning curve when you are just starting casting.


    ====================================


    < What about the lead from the priming compound? You didn't mention it. >

    Hey, unless you shoot a lot in un-ventilated indoor ranges the vaporous lead from primers going off should be very much diluted by the powder blast itself putting a little bit of lead out inside a massive discharge of powder gases that get intermixed with a matching HUGE volume of plain clean air such that if you are outside it simply isn't much of a concern.

    If you can't smell it anything, you are "thin enough" to not have much danger of lead poisoning.

    Anyone that shoots is going to be exposed to this potential source of lead so if you see a cloud of gunsmoke, don't breathe it in. Duh.
    Last edited by Oldfeller; 04-16-2024 at 07:07 AM.
    All retired now, just growing tomatoes and building and shooting my guns.

  12. #32
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Las Cruces, NM
    Posts
    4,562
    And if you buy the NOE bushing sizer system then it is a real bargain since you can easily pick the exact size you want for each gun.

  13. #33
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Middle of the Mitten
    Posts
    1,463
    I personally do Not PC.. I like my (old lubri-sizer) Method. My fresh sized and Lubed Boolits, get very lightly dusted with Motor Mica, which I learned Years ago... No Sticky!
    But, I have a couple arms which require over sized projectiles...so, I do Plan to try PC just to result in a Slightly Larger Projectile. If it ends up simpler than "other" methods.. so be it

  14. #34
    Boolit Master


    Finster101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SW Fla
    Posts
    2,663
    Quote Originally Posted by charlie b View Post
    And if you buy the NOE bushing sizer system then it is a real bargain since you can easily pick the exact size you want for each gun.

    Yes sir. I had a couple of Lee push throughs but when I needed a couple of new sizes I went with the NOE setup. While initial kit is a bit more adding size bushings is dirt cheap and I believe more true to the claimed size.

  15. #35
    Boolit Master
    jdgabbard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Tulsa, Oklahoma
    Posts
    2,535
    Quote Originally Posted by Finster101 View Post
    Yes sir. I had a couple of Lee push throughs but when I needed a couple of new sizes I went with the NOE setup. While initial kit is a bit more adding size bushings is dirt cheap and I believe more true to the claimed size.
    Lee's new bushing system for the APP press can also be used with any of the breech-lock presses. I use their adapter for the APP mounted in an older Challenger press. Works great, and their bushing are only about $11/piece over at Titan. Sometimes they're even less... MUCH more economical than buying $30-40 sizer dies from Lyman or RCBS....
    Currently looking for a Lyman/Ideal 311419 Mold - PM if you have one you'd like to get rid of!

    JDGabbard's Feedback Thread

    "A hand on a gun is better than a cop on the phone," Jerry Ellis, Oklahoma State House of Representatives.

    The neighbors refer to me affectionately as, "The nut up on the ridge with the cannon." - MaxHeadSpace.

    Jdgabbard's very own boolit boxes pattern!

  16. #36
    Boolit Buddy

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    west Tn
    Posts
    463
    Long term storage, pc boolits do not oxide, can be stored with out worrying about becoming a toxic lead hazard. Have found lead balls and unlubed boolits that were stored long term in the leather ball pouch that were covered with the white oxidation. Before casting my own, bought boolits from Missouri Bullet company, the blue lube used on their boolits would harden and come out of the lube grooves over a long period of time. Pc stays on if applied correctly.

  17. #37
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brushy Mountains of NC
    Posts
    1,361
    I can use PC to increase the diameter of a bullet. When I have to leave ammo in a car, mostly handgun ammo, there is no chance of lube melting and running into the powder. I have two molds that look the same loaded, one is heavier, use color coding. Powder coating doesn't stick to a seating die stem like TL. It doesn't collect grit and is cleaner and is easier to clean a bore. Probably a couple other things.

    I don't use it for everything but it is another valuable tool in my box and I like options.

  18. #38
    Boolit Master Handloader109's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    NW Arkansas
    Posts
    2,533
    Quote Originally Posted by jdgabbard View Post
    Lee's new bushing system for the APP press can also be used with any of the breech-lock presses. I use their adapter for the APP mounted in an older Challenger press. Works great, and their bushing are only about $11/piece over at Titan. Sometimes they're even less... MUCH more economical than buying $30-40 sizer dies from Lyman or RCBS....
    This is surely the way. I sold off all my std Lee sizers and bought same number of new APP bushings and paid for the press with the profits. I PC all my handgun ammo and I can push cast 22tcm ammo to 220fps and zero leading with only PC

    Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk

  19. #39
    Boolit Master Oldfeller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    818
    Guys, got a direct link to this stuff?

    Finding sub components for LEE presses is time consuming and I am never sure I have located the specific bits you are talking about.
    All retired now, just growing tomatoes and building and shooting my guns.

  20. #40
    Boolit Master schutzen-jager's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    peoples republic of new jersey
    Posts
    833
    in my experience powder coating is time consuming + expensive + shows not one single advantage in any way over properly applied liquid alox + most conventual lubes -
    never pick a fight with an old man - if he is too old to fight he will just kill you -
    in this current crisis our government is not the solution , it is the problem ! -

    ILLEGITIMI NON CARBORUNDUM

    as they say in latin

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check