Snyders JerkyLoad DataLee PrecisionRepackbox
Reloading EverythingMidSouth Shooters SupplyWidenersTitan Reloading
RotoMetals2 Inline Fabrication
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: 16-1

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    130

    16-1

    When using wheel weights or linotype made from real type, it's fairly understandable that you will get crud floating to the top once fluxed. And it keeps coming up during a casting session. There isn't anything particularly "pure" about them.

    I bought some 16-1 from a well known supplier, and you can get a certification of it if you pay for it. My question is, I still get the grey crud floating up from what I assumed was controlled components. And I started this in a new-to-casting pot which I scrubbed completely clean.

    I also thought the grey stuff was antimony, but there isn't supposed to be any in there.

  2. #2
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    NE Kansas
    Posts
    2,433
    You have fluxed (not sure what you used), but what did you use to reduce the oxide back into metal?

  3. #3
    Boolit Master gc45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    wash
    Posts
    544
    15-1 16-1 or more correctly #2 Lyman. - In my shop are several pallets of the stuff, bought years back from local non-ferrous company who, in my opinion makes very good quality melts for any and all customers from marine to shooting sports. When I flux, there is minimal junk floating about and oce spooned off I get great bullets. I also mix it 50-50 with pure as possible lead and for a softer bullet in my handguns of 1000fps or less.

  4. #4
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    130
    I used beeswax to flux.

  5. #5
    Boolit Master gc45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    wash
    Posts
    544
    i too use Beeswax for fluxing.

  6. #6
    Boolit Master huntinlever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    S. Central Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,196
    I don't think that's impurity, I'd say it's tin oxide - which needs to be reduced and incorporated back.

    Edit: Missed a couple posts above. Yes, I'd say that's tin oxidation and not likely from impure alloy.
    -Paul

  7. #7
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Oct 2021
    Posts
    130
    Having never heard of doing anything other than "normal" fluxing, what and how is used to correct this?

  8. #8
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,324
    That "crud" on top of each alloy is simply oxidized alloy. When you flux it will mix right back into the alloy.

    The crud is the same alloy as still molten. It is not tin separating from the alloy.

    As mentioned, what is happening is what will happen. Just learn to flux as we all have.
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  9. #9
    Boolit Master huntinlever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    S. Central Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,196
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gibson View Post
    That "crud" on top of each alloy is simply oxidized alloy. When you flux it will mix right back into the alloy.

    The crud is the same alloy as still molten. It is not tin separating from the alloy.

    As mentioned, what is happening is what will happen. Just learn to flux as we all have.
    Oh, I didn't know that. I'd thought somehow the tin was preferentially oxidized, and so losing it would mean losing a percentage of tin in the alloy as cast. So, it's just pure loss, then - no changes in terms of content to poured alloy?
    -Paul

  10. #10
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,324
    Quote Originally Posted by huntinlever View Post
    Oh, I didn't know that. I'd thought somehow the tin was preferentially oxidized, and so losing it would mean losing a percentage of tin in the alloy as cast. So, it's just pure loss, then - no changes in terms of content to poured alloy?
    None at all. Once the tin is mixed into solution with the lead it will not be separating from the lead during any kind of normal casting operation. As mentioned the "scum" that forms on top is the same alloy that is just oxidized.
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  11. #11
    Boolit Master huntinlever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    S. Central Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,196
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gibson View Post
    None at all. Once the tin is mixed into solution with the lead it will not be separating from the lead during any kind of normal casting operation.
    Great to know. Thanks Larry.
    -Paul

  12. #12
    Boolit Master


    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Franklin, TN
    Posts
    1,657
    You have to reduce the scum back into the mix, not just flux. It is a chemical reaction, not physical. There is a difference in reducing and fluxing.
    Good Luck,
    Rick

  13. #13
    Boolit Master huntinlever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    S. Central Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,196
    Quote Originally Posted by RickinTN View Post
    You have to reduce the scum back into the mix, not just flux. It is a chemical reaction, not physical. There is a difference in reducing and fluxing.
    Good Luck,
    Rick
    This is my confusion, I guess. If we are reducing oxidized material back into the mix, but the oxidized material is the same content, though oxidized, as the molten content - there's no real issue in terms of cast alloy, right? I.e., to make it obvious, say the only "crud" is 100% oxidized tin. That would mean the molten mass is now significantly lower in tin and you will be casting a much softer alloy than 16:1, so it's critical to reduce the tin back into the molten mass.

    But if the crud is nothing more than oxidized 16:1, the only benefit of reduction would be to limit yield losses in total, right?
    -Paul

  14. #14
    Boolit Grand Master
    white eagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    718 miles E. of Wall Drug
    Posts
    6,173
    I just skim it off and discard it
    Hit em'hard
    hit em'often

  15. #15
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,324
    The use of some "fluxes" are also excellent "reductants" to remix the oxidized alloy back into the mix. Beeswax and paraffin are two. They work quite well with alloy that is already smelted. While they will flux the oxidized alloy back into the mix and bring debris to the surface, they won't separate many impurities from the mix as will a true reductant. Something as simple as sawdust is an excellent reductant and flux and is best used outdoors when smelting material initially such as COWWs.

    When fluxing the alloy in the Mag20 I drop a piece of beeswax (about marble size) onto the alloy and then 2 or three wooden matches. The matches ignite and reduce the smoke/smell of the beeswax 95+%. The alloy fluxes excellently and with the matches I like to think I'm get a good redux also. Maybe not but it's worked for me for many years.
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  16. #16
    Boolit Grand Master


    missionary5155's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Temporarily near Orlando FL
    Posts
    7,133
    We also use beeswax and once it smokes light it afire. We also stir with a dry wood stick.
    "Come unto Me, all you who labor and are heavy burdened, and I will give you rest." Matthew 11:28
    Male Guanaco out in dry lakebed at 10,800 feet south of Arequipa.

  17. #17
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    New Market, Iowa
    Posts
    1,471
    Quote Originally Posted by PopcornSutton View Post
    When using wheel weights or linotype made from real type, it's fairly understandable that you will get crud floating to the top once fluxed. And it keeps coming up during a casting session. There isn't anything particularly "pure" about them.

    I bought some 16-1 from a well known supplier, and you can get a certification of it if you pay for it. My question is, I still get the grey crud floating up from what I assumed was controlled components. And I started this in a new-to-casting pot which I scrubbed completely clean.

    I also thought the grey stuff was antimony, but there isn't supposed to be any in there.
    I have the same problem with 1-20 lead, also from a well known supplier. I just skim it off and discard it, otherwise the crud accumulates around the pour spout and then drip, drip, drip.

  18. #18
    Boolit Grand Master

    gwpercle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana
    Posts
    9,298
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gibson View Post
    That "crud" on top of each alloy is simply oxidized alloy. When you flux it will mix right back into the alloy.

    The crud is the same alloy as still molten. It is not tin separating from the alloy.

    As mentioned, what is happening is what will happen. Just learn to flux as we all have.

    And as long as you keep the metal molten ... the heat will form more oxides and it will float to the surface ... it never stops and it has nothing to do with the lead and tin or where you bought it . When casting from a 20 lb. pot with a Lyman spouted ladel , I will do 3 -4 quick beeswax fluxes and skim the top during the course of a casting run .
    And the higher the heat ... the more oxides will form .
    Gary
    Certified Cajun
    Proud Member of The Basket of Deplorables
    " Let's Go Brandon !"

  19. #19
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,536
    It also happens to me when I have my pot temperature turned way up. The hotter it gets the quicker I get crud. Just oxidization is everybody else has said. I just keep scraping it off every so often.

  20. #20
    Boolit Grand Master popper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    10,581
    I just scrape it off and save it for the next melt. Beeswax flux used here.
    Whatever!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check