Reloading EverythingLee PrecisionMidSouth Shooters SupplyLoad Data
Titan ReloadingRotoMetals2Inline FabricationWideners
Repackbox Snyders Jerky
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 128

Thread: .360 Buckhammer

  1. #41
    Boolit Master


    cwlongshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Central Connecticut
    Posts
    3,735
    Quote Originally Posted by shaman View Post
    I just had a bum realization: a 30-30 can't be rebored to 360 BuckHammer. Drat.
    I have read this twice now. I havent seen an official drawing if the 360. Where lies the issue cause it sure looks as it would..

    CW
    NRA Life member • REMEMBER, FREEDOM IS NOT FREE its being paid for in BLOOD.
    Come visit my RUMBLE & uTube page's !!

    https://www.RUMBLE.com/user/Cwlongshot
    https://youtube.com/channel/UCBOIIvlk30qD5a7xVLfmyfw

  2. #42

  3. #43
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SRC Northwest FL
    Posts
    673
    Will the older 336 actions withstand the pressure of the new 360 buckhammer?

  4. #44
    Boolit Buddy shaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Neave, KY
    Posts
    136
    Quote Originally Posted by barnetmill View Post
    Will the older 336 actions withstand the pressure of the new 360 buckhammer?
    Good question. I'd say yes. The 336 will take a 307 WIN and a 356 WIN. This is considerably less, but I'm no expert. I'll wait six months and see if JES has the ways and means for doing it. By then the hoopla will have died down and we'll have a better idea.

  5. #45
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SRC Northwest FL
    Posts
    673
    Quote Originally Posted by shaman View Post
    Good question. I'd say yes. The 336 will take a 307 WIN and a 356 WIN. This is considerably less, but I'm no expert. I'll wait six months and see if JES has the ways and means for doing it. By then the hoopla will have died down and we'll have a better idea.
    I was wondering the heaviest published loads for my marlin 35 with 200 jacketed bullet is about 2200 fps. This is with a bottle neck case and yet this 360 with a mostly straight case goes 2400 fps. I wonder why I can not find published loads at a higher velocity for the .35 remington. I have some pointed flex tip bullets for it.

  6. #46
    Boolit Master GrizzLeeBear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    881
    Quote Originally Posted by barnetmill View Post
    I was wondering the heaviest published loads for my marlin 35 with 200 jacketed bullet is about 2200 fps. This is with a bottle neck case and yet this 360 with a mostly straight case goes 2400 fps. I wonder why I can not find published loads at a higher velocity for the .35 remington. I have some pointed flex tip bullets for it.
    The 35 Remington max. pressure is 33,500 psi due to the autoloading rifles it was introduced in. It looks like they are running the 360 at around 50,000 psi.

    Also, it looks like velocity of 2,400 fps is with the 180 gr bullet. 200 gr. bullet it 2,200 fps. which duplicates 35 Rem. load.

  7. #47
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SRC Northwest FL
    Posts
    673
    Quote Originally Posted by GrizzLeeBear View Post
    The 35 Remington max. pressure is 33,500 psi due to the autoloading rifles it was introduced in. It looks like they are running the 360 at around 50,000 psi.

    Also, it looks like velocity of 2,400 fps is with the 180 gr bullet. 200 gr. bullet it 2,200 fps. which duplicates 35 Rem. load.
    Still I wonder what pressure the JM marlin 336 rifles from the 60's will take? I assume that they were stronger than the remington rifles of the pre-WWII era. There was an autoloading model remington and there was spiral tubular magazine pump rifle 14/141 I think.

  8. #48
    Boolit Grand Master Nobade's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    SE WV
    Posts
    6,267
    After looking at the cartridge drawing I think the engineers made a mistake. They have it as a straight taper from the base to the mouth with no parallel section to hold the bullet. That is going to allow the bullet to be seated crooked with no way to maintain consistency which will allow it to go down the bore slightly tipped and ruin any fine accuracy, especially when combined with a steep 12 degree/side throat with no parallel section and a 1:12 twist rate. This cartridge could have been a top choice for cast bullet shooters but I suspect it is going to be one of those "finicky" rounds once people start working with it.

  9. #49
    Boolit Master


    cwlongshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Central Connecticut
    Posts
    3,735
    A 360 BH talk with Remington with Target Suite.

    https://youtu.be/3sA5htOvczs
    NRA Life member • REMEMBER, FREEDOM IS NOT FREE its being paid for in BLOOD.
    Come visit my RUMBLE & uTube page's !!

    https://www.RUMBLE.com/user/Cwlongshot
    https://youtube.com/channel/UCBOIIvlk30qD5a7xVLfmyfw

  10. #50
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    2,506
    Quote Originally Posted by cwlongshot View Post
    A 360 BH talk with Remington with Target Suite.

    https://youtu.be/3sA5htOvczs
    Brought to you by the same company that introduced the 5mm rimfire round. I know several people who own Rem rifles and only rarely find some Mexican made ammo for those guns. If you buy one, learn to reload if you don’t reload now.

  11. #51
    Boolit Master


    cwlongshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Central Connecticut
    Posts
    3,735
    NRA Life member • REMEMBER, FREEDOM IS NOT FREE its being paid for in BLOOD.
    Come visit my RUMBLE & uTube page's !!

    https://www.RUMBLE.com/user/Cwlongshot
    https://youtube.com/channel/UCBOIIvlk30qD5a7xVLfmyfw

  12. #52
    Boolit Master


    cwlongshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Central Connecticut
    Posts
    3,735
    Quote Originally Posted by NSB View Post
    Brought to you by the same company that introduced the 5mm rimfire round. I know several people who own Rem rifles and only rarely find some Mexican made ammo for those guns. If you buy one, learn to reload if you don’t reload now.
    Well, they also brought out seven Mile Remington magnum, a 35 Remington, and countless others that have stood the test of time. Everybody has stinkers everybody has lemons. Everybody has bad days.
    NRA Life member • REMEMBER, FREEDOM IS NOT FREE its being paid for in BLOOD.
    Come visit my RUMBLE & uTube page's !!

    https://www.RUMBLE.com/user/Cwlongshot
    https://youtube.com/channel/UCBOIIvlk30qD5a7xVLfmyfw

  13. #53
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    2,506
    Quote Originally Posted by cwlongshot View Post
    Well, they also brought out seven Mile Remington magnum, a 35 Remington, and countless others that have stood the test of time. Everybody has stinkers everybody has lemons. Everybody has bad days.
    Sorry, I didn’t mean to call your baby ugly. I was just sharing my opinion….this is going to be one of those “johnny come lately” cartridges lagging behind the 350 Legend, and getting ammo is going to be hit or miss. I can’t help but think what Remington did with the 5mm rimfire. There’s a reason why it failed…along with Remington itself not doing very well at this time.

  14. #54
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    1,828
    Quote Originally Posted by Nobade View Post
    After looking at the cartridge drawing I think the engineers made a mistake. They have it as a straight taper from the base to the mouth with no parallel section to hold the bullet. That is going to allow the bullet to be seated crooked with no way to maintain consistency which will allow it to go down the bore slightly tipped and ruin any fine accuracy, especially when combined with a steep 12 degree/side throat with no parallel section and a 1:12 twist rate. This cartridge could have been a top choice for cast bullet shooters but I suspect it is going to be one of those "finicky" rounds once people start working with it.
    you noticed that too.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	360Buckhammer.jpg 
Views:	63 
Size:	22.7 KB 
ID:	309655

    ..

  15. #55
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    458
    50,000 psi….. will a 336 action handle that pressure ???

  16. #56
    Boolit Master


    cwlongshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Central Connecticut
    Posts
    3,735
    Quote Originally Posted by NSB View Post
    Sorry, I didn’t mean to call your baby ugly. I was just sharing my opinion….this is going to be one of those “johnny come lately” cartridges lagging behind the 350 Legend, and getting ammo is going to be hit or miss. I can’t help but think what Remington did with the 5mm rimfire. There’s a reason why it failed…along with Remington itself not doing very well at this time.
    I like it, its not my baby, but I like all 35's.

    You aint wrong, The previous "Remington" did have a crappy reputation supporting new offerings. I remember NOTHING about the 260 and just a flash about the 7/08!! But remember this is not "that" Remington. Time will tell if they follow the same Path. That page has not been written yet.

    CW
    NRA Life member • REMEMBER, FREEDOM IS NOT FREE its being paid for in BLOOD.
    Come visit my RUMBLE & uTube page's !!

    https://www.RUMBLE.com/user/Cwlongshot
    https://youtube.com/channel/UCBOIIvlk30qD5a7xVLfmyfw

  17. #57
    Boolit Master


    cwlongshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Central Connecticut
    Posts
    3,735
    Quote Originally Posted by Beerd View Post
    you noticed that too.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	360Buckhammer.jpg 
Views:	63 
Size:	22.7 KB 
ID:	309655

    ..
    Good catch, its a real concern.
    NRA Life member • REMEMBER, FREEDOM IS NOT FREE its being paid for in BLOOD.
    Come visit my RUMBLE & uTube page's !!

    https://www.RUMBLE.com/user/Cwlongshot
    https://youtube.com/channel/UCBOIIvlk30qD5a7xVLfmyfw

  18. #58
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Wilmington NC
    Posts
    1,452
    Quote Originally Posted by Nobade View Post
    After looking at the cartridge drawing I think the engineers made a mistake. They have it as a straight taper from the base to the mouth with no parallel section to hold the bullet. That is going to allow the bullet to be seated crooked with no way to maintain consistency which will allow it to go down the bore slightly tipped and ruin any fine accuracy, especially when combined with a steep 12 degree/side throat with no parallel section and a 1:12 twist rate. This cartridge could have been a top choice for cast bullet shooters but I suspect it is going to be one of those "finicky" rounds once people start working with it.
    I doubt that this is really a problem. The round has a very slight taper. As long as the brass is first sized small enough, and then expanded using a plug (~0.356"), the ID of the brass at the front of the round will be adequately consistent to hold a bullet straight.

    Also note that the wall thickness of most cases is thinnest at the mouth and thicker as you get farther back. They may have "engineered" this taper in wall thickness to get a more consistent ID than you would expect at first glance.

    When I look at photos of loaded ammo, many seem to have that slight bulge at the base of the bullet. This indicates the bullet is being gripped by the brass along the full length that is inside the case.
    Last edited by P Flados; 01-23-2023 at 09:08 PM.

  19. #59
    Boolit Master GrizzLeeBear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    881
    Also, keep in mind that does not appear to be the SAAMI drawing (which would also include a chamber drawing). It may be an early "concept" drawing and just shows the taper continuing to the case mouth.

    I looked at the SAMMI site and there doesn't appear to be a drawing for the 360 yet.

  20. #60
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Dec 2021
    Posts
    364
    Quote Originally Posted by Nobade View Post
    After looking at the cartridge drawing I think the engineers made a mistake. They have it as a straight taper from the base to the mouth with no parallel section to hold the bullet. That is going to allow the bullet to be seated crooked with no way to maintain consistency which will allow it to go down the bore slightly tipped and ruin any fine accuracy, especially when combined with a steep 12 degree/side throat with no parallel section and a 1:12 twist rate. This cartridge could have been a top choice for cast bullet shooters but I suspect it is going to be one of those "finicky" rounds once people start working with it.
    The interior of the case is tapered. This is not an issue.

    45_Colt

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check