MidSouth Shooters SupplyRotoMetals2Snyders JerkyReloading Everything
Lee PrecisionTitan ReloadingWidenersRepackbox
Load Data Inline Fabrication
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 41

Thread: 1:16, a few questions

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    452

    1:16, a few questions

    I have always worked with coww or a mixture of coww/pure. I am getting into muzzleloaders, and was encouraged to use a 1:16 alloy. 2 questions, any real problem using pewter instead of tin at the same 1:16 ratio? 2nd question, at what velocity does the alloy stop reliably expanding? I am getting 1600 fps muzzle velocity (lee 452-300 with a sabot) and trying to figure out my max range. Thanks!

  2. #2
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    May 2022
    Location
    MPLS
    Posts
    1,486
    I use only pure lead at about 1200FPS or a tad less. Does not really not expand. Best mix for big slow flat nose bullets.

  3. #3
    Moderator Emeritus


    JonB_in_Glencoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    15,873
    Pewter is a poor choice, you'll end up with a alloy that's harder the 16:1
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun.”
    ― The Dalai Lama, Seattle Times, May 2001

  4. #4
    Boolit Buddy Sam Sackett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Shippensburg, PA
    Posts
    376
    Pewter is usually 96 - 99% tin. Use it just as you would use tin when alloying lead.

    Sam Sackett

  5. #5
    Moderator Emeritus


    JonB_in_Glencoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    15,873
    Were you told "why" to use 16:1 ?
    FYI, I've learned if you ask a question to a bunch of people who shoot front stuffers, you'll likely get a bunch of different answers.
    Here's my answer, I use 200:1
    That is 0.5% tin, it's just enough Tin to not change the hardness any measurable amount, but is enough Tin to inhibit corrosion/oxidation.
    That's my 2˘
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun.”
    ― The Dalai Lama, Seattle Times, May 2001

  6. #6
    Boolit Master
    triggerhappy243's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Albuquerque N.M.
    Posts
    2,158
    Quote Originally Posted by jonb_in_glencoe View Post
    were you told "why" to use 16:1 ?
    Fyi, i've learned if you ask a question to a bunch of people who shoot front stuffers, you'll likely get a bunch of different answers.
    Here's my answer, i use 200:1
    that is 0.5% tin, it's just enough tin to not change the hardness any measurable amount, but is enough tin to inhibit corrosion/oxidation.
    That's my 2˘
    tin also aides in mold fillout.

  7. #7
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Communist New Jersey
    Posts
    905
    16-1 is 11bhn which is a bit high for muzzle loading isn't it?

    And using a 16 pure to 1 pewter will give you 15.6 bhn. Way to high for black powder and muzzleloading! That is regular rifle territory.

  8. #8
    Boolit Master hc18flyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    NE Nebraska
    Posts
    1,187
    I have not had trouble with pure lead 'fillout' in muzzle loading conical. Save your tin and pewter. hc18flyer

  9. #9
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Central Texas
    Posts
    1,951
    He mentioned using a sabot - that adds a wrinkle where an alloy could work.

    To answer the OP question, expansion is dependent on many variables, one of which is the intended game. If you have been successfully using 1:16, then feel free to continue. With regard to using pewter vs tin, just base the decision on the final Brinell hardness, rather than an exact ratio. In other words, 1:18 in pewter might be equivalent to 1:16 tin for your application.

  10. #10
    Boolit Master

    Land Owner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Mims, FL
    Posts
    1,864
    Investigate the ratio (1 part in X parts):
    1:10 = 10% Tin
    1:16 = 6.25%
    1:20 = 5%
    1:40 = 2.5%
    1:50 = 2%
    1:100 = 1%
    1:200 = 0.5%

    Consider the cost of alloy @ $10.00 per pound of Tin and @ $1.00 per pound of Lead
    1:10 = (1# x $10.00) + (9# x $1.00) = $19.00 for 10 pounds of alloy = $1.90 per pound
    1:16 = (1# x $10.00) + (15# x $1.00) = $25.00 for 16 pounds = $1.56 per pound
    1:20 = $29.00 for 20#'s = $1.45 per pound
    1:30 = $1.30 per pound
    1:40 = $1.23 per pound
    1:50 = $1.18 per pound
    1:100 = $1.09 per pound
    1:200 = $1.05 per pound


    Now consider how many times you will pull the trigger?

    Let us help you understand how to save money...and keep shooting.
    If it was easy, anybody could do it.

  11. #11
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    England,Ar
    Posts
    7,693
    I see no problem using Pewter in place of tin as it contains 90+ percent tin. But I use pure lead, or as pure as I can find, in my muzzle loader.

  12. #12
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    452
    So you all would use pure, even at 1600-1800 fps? Wouldn't that flatten too much?

  13. #13
    Moderator Emeritus


    JonB_in_Glencoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    15,873
    I've never noticed any "over" expansion with 200-1, but my charge of 75 gr of BP doesn't get anywhere near 1600fps.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun.”
    ― The Dalai Lama, Seattle Times, May 2001

  14. #14
    Boolit Buddy
    Dinny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    189
    Pure lead bullets were used effectively for a long, long time before any of us walked this planet. Let the weight and length of the bullet do their job and kill with authority - period, plain, and simple.
    I prefer peace. But if trouble must come, let it come in my time, so that my children can live in peace.

    Thomas Paine

  15. #15
    Boolit Master
    triggerhappy243's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Albuquerque N.M.
    Posts
    2,158
    What rifle are you working with?

  16. #16
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    452
    I am working with a CVA Wolf muzzleloader, 1:28 twist, 50 Caliber. Planning on using the Lee 452-300 in sabots, in the 1600-1800 fps range

  17. #17
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Communist New Jersey
    Posts
    905
    To me that is not true muzzle loading so figuring out hardness for it is out the window. You are using a 45 cal. bullet inside of a sabot, which I assume is plastic. So this is not really true muzzle loading with bullet and lubed patch. Does a saboted bullet depend in obturation for barrel sealing?

    You will have to excuse my ignorance here since I shoot soft round balls out of a caplock.

  18. #18
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,324
    I use 16-1 alloy cast Maxi Bals in my TC Blk Mtn Magnum 50 cal. I push them at 1570 fps with excellent accuracy. The 16-1 alloy gave the best accuracy when the non-saboted bullet is pushed that hard. I also use the 16-1 alloy in GC'd bullets pushed to 1400 - 1600 fps. With saboted cast bullets in that rifle pushed up to 2000 fps I've found 20-1 alloy to work just fine.
    Expansion with either alloy will be quite sufficient given that muzzle velocity to any reasonable range. Your max range will depend on how reliably (meaning 1st shot every time) you could hit the kill zone (say a 6" bulls eye).
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  19. #19
    Boolit Grand Master Tripplebeards's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,536
    I crossed that bridge 5 years ago and finally figured out how to mix it properly a few months back LOL. I first realized I had to melt a bunch of pewter and get the hardness to figure out the ratio. My current batch to 16 to 1 I started with 21 or 22 Burnell hardness...don't remember between the 1 bh difference right now. I mixed 16 to 1 and got about 10 or 10.2 BH. I had to mix it 8/1 to get 11 bh which I what 16/1 should be.

  20. #20
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    452
    Quote Originally Posted by Rickf1985 View Post
    16-1 is 11bhn which is a bit high for muzzle loading isn't it?

    And using a 16 pure to 1 pewter will give you 15.6 bhn. Way to high for black powder and muzzleloading! That is regular rifle territory.
    I ran the numbers on the spreadsheet and according to what I was able to ascertain 16 pure to 1 pewter gave me 10.5 bhn. Not sure the 15.6 is correct!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check