Titan ReloadingWidenersInline FabricationLee Precision
RotoMetals2Reloading EverythingMidSouth Shooters SupplyRepackbox
Load Data
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Old Hercules load data?

  1. #1
    Boolit Master

    SeabeeMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Spooner, WI
    Posts
    693

    Old Hercules load data?

    Long story short, I acquired quite a bit of sealed Hercules powder: a 15lb cardboard keg of Bullseye, 12+ lbs of 2400, and some others. Everything looks great from what I opened, and obviously I'll keep an eye on things as I use them. No smells, funny appearance, etc. I know this stuff isn't necessarily equivalent to the modern Alliant powder, but I'm not sure how to go about finding a starting point to use it.

    My first thought would be to just find an old Hercules load manual from that era (the 2400 is dated on the containers 83 and 88) and do the normal load workup, starting on the low end. I haven't had much luck digging something like that up online. Does anybody know of any sources for a PDF along those lines before I hit up eBay for a "vintage" manual?

  2. #2
    Moderator Emeritus


    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SW Montana
    Posts
    12,452
    BE has not changed in the last 100+ years. It is tested regularly. 2400 changed less than 1% when it changed manufacturers.
    [The Montana Gianni] Front sight and squeeze

  3. #3
    Boolit Grand Master

    imashooter2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    7,899
    Current data is just fine for both powders. Use with confidence.
    ”We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, yet they are still lying.” –Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn

    My Straight Shooters thread:
    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...raight-shooter

    The Pewter Pictures and Hallmarks thread:
    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...-and-hallmarks

  4. #4
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,222
    The "start 10% under max." rule still applies, less because the propellants' formulations have changed and more b/c the conditions under which YOUR particular batch of propellant might have changed the chemistry. I doubt seriously that much would happen if you DID NOT start at 10% under max, but it only takes one adverse occurrence to make you wish that you had.
    For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. Ecclesiastes 1:18
    He that troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind: and the fool become servant to the wise of heart. Proverbs 11:29
    ...Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of my brethren, ye have done it unto me. Matthew 25:40


    Carpe SCOTCH!

  5. #5
    Moderator


    Winger Ed.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Just outside Gun Barrel City, Texas
    Posts
    9,484
    When they make a batch of powder, such as Bullseye- they run lab tests on it.
    It has to come out within (I think) 5% of the 'Bullseye' specifications or they can't/won't call it Bullseye.
    They'll sell it off to some commercial ammo maker to do their own tests and load a big run of factory ammo with it.

    So, if your can says Bullseye, it is within 5% of being exactly the same as a new one, or a can left over from the early 1900s.
    In school: We learn lessons, and are given tests.
    In life: We are given tests, and learn lessons.


    OK People. Enough of this idle chit-chat.
    This ain't your Grandma's sewing circle.
    EVERYONE!
    Back to your oars. The Captain wants to waterski.

  6. #6
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Wilmington NC
    Posts
    1,441
    The 2005 booklet was the last one before they got rid of a bunch of info. I consider this one to be a great resource.

    http://marvinstuart.com/firearm/Manu...20-%202005.pdf


    I also have some of the older booklets that do not have pressure values in psi. I do not trust these at all.

  7. #7
    Boolit Master

    SeabeeMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Spooner, WI
    Posts
    693
    Thank you all! I didn't realize those 2 in particular were so consistent across the years. There are so many threads on this topic that quickly devolve into a debate, it's tough to get solid info from them.

  8. #8
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,305
    "I know this stuff isn't necessarily equivalent to the modern Alliant powder,"

    So how is it you "know" that? I only ask because it is not a correct statemnt or assumption. Alliant did not change the formulas nor the specification of burn rate for either powder. If you read it on a forum or in a magazine it is just someone's conjecture. Alliant says they have not changed. I have compared through actual pressure testing older Hercules Bullseye, 2400 Blue Dot and a couple others with current Alliant powders. They are well within lot-to-lot pressure specifications with identical loads of each.

    If you are basing your "know" on lower "max loads" in manuals today, then that is also an incorrect comparison. Many loads with all powders of all makes are most often lower in today's manuals because of the much better and much easier to use pressure measuring equipment used. Also, because today almost all manual loads adhere to SAAMI pressure standards. Where data is listed for a non SAAMI standardized cartridge the manual loads are usually conservative. Years ago, perhaps 30+ most manuals loaded the cartridges until "pressure signs" developed then they backed off a tudge and called that the "max load". Only a few actually pressure tested the loads and then because CUP testing is very time consuming and expensive. Due to liability and the availability of modern, easy to use pressure testing equipment most manuals, if they have developed their own loads, stick with SAAMI specifications. Alway be suspect of manuals with plagiarized load data as they don't say where it came from or if it was pressure tested.

    As mentioned, the adage to always reduce to a 'start load" and work back up is always excellent advice and it should be followed.

    Excellent find BTW regardless of what it may have cost (hopefully you got it for a good price) given the scarcity and cost of powder these days.
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  9. #9
    Boolit Grand Master Char-Gar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    12,820
    Quote Originally Posted by imashooter2 View Post
    Current data is just fine for both powders. Use with confidence.
    My vote for best answer. It is short, to the point and accurate.
    Disclaimer: The above is not holy writ. It is just my opinion based on my experience and knowledge. Your mileage may vary.

  10. #10
    Moderator


    Winger Ed.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Just outside Gun Barrel City, Texas
    Posts
    9,484
    Quote Originally Posted by SeabeeMan View Post
    Thank you all! I didn't realize those 2 in particular were so consistent across the years.
    They all are. If the formulation changes, so does the name.
    In school: We learn lessons, and are given tests.
    In life: We are given tests, and learn lessons.


    OK People. Enough of this idle chit-chat.
    This ain't your Grandma's sewing circle.
    EVERYONE!
    Back to your oars. The Captain wants to waterski.

  11. #11
    Boolit Buddy gumbo333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    NE by the Mighty Mo
    Posts
    409
    If you are going to shoot cast boolits get a copy of Lyman Cast Bullet Handbook - 1973. New copies are available on eBay. You won’t be sorry.
    Never trade luck for skill.

  12. #12
    Boolit Master

    SeabeeMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Spooner, WI
    Posts
    693
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gibson View Post
    "I know this stuff isn't necessarily equivalent to the modern Alliant powder,"

    So how is it you "know" that?
    Fair enough, I'm probably abusing the word "know" in that sentence. I "know" that repackaged powder, or that unsealed from any source other than what you purchased and have had in your possession, is potential for costly mistakes. There are also more examples of powder being renamed over the years without staying the same than I can keep track of. It's also very difficult to wade through the mixed opinions on what is chemically identical vs functional similar enough to use the same data. For example, H110/296 are identical as confirmed by the manufacturer, as far as I understand. But you can also find debate all around the interwebs, including this forum, that this old pulldown powder is the same as this canister powder, which is next to this on the burn chart, so use it with this data. Advice which is best taken with a healthy grain of salt.

    Heck, I even have some powder called ETR-7, which seems to be CSB-2, that while supplied with pressure data, indicates that it is safe to use another powders data. The price was right during one of the first runs on reloading supplies, but I even treated that as suspect and was careful with it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gibson View Post
    If you read it on a forum or in a magazine it is just someone's conjecture. Alliant says they have not changed.
    I appreciate the input and stating that you've compared pressures. Keep in mind that to somebody trying to do it right and be careful, reading on a forum about somebody who heard about it from the manufacturer is equivalent to conjecture. I started initially searching for some sort of Alliant press release stating this, but have never been able to find it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gibson View Post
    If you are basing your "know" on lower "max loads" in manuals today, then that is also an incorrect comparison. Many loads with all powders of all makes are most often lower in today's manuals because of the much better and much easier to use pressure measuring equipment used. Also, because today almost all manual loads adhere to SAAMI pressure standards. Where data is listed for a non SAAMI standardized cartridge the manual loads are usually conservative. Years ago, perhaps 30+ most manuals loaded the cartridges until "pressure signs" developed then they backed off a tudge and called that the "max load". Only a few actually pressure tested the loads and then because CUP testing is very time consuming and expensive. Due to liability and the availability of modern, easy to use pressure testing equipment most manuals, if they have developed their own loads, stick with SAAMI specifications. Alway be suspect of manuals with plagiarized load data as they don't say where it came from or if it was pressure tested.
    That I'm aware of, but it always warrants saying. I always start low and work up. Typically with pistols I'm just plinking, so I stay low to conserve powder and barrel life.

    Thanks for great advice and wording! The price was outstanding in normal times, but these were once in a lifetime kind of deals. Basically a couple of reloading setups that people were getting rid of. A couple of friends new some old timers who hadn't reloaded in years and wanted the stuff out of the way as they hadn't touched it in years. I worked out a price to purchase everything and in all cases, was very upfront about current prices and the market. No taking advantage of a grieving widow who didn't know what she had or anything like that. I offered to help them list and sell everything online rather than buy for myself, but they wanted it all gone to somebody they knew would use it. I let them set prices and threw extra in on top of it. I kept what I wanted, passed quite a bit on to a coworker who is just getting into reloading, and sold some locally to recoup my costs.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check