MidSouth Shooters SupplyTitan ReloadingReloading EverythingWideners
Inline FabricationLoad DataRepackboxLee Precision
RotoMetals2 Snyders Jerky
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Thread: Rossi 92 357 to 38/40

  1. #1
    Boolit Master veeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    510

    Rossi 92 357 to 38/40

    I have this little carbine 38/357 I bought for my wife years ago, just sits in the safe. I got to thinking the other day about having this one converted to 38/40 or perhaps 32/20.
    Which caliber would be the easiest and cheapest to convert, and where would I send it for the work to be done. Obviously the barrel would need boring, but the other things needing changing to accommodate the different caliber?

  2. #2
    Boolit Buddy Pereira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    "central" West TN
    Posts
    429
    Well the 32-20 is out unless you have lined as it is smaller in diameter.
    The other would as you said need to be bored.
    JES has done some 30-30 to 38-55 for a couple friends that were completely satisfied.
    Don't know about the bolt face work.

    RP


    Monte Walsh "You have No idea how little I care".

  3. #3
    Boolit Grand Master
    rockrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    5,329
    Might have to get a new bolt and mag tube and maybe lifter, and have it chambered to the 357-44 Bain and Davis. You wouldn't need a re-bore then. That said, to go to 38-40 you would need a re-bore/mag tube/new bolt possibly and possibly a new lifter.

  4. #4
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,224
    The .357 B&D conversion makes the most sense, to me. Ream the chamber to the new round, replace the .357 bolt with a .44 Magnum bolt, and some fitting, then you're done.
    The ONE trepidation I'd have is if you own and shoot .44 Special. I don't know if the .44 would fit in the new chamber, but it would likely be a disaster if one was fired therein.
    For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. Ecclesiastes 1:18
    He that troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind: and the fool become servant to the wise of heart. Proverbs 11:29
    ...Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of my brethren, ye have done it unto me. Matthew 25:40


    Carpe SCOTCH!

  5. #5
    Moderator
    Texas by God's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    14,446
    Far be it from me to discourage gun projects, but by handloading you can pretty much equal the 32-20 or 38-40 performance with the .357mag.

    Sent from my SM-A716U using Tapatalk

  6. #6
    Boolit Grand Master


    stubshaft's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Southernmost State of the Union
    Posts
    5,884
    What he said!
    Old enough to know better, young enough to do it anyway!

    Men who don't understand women fall into two categories: bachelors and husbands!

  7. #7
    Boolit Master veeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    510
    Thanks for the responses.

  8. #8
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    brisbane ,qld,australia
    Posts
    2,153
    I havent noted the old 38/40 WCF as having any excess of power,certainly not over 357 Mag.....and 32/20 is certainly a step in the opposite direction

  9. #9
    Boolit Master veeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    510
    Not a matter of power. Just a matter of I'm not a big fan of the 357, and was just thinking if it was and easy project, I'd make the change. Sounds like it's more trouble than it's worth.

  10. #10
    Boolit Grand Master
    Mk42gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Butler, MO
    Posts
    9,053
    If you really want a .38-40, in my opinion you will be money and probably time ahead to trade your current .357 for one.

    Robert

  11. #11
    Boolit Master smkummer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    So. Indiana
    Posts
    1,864
    You can get 180 and 195 grain bullets for the 357. They would sort of run neck and neck with hotter loadings of 38/40. 32/20 is taking a step way backwards. Both 32/20 and 38/40 brass are hard to find and expensive today when you do. 357 ( and 38 spec.) is easy to load, brass available everywhere, bullets and molds of all kinds, ammo available and can be loaded on carbide dies. It’s so easy to get it right the first time that some say it’s boring.

  12. #12
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    3,758
    Quote Originally Posted by veeman View Post
    I have this little carbine 38/357 I bought for my wife years ago, just sits in the safe. I got to thinking the other day about having this one converted to 38/40 or perhaps 32/20.
    Which caliber would be the easiest and cheapest to convert, and where would I send it for the work to be done. Obviously the barrel would need boring, but the other things needing changing to accommodate the different caliber?
    When you alter the case body size on a '92 you are taking on major surgery - I have not done a rossi - only done one winchester up from 25/20 to 38/40 - new lifter, cartridge guides (side rails), magazine stopper, bolt, bore out the magazine tube access in the action, gotta relieve the inside of the action ahead of the loading gate, new magazine tube, barrel band. It was a lot of work! which I enjoyed doing and am proud of completing properly . Going down to 32/20 would eliminate the most difficult stuff - but still gotta do the internals - the rebarrel is the easiest part of this.
    If you could buy the key internals for 32/20 (feed rails, magazine stopper, lifter ..................things would get a lot simpler) the left side feed rail comes with the magazine stopper attached. 32/20 on a unaltered 357 bolt ? proly get away with that?

    I reckon I would spend the energy making the 38/357 work nice ...357 mag makes a real neat blackpowder round with a LEE 158 gr flatpoint. I had a Rossi 357 - sold it to a mate (had too many lever guns and used the cash to relieve the wallet pain of my 1876) My Rossi was old - winchester parts fitted it.

    Yeah the tapered Winchester rounds feed better for sure. I have had a few in 32/20 and they all fed sweet, as the 38/40 does. But with the right combo a 357 will run good.

  13. #13
    Boolit Master veeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    510
    Yep, I got the message, not worth the trouble. Thanks for everyone's opinion.

  14. #14
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    3,758
    Quote Originally Posted by veeman View Post
    Yep, I got the message, not worth the trouble. Thanks for everyone's opinion.
    All depends.....I thought it was worth it (the one on the bottom of the pic) proly wouldnt do another one or I might ? would it pay ? heck no ! labour at Maccas rates I'd likely bought a new one - but I have something a bit unique

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	pair of 92's.jpeg 
Views:	30 
Size:	123.1 KB 
ID:	305768
    Last edited by indian joe; 10-17-2022 at 05:10 AM.

  15. #15
    Boolit Buddy muskeg13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Houston, Alaska
    Posts
    405
    I rebarreled a .44Mag Rossi M92 Puma to .38-40 back when I was doing a lot of cowboy action shooting with no major problems. It's not much of a jump in case sizes between .44 Mag and the .38WCF, so the internals worked with very little tweaking. I've since gone back and forth swapping barrels several times and it feeds either cartridge fine. FYI: In the mid-1990s it was hard to find .38-40 brass initially (Starline solved that eventually), so I used .44 Mag brass to form .38WCF for low pressure cowboy loads and got acceptable accuracy. .44 Mag bases are too small, but with stronger cases than .38WCF they worked ok, and there was no problem with extraction.

  16. #16
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lewiston, Idaho
    Posts
    2,741
    There are two different frames for the 92, the small caliber frame has a small mag tube opening and the inside is different size than the large caliber. Carrier is also different. Getting feed rails to work is a bit of fun. Best to trade for the caliber that you want. Best place to get info one the Rossi 92 is from Steves guns https://store.stevesgunz.com/index.p...e=products_all

  17. #17
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    3,758
    Quote Originally Posted by John Taylor View Post
    There are two different frames for the 92, the small caliber frame has a small mag tube opening and the inside is different size than the large caliber. Carrier is also different. Getting feed rails to work is a bit of fun. Best to trade for the caliber that you want. Best place to get info one the Rossi 92 is from Steves guns https://store.stevesgunz.com/index.p...e=products_all
    John
    which way did Rossi go with the 357 (dont have mine anymore) did they use the 44 frame or make a frame specific to the 357 cartridge.

    The 44 frame (winchester anyway) has the larger magazine tube hole plus an internal relief groove ahead of the loading gate to allow passage of the fatter rim - that was the most difficult part of the conversion for me - ended up with dremel tool sanding drums on a long extension in a normal electric drill in through the magazine tube hole .
    I had an original 44/40 to copy off - one thing I learned - every little nick and notch and bump in the innards of these things is there for a specific purpose and cutting corners does not work.

  18. #18
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lewiston, Idaho
    Posts
    2,741
    Quote Originally Posted by indian joe View Post
    John
    which way did Rossi go with the 357 (dont have mine anymore) did they use the 44 frame or make a frame specific to the 357 cartridge.

    The 44 frame (winchester anyway) has the larger magazine tube hole plus an internal relief groove ahead of the loading gate to allow passage of the fatter rim - that was the most difficult part of the conversion for me - ended up with dremel tool sanding drums on a long extension in a normal electric drill in through the magazine tube hole .
    I had an original 44/40 to copy off - one thing I learned - every little nick and notch and bump in the innards of these things is there for a specific purpose and cutting corners does not work.
    The only 92 that I converted to 357 was the smaller action. This was well over 45 years ago and I said I would never do another one. A fellow came into the shop with just the action so I had to get the barrel, mag tube and wood. There was no internet so finding parts was almost impossible. The mag tube was made from a piece of oil tube. I don't know where I got the barrel blank but it may have been from Douglas. The wood came from Numrich and had some kind of medallion on the side. When I got done I told the customer $200 and he told me he could buy a new rifle for less so I ended up owning it. I ended up trading it for a chainsaw. The biggest problem was getting the feed rails to work .
    The carrier on the two sizes is different.

  19. #19
    Boolit Grand Master FergusonTO35's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Boonesborough, KY
    Posts
    6,964
    Quote Originally Posted by veeman View Post
    Yep, I got the message, not worth the trouble. Thanks for everyone's opinion.
    I admire your dedication to obsolete cartridges, there just comes a point where it's easier to buy a gun already chambered in the cartridge. Doesn't Rossi make a 92 in .44-40? All that would require is a barrel change or liner.
    Currently casting and loading: .32 Auto, .380 Auto, .38 Special, 9X19, .357 Magnum, .257 Roberts, 6.5 Creedmoor, .30 WCF, .308 WCF, .45-70.

  20. #20
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    181
    If you have to have a 38-40 start with a 45 colt and most of the headaches are gone. That was the advice given me about converting something to 38-40. (Colt Lightning copy). I still have the barrel and the rifle (still in 45colt) and moved on. I didn't give up on the 38-40. I have 3 Marlin 1894s, an Italian low wall, and a Remington 14 1/2 pump along with 2 Uberti Cattelman and the Ruger convertible so I'm not missing out.
    I'd look for a 92 in 45colt or 44-40 and hope they were looking for a 357.
    Come to think about it I have the GM barrel and a 45colt and 44-40 Rossi 92 that would make an easy winter project only problem my lathe doesn't cut metric.
    Add another to the to-do list!
    Bill
    Last edited by wwmartin; 10-18-2022 at 09:57 AM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check