WidenersSnyders JerkyReloading EverythingTitan Reloading
Lee PrecisionRepackboxLoad DataInline Fabrication
MidSouth Shooters Supply RotoMetals2
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 42 of 42

Thread: Seating to crimp groove vs powder charge

  1. #41
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South Western NC
    Posts
    3,820
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gibson View Post
    That was the myth for many, many years. I believed it too because it sounds reasonable. Problem is, it doesn't work out that way in reality. I've spent a lot of time, effort and expense trying to determine, by actually measuring the pressures, that cast/lead bullets give less pressure with the same loads as does jacketed bullets of the same weight, seating depth and bearing surface. I've done this with numerous handgun and rifle cartridges. Best I have come up with as to which will give the greater pressure for a given load is; it depends. What exactly it "depends on" I haven't found a concrete answer for. Thus, based on actual pressure testing that theory is not provable.

    If you have any empirical data based on the actual measurement of pressures demonstrating such, I would certainly appreciate seeing it.
    Larry, you've mentioned your interesting pressure experiments several times in the past but I'm puzzled about how you did those tests. I mean, for handgun loads, did you only have a pressure test gun with short throats and tight chambered barrels for everything or did you have some kind of common real world long throat and cylinder gap barrels for revolver loads?

    What I'm wondering about, might the very short throats of autoloader test barrels vs. the real world long throats and cylinder gaps of revolvers account for the significant pressure differences you found (or computed?) between shallow vs. deep seated revolver loads?

  2. #42
    Boolit Buddy Hi-Speed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Northern Nevada
    Posts
    354
    Quote Originally Posted by Larry Gibson View Post
    We're not going to get any "pressure signs" at 38 SPL pressure levels. If you do then you are probably above 357 Magnum pressure levels.

    However, this is where the chronograph comes in handy. If you're using a different bullet than the manual, then drop back and work up to the same velocity level as the manual load. Not necessarily precisely accurate pressure wise but if all the other components, particularly the powder, then you'll still be within safe pressures.
    Larry is spot on. This is my practice too and the chronograph is an indispensable tool for this. An example - using Speer 38 Spl +P load data their max load for the 158 gr SWC is 6.0 grs using Power Pistol. I start at 10% below and work up…I’ve had 5.6 grs Power Pistol come close to the Speer 6.0 grs Power Pistol manual load velocity in my revolvers as extrapolated for barrel length…stop there.
    “Start Low, Work Up Slow”

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check