Load DataWidenersSnyders JerkyRotoMetals2
RepackboxReloading EverythingInline FabricationTitan Reloading
Lee Precision MidSouth Shooters Supply
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 89

Thread: RCBS .44-250-K vs .44-250-KT

  1. #21
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    628
    [QUOTE=Shuz;5386752]
    Quote Originally Posted by GLL View Post
    Shuz:



    Interesting that you, alamogunr, and I all joined this site back in March of 2005.

    Jerry,
    I and perhaps you and alamogunr were also members on the old "Shooters" website?
    As was I. My join dat shows as March 2005 also.

  2. #22
    Boolit Master

    alamogunr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    4,509
    [QUOTE=txbirdman;5386764]
    Quote Originally Posted by Shuz View Post

    As was I. My join dat shows as March 2005 also.
    As I recall, I jumped over here because the old site was shutting down. I was really happy to see a site dedicated to cast bullets. Up to that time I got most of my information from the old CB_L(I think that is correct) email group. Unlike a lot of members here I've only been casting for a little over 20 years.
    John
    W.TN

  3. #23
    Boolit Master

    376Steyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    South Idaho
    Posts
    1,483
    Quote Originally Posted by Bazoo View Post
    I’d like to have one of the original moulds for that 429421, like every Keith fan I guess. My question is, who makes a copy of that bullet? I mean, an exact copy.
    You might like this one: https://noebulletmolds.com/site/prod...2-255-swc-ay3/
    Remember: Ammo will get you through times of no money better than money will get you through times of no ammo.

  4. #24
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    9
    The accurate 43-250j is advertised as an exact clone.

  5. #25
    Boolit Grand Master Bazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Cecilia, Kentucky
    Posts
    6,785
    Quote Originally Posted by 376Steyr View Post
    Thanks for the suggestion but,
    No thanks. It doesn’t have three equal length driving bands. The bottom is .120 and the top and middle are .080.

    I meant to say, I like the look of GLLs vintage 429421 and I’d like one of those.

  6. #26
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,401

  7. #27
    Boolit Master

    alamogunr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    4,509
    Since a lot of this thread centers around what defines a "Keith" bullet and, aside from the equal drive bands, the square lube groove catches most of the attention. I recently read an article or comment, not sure where, that put forward the argument that the rounded lube groove is not as bad in actual practice as those who have set the square groove up as equal to absolute gospel would have us believe. In searching for that holy grail mold that is the one and only Keith mold, I understand the need to find an old Lyman 429421 with the square lube groove.

    I don't remember the details but it centered around the behavior of the bullet when it obturates and compresses the lube groove. The explanation sounded plausible enough that, for my use, I wouldn't care either way. Also, for many who powder coat, it is completely unimportant.
    John
    W.TN

  8. #28
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Callicoon, NY
    Posts
    784
    I would think that boolits from a rounded or tapered lube groove mold would release and drop easier than from a squared groove mold.

  9. #29
    Boolit Grand Master Bazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Cecilia, Kentucky
    Posts
    6,785
    Round lube grooves are not a detriment that I can tell. Square grooves hold lube better through handling, just between the sizer and the case. But I also store my bullets lubed. Maybe not huge amounts, just several hundreds.

  10. #30
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    212
    NOEs Keith mold is the 432-277 I believe, These were the signature Keith molds from the group buy here mines great equal drive bands.

  11. #31
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,401

  12. #32
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,401
    Keith's 250 Keith never weighed 277 grains.

  13. #33
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    212
    I don’t know what weight his mold dropped at, never got to borrow it!!!! ��

  14. #34
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,401
    Quote Originally Posted by danmat View Post
    I don’t know what weight his mold dropped at, never got to borrow it!!!! ��
    Him saying 250 sure isn't 277. Unless he was using new math at the time

  15. #35
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    212
    Maybe originally lineotype, much speculation on a “real” Keith mold.
    The one thing most agree on is square lube groove, plain base, with equal driving bands.
    My Noe is a fine mold I don’t mind the little extra weight though

  16. #36
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,401
    Quote Originally Posted by danmat View Post
    Maybe originally lineotype, much speculation on a “real” Keith mold.
    The one thing most agree on is square lube groove, plain base, with equal driving bands.
    My Noe is a fine mold I don’t mind the little extra weight though
    I would say, at the time the chances of Keith using Linotype is very, very, very,very, very, very slim. Since he mentions 1-16 tin and lead as much as he does.

  17. #37
    Boolit Grand Master Bazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Cecilia, Kentucky
    Posts
    6,785
    I’m sure Elmer used whatever he could get just like we all do. It’s just for his pet loads he wanted 16:1. But I magine he would use softer for the gallery or target loads and for other calibers as he had need and reserve the 16:1 for his pet loads whenever he was running a bit low.

    He said in sixguns that during the depression things was tight and he couldn’t afford pistol powder and was using shotgun powder out of necessity for some light loads. I believe that’s what he shot the mountain lion with. I’m sure he did the same with lead though I’ve not seen that in his writings yet.
    Last edited by Bazoo; 04-11-2022 at 11:25 AM.

  18. #38
    Boolit Grand Master Bazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Cecilia, Kentucky
    Posts
    6,785
    My 44-250-K weighs 265 with 50:50 ww: pb+Sn and lubed. I’d like a 250ish so I’m on the hunt. It that the heavy is bad, but, I don’t know I just want 250ish.

  19. #39
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Bazoo View Post
    I’m sure Elmer used whatever he could get just like we all do. It’s just for his pet loads he wanted 16:1. But I magine he would use softer for the gallery or target loads and for other calibers as he had need and reserve the 16:1 for his pet loads whenever he was running a bit low.

    He said in sixguns that during the depression things was tight and he couldn’t afford pistol powder and was using shotgun powder out of necessity for some light loads. I believe that’s what he shot the mountain lion with. I’m sure he didn’t the same with lead though I’ve not seen that in his writings yet.
    So with that being said, we can assume as humans do, he used 1-16.
    Never in his writings about alloys he used in his earliest days can you find he said he used Linotype or Printers Metal as he called it.

  20. #40
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,324
    Quote Originally Posted by Bazoo View Post
    I’m sure Elmer used whatever he could get just like we all do. It’s just for his pet loads he wanted 16:1. But I magine he would use softer for the gallery or target loads and for other calibers as he had need and reserve the 16:1 for his pet loads whenever he was running a bit low.

    He said in sixguns that during the depression things was tight and he couldn’t afford pistol powder and was using shotgun powder out of necessity for some light loads. I believe that’s what he shot the mountain lion with. I’m sure he didn’t the same with lead though I’ve not seen that in his writings yet.
    Pure lead and tin were a lot more prevalent back in Elmer's time, especially where he lived. He advocated the binary alloy in most all his cast bullets. Both my Lyman 429421 mould and my RCBS 44-250-KT moulds drop bullets of 16-1 alloy at 250 gr +/-. Keith's "classic" 44 Magnum load of 22 gr 2400 was with 250 gr bullet. Some, when they load that under 270 +/- gr "Keith" bullets complain Alliant 2400 is "hotter'. Ya think? I wonder why........
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check