Titan ReloadingWidenersLoad DataReloading Everything
MidSouth Shooters SupplyInline FabricationLee PrecisionRotoMetals2
Repackbox Snyders Jerky
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 46 of 46

Thread: Loading for a Zoli 1863 replica rifle

  1. #41
    Boolit Master Ithaca Gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Between two mountains
    Posts
    1,602
    I believe the P58 to be the pinnacle of the muzzle loading military rifle!

    Here's mine, a fine condition 1861, (Royal Marine Artillery short rifle version).

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	a7pqUPsl.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	32.4 KB 
ID:	294194
    Liberalism is a cult divorced from reality.

  2. #42
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Out in the sticks of NC
    Posts
    158
    [QUOTE=indian joe;5330551]
    Quote Originally Posted by Ithaca Gunner View Post
    All I can say is, they did well enough with the 1:72 twist in the Springfields and the Brits did pretty well indeed with the 1:78 twist in their Enfields. The Royal Navy DID teach us all a few things with their P58 with the 1:48 twist, so much so the Royal Army adopted it in 1860/1861 for their short rifles. The P58 Naval rifle was so good in fact, every one of them bought by the Confederacy went to their sharp-shooters. They were starting to figure it out, but still the standard infantry weapons were still slow twist...and still, my Fayetteville with the 1:72 twist turns in good scores at 100yds. Good as any P58 I ever shot. The P58 will do much better at longer ranges, but up to 2-300yds. I doubt there's much real difference.

    So at least you not gonna tell me my preference for the 48 twist p58 is wrong ?
    I wouldn't say that the preference for the P58 is wrong. I shoot a P58 in competition BUT there are differences. Just because another rifle has a slower twist, when shooting minies doesn't necessarily mean it's going to be a handicap at ranges out to 100yd. When looking at a P58 v 1863 Contract aka "Zouave", there are ergonomic differences. P58- sight radius is shorter, rear sight is closer to muzzle, stock shape is "odd" from what most Americans are used to. I have a 1862 Colt contract that is the 2 band version of the Springfield. Both it and my P58 shoot equally well in competition. Both shoot one hole groups at 50yd. So why do I prefer the P58? Simple, it has post and notch sights whereas my Springfield has a peep. In N-SSA competition, it's entirely possible that the range will be obscured by smoke making sighting challenging with a post and notch and nearly impossible with a peep. So I put up with the weird stock shape to keep sights clear.
    A man cannot have too much red wine, too many books, or too much ammunition.
    Rudyard Kipling


    Palmetto Sharpshooters
    North South Skirmish Association
    NRA Muzzleloading Instructor

  3. #43
    Boolit Master Ithaca Gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Between two mountains
    Posts
    1,602
    For my aging eyes the sight on the P58 seems a benefit rather than a handicap. I always fit right into the Enfield stock until I injured my shoulder last year, now just trying to shoulder one is painful. My favorite shooter from my N-SSA days is a Windsor Enfield with a Hoyt 1:60 liner, that gun never disappointed me. Another is a 1862 Fayetteville I swapped a rolling block for, ''Lewie'' on 2nd VA. Inf made it with a Whitacre 1:72 barrel. Both shoot great with 55gr. FFFg under a Lyman 575213OS. Behind me right now is an 1863 Springfield with a 1:48 Hoyt liner that needs a trigger job and possibly the barrel bedded. I only shot it once so far and it didn't perform up to standards. A P-H Musketoon 1:48 finishes out my collection.

    The only one I've shot out to 300yds. was the Windsor, and it did very well. Claud E. Fuller's book, ''The Rifled Musket'' holds a treasure, about 1/3 of the book is a copy of targets shot with various long arms used in the Civil War, shot by soldiers using issue ammunition at ranges out to 500yds. Some targets shot by squad on command, others shot by what seems the best individual shot. Over-all, these guns were good as were the men who shot them. They knew what they were doing, better guns hadn't been developed yet. It's easy for us to look back and nit-pick, imagine what was good and bad, but the men who used them didn't have that advantage, they made them work.
    Liberalism is a cult divorced from reality.

  4. #44
    Boolit Mold Rifledude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    12
    Hellgate: yes it is a three groove barrel, and you're correct that it is a booger to try to measure, and I don't have pin gauges that large. I have a couple of mini molds coming, and made up some .575 round balls today that fit snugly into the bore nestled in their lubed patch. So as the man said: "We'll soon see".

  5. #45
    Boolit Master Ithaca Gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Between two mountains
    Posts
    1,602
    Call around to machine shops in your area and ask if they will measure it with pin gauges for you, if they have them. I have a collection of sizing dies from .574-.580 and just use sized boolits to measure them, but I have multiple guns to justify the expense.
    Liberalism is a cult divorced from reality.

  6. #46
    Boolit Mold Rifledude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Posts
    12
    smithnframe, It appears to be 1-60".

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check