Charlieb, thanks for sharing your experience. Difficulty loading is a hurdle. Probably be a problem with most 45acp bullets.
Charlieb, thanks for sharing your experience. Difficulty loading is a hurdle. Probably be a problem with most 45acp bullets.
Edward, pure lead certainly opens up the possibilities. I am a bit worried about trying to shave way too much lead and/or deforming the bullet!
I suppose if i end up with a mold or two that are only really good for 45acp rounds its no tragedy.
If not a gas check slug.. could maybe put the bullet to an outside diameter chamfer tool.
Also.. check your cylinders.. some have chamfered mouths that instead of shaving lead.. actually swage them. I have an 1858 like that. You can seat a .454 ball them pull it to look, and it has a wide shiny band around it.. no shaved ring.. but rather swaged to fit with a 1/8" shiny sealed band around the ball. This was a kit gun.. not a finished piece etc.. so milage may vary...
1. Will they fit in the loading port under the ram . . . (If not removing cylinder to load)
2. Will they drop at the right diameter to insure a slight shear so they fit tight in the chamber (.454 minimum usually)
3. You never know till you try!
My Armi San Paulo/Euroarms Remingtons (in both 36 & 44 cal) have chamfered chamber mouths and indeed, do swage the ball or bullet used. Never a shaved ring. The Armi San Marcos and Ubertis shave rings unless I have chamfered the cylinder mouths to prevent ball migration when fired: some chambers will shave lead rings without making a good seal but chamfering them swages and seals better.
Hellgate in Orygun
With 16+revolvers, I've been called the Imelda Marcos of cap&ball.
If you do not subscribe to a newspaper you are uninformed. If you do subscribe to a newspaper you are misinformed. Mark Twain
”We know they are lying, they know they are lying, they know we know they are lying, we know they know we know they are lying, yet they are still lying.” –Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn
I agree I'd rather have a slightly tighter cylinder but with a chamfered mouth that would swage that ball all the way with a nice wide ring
The old Lyman #45266 (AKA 452066) bevel base SWC works good in Dragoons and Walkers.
I used to load 200gr SWC bullets in an ASM 1860. The mold has a bevel base, and I chambered the chamber mouths. They were quite accurate. I may get a 165 mold and try it.
I tried mine some time ago and they didn't work, didn't clear the space to rotate under the ram. I have the 1851, dragoon, walker, Remington 1858, colt 1860. I finally bought a 250 gr heeled bullet from accurate and the Johnson and dow from eras gone.
“It is not enough that we do our best; sometimes we must do what is required.”
― Winston S. Churchill
So, what would happen if you used something like the cast LEE 90350 bullet (.452/230 gr), loaded backwards?
I would expect the round nose to drop into the cylinder, with the first band sitting on the mouth of the chamber. This should provide clearance to rotate under the ram.
The powder charge would "see" a convex spherical surface, just as if you had loaded a round ball.
The other end of the bullet (now the forward end) would have a "wadcutter" profile.
"Commerce with all nations, alliance with none, should be our motto."
- Thomas Jefferson
There's a really easy way to "heel" any conventional .45 cal cast pistol boolit for use in C&B revolvers. All it takes is to remove the decapping stem from a .308/7x57/8x57/7.65x53/.30-06 sizing die, mount it in your press and put a Lee push-through stem from a boolit sizer die in the ram. Insert your lubed cast boolit base-first into the die and push it in deep enough that the base driving band is reduced to .445 or so and it will drop right into your repro's ~.447 chambers. You'll need a long punch in through the top of the die and a dead-blow to pop them back out. The remaining driving bands will still be over chamber diameter and seat tightly. I use a Lee 8x57 die for this and the hole in the top will pass a 5/16" punch which doesn't ding up the soft booilts.
I've used a H&I sizing die, just not pushing the boolit all the way into the die.
Ruger suggests using a 0.454 bullet in the old army while recommending a .457 round ball. I found that using a SPG lubed 45 bullet sized to fit the cylinders with no wad works fine. In my case a 0.454 RCBS 45-250 FP over 35 gr of 3f black fits all cylinders just snug enough to be good without shaving.
Steve,
Life Member NRA
Colorado Rifle Club member
Rocky Mtn Gun Owners member
NAGR member
Regarding the idea of a purpose-built die for heeling boolits, I plan to have one or two made, but there are a few different approaches. A 7/8-14 swage die to produce a two-diameter boolit after it's been conventionally sized and lubed, which also has the advantage of whatever custom nose configuration I care to have nose punches made for (thinking HP here). Another is a two-diameter H&I die which can be used to size, lube and produce a heel in the same tool, but it will still be a two-step operation, one to size and lube, another to back off the stop screw on the lube sizer so the heel band can be forced down into the minor diameter to produce the heel. Either can be used to convert pistol boolits from any conventional mold. I lean in this direction, which is no doubt, cheaper. Now, I'll habe to decide what heel diameter I need. Most of my C&B activity is with paper cartridges, so the heel should be .004-.005 under chamber diameter to allow the heel to drop in with the paper around it. On the other hand, using the 8x57 die allows me to already have whatever diameter I need. I may just sit tight for now. . . . .
I was trying to figure out how this would work with a swaging die. In order to put the heel on the bullet there would have to be a recess cut into the bottom punch for the ogive die. I think with the pressure needed to completely form the base of the bullet you would have to run the lead fully into the die and would be stuck with whatever ogive you have the die made in.
This is with my experience with Dave Corbins "S" Press system.
Last edited by Sasquatch-1; 11-28-2021 at 10:04 AM.
A vote for anyone other then the conservative candidates is a vote for the liberal candidates.
As someone noted above, reproduction revolvers don't always have a geometry to allow you to get any given bullet started straight. And, Pietta and Uberti have had very different ideas on what diameters should be used for their chambers. What it boils down to is each piece, be it alleged to be a Dance, a Walker, a Dragoon, 1851, 1858, 1860, 1861, .36 or .44 is a rule unto itself and has to be fed what it demands. But hey, cartridge revolvers are the same way. Percussion revolvers just have the advantage of using caseless ammunition!
This illustrates a design I started using in the 1970's in a 1861 marketed by Navy Arms with .370" diameter chambers. The mold started out as a Lee 9mm round nose. It slips into the chambers, it shoots great. Try to do the same thing scaled up to .44 and you'd probably be trying to move around too much lead.
This is a hobby and when reloading for a revolver I enjoy tinkering around, and because of that I don't like being limited in the number of molds that can be used. So from my side the real problem is that revolvers aren't made to use the off the shelf molds.
BP | Bronze Point | IMR | Improved Military Rifle | PTD | Pointed |
BR | Bench Rest | M | Magnum | RN | Round Nose |
BT | Boat Tail | PL | Power-Lokt | SP | Soft Point |
C | Compressed Charge | PR | Primer | SPCL | Soft Point "Core-Lokt" |
HP | Hollow Point | PSPCL | Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" | C.O.L. | Cartridge Overall Length |
PSP | Pointed Soft Point | Spz | Spitzer Point | SBT | Spitzer Boat Tail |
LRN | Lead Round Nose | LWC | Lead Wad Cutter | LSWC | Lead Semi Wad Cutter |
GC | Gas Check |