WidenersMidSouth Shooters SupplyLoad DataInline Fabrication
Lee PrecisionTitan ReloadingRepackboxRotoMetals2
Reloading Everything
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: .44 Magnum COAL - in Carbines?

  1. #1
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    State of Denial
    Posts
    4,212

    .44 Magnum COAL - in Carbines?

    Contemplating tweaking one of a couple existing bullet designs with Accurate. Basically looking to end up with a 250-265 grain LFN in a tumble lube format. Primary launch platforms will be Redhawks, a SBH, and an N-frame.

    Veral Smith's site says I can get away with a nose length of .45" in front of the case mouth on all of those. No problem - I'm probably looking at something like .41" and under.

    My concern is that this stretches us beyond the "book" max COAL of 1.61" and creeps us up to near 1.7".

    I am not opposed to the idea of acquiring a Marlin lever gun or one of the Ruger 77/44 bolt actions to shoot my revolver ammo out of, but don't know what length they let you get away with. The classic Keith clone I'm looking at the blueprint of would kick the COAL up to about 1.685", and I have trouble imagining ANY carbine manufacturer with a lick of sense cranking out a gun that wouldn't work with that.

    So. . .how long can you go on the carbines before they choke?
    Last edited by Bigslug; 09-21-2021 at 10:31 PM. Reason: Bad Math!
    WWJMBD?

    In the Land of Oz, we cast with wheel weight and 2% Tin, Man.

  2. #2
    Boolit Grand Master Outpost75's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    over the hill, out in the woods and far away
    Posts
    10,158
    My experience has been that in the Marlin 1894, original Winchester 1892, later Winchester 94, and Ruger M77/.44 that cartridge OAL in .44 Magnum cannot exceed 1.610" which is the ordinary max. for factory ammo, AND you can take that to the bank.
    The ENEMY is listening.
    HE wants to know what YOU know.
    Keep it to yourself.

  3. #3
    Boolit Master



    ddixie884's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Avery, Texas
    Posts
    1,309
    Me too. The marlin can be tweaked by a good smith..........
    JMHO-YMMV
    dd884
    gary@2texastrucks.com
    Gary D. Peek

  4. #4
    Boolit Grand Master



    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Southwestern Ohio
    Posts
    8,456
    Back in the day, when I was but a lad, I was a real fan of Elmer Keith (I still am, to keep the record straight). However, I was a bit "over the top" when it came to Elmer's bullet design. I am still a fan, for a variety of reasons, but at that time in my young life, if it wasn't an "Elmer" bullet, I wasn't interested. I was a .44 Magnum fan (and still am) and was NOT interested in any other cast bullet. Really closed mind, to be sure. I bought a Marlin lever action chambered in .44 Magnum (at that time my home state of Ohio did not permit hunting deer with a handgun, hence the purchase of the Marlin). My Marlin would not feed the .44 Magnum with the Keith bullet at ANY length. I checked around and learned that that SWC bullet design just didn't work with the Marlin. Instead of an intelligent decision, I decided that any .44 Magnum rifle that wouldn't feed the Keith bullet in .44 Magnum wasn't fit to own! Just a flat DUMB decision.

    After some more experience, a few scant years later, I realized that a good "round flat" design of cast bullet will feed without issue in a Marlin and also does well in the field. In fact, when Frank Siefer (a Lee Distributor and good friend) and I designed the Lee C430-310-RF, we carefully put two crimp grooves in the bullet. The groove closest to the nose was to keep the overall length suitable for rifles such as the Marlin and Ruger .44 Magnum rifles. The one closest to the base allowed a maximum overall length to keep more of the bullet outside the case to keep the pressures down for revolvers. This particular bullet design turned out to be the most accurate bullet at 100 yards out of a revolver that I have ever shot.

    This bullet was developed for Frank's Alaska bear hunting trip but as luck would have it, I happened to take the first head of big game that was taken with that bullet. I took a very large ten point buck in Ohio with a handgun. The wound track was impressive and that bullet is EXCELLENT in the field. However, I decided after using it for a bit, that the recoil was really a bit too heavy for the early Smith Model 29's. It was NOT the pressure that was a particular concern, but the recoil was too hard on the those fine revolvers. So, later on, I used mine only in my Rugers (Super Blackhawk and Ruger Red Hawk).

    So, the bottom line is don't waste your time trying to get a Marlin to feed the Keith bullet. You may be able to make it work, but any popular RF will probably be handled quite well. It will also do well on game.

    FWIW
    Dale53

  5. #5
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Mentone, Alabama
    Posts
    1,139
    Quote Originally Posted by Dale53 View Post
    After some more experience, a few scant years later, I realized that a good "round flat" design of cast bullet will feed without issue in a Marlin and also does well in the field. In fact, when Frank Siefer (a Lee Distributor and good friend) and I designed the Lee C430-310-RF, we carefully put two crimp grooves in the bullet FWIW Dale53
    That is very interesting. Back in the early 2000's I took a Lee 430-310-RF and milled the gas check shank off and ended up with a bullet that weighs ~250 grains and have used it successfully in both 44 Magnum single shot rifles and with sabot's in 50 cal muzzle loaders. My compliments to your design, it is a great bullet.

    As to the 1.710 length of the Keith design feeding through a lever rifle, I run the NOE copy, which I consider to be a faithful copy at 1.710 and it feeds well through my Rossi '92

  6. #6
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    State of Denial
    Posts
    4,212
    Currently guesstimating a .38" long LFN-type nose outside the case with a .30" meplat. Probably a COAL around 1.66", so nothing over the top. Might work, might not.

    As with so many other little projects, the answer on the fateful day a carbine comes home may be "order another mold"
    WWJMBD?

    In the Land of Oz, we cast with wheel weight and 2% Tin, Man.

  7. #7
    Boolit Master smkummer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    So. Indiana
    Posts
    1,861
    My mid-70’s Marlin 1894 does the Marlin jam unless my OAL is close to 1.61 or over. And also so with a friends similar Marlin. I am crimping Lee’s 200 RF on the second groove for a 1.635 OAL ( fast shooting cowboy action) and Ranch Dogs 265 gr. at also the second groove ( micro groove on both) at 1.65 OAL. I can’t use the recommended crimp groove on either bullet or it will Marlin jam. Most likely my gun needs tweaking but just saying that my gun at least feeds a 1.65 OAL bullet.

  8. #8
    Boolit Grand Master
    rintinglen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Orange, VA NOW
    Posts
    6,491
    My Marlin CB likes 1.55-1.61 inches, where it purrs. Shorter rounds, especially SWC's tend to hang up while feeding and longer rounds won't clear the magazine.
    _________________________________________________It's not that I can't spell: it is that I can't type.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check