RotoMetals2Reloading EverythingWidenersLoad Data
RepackboxMidSouth Shooters SupplyInline FabricationTitan Reloading
Lee Precision
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Mixed Small Shot Sizes for Snakes and Rats?

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mtns. of SW Virginia
    Posts
    220

    Mixed Small Shot Sizes for Snakes and Rats?

    Just a curiosity question, as I expect someone has tried it already -

    Would there be any advantage to mixing small shot sizes (I'm thinking #9 and #12) to increase the load density and mid-range (6-15 feet or so) effectiveness of handgun shotshells on snakes and rats, and such? #12 to partially fill the voids between the #9 and increase the density, #9 for more mass and penetration? I'm thinking this would matter more in the smaller shells than the larger.

    Probably some computer genius could model this out and tell us what the most effective mix for any diameter shell would be based on a perfect matrix. Me, I'm thinking I'll pour some into a shot capsule so I can see what's going on, and weigh the different charges. But if someone's already tried this, I have other ideas that are equally trivial wastes of time. Haha!

    Thanks, everyone,
    Regan
    Running the ridges and riding the rivers of the Southwest Virginia Appalachians

  2. #2
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    3,572
    sounds like an interesting idea, definitely worth trying.
    don't know anything about computer modeling, but old pizza box or other cardboard or scraps of wood are pretty good ways to check shot pattern.

  3. #3
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Mansfield, PA
    Posts
    725
    Regan,

    What caliber shot loads are you reloading? Here on my rural PA farm in snake country, I never needed anything but #6 or #7.5 shot in .38 Special, .357, .44 Special or ,44 Magnum and a proper dose of Unique. Most handguns have rifled barrels so shot disperses rapidly. My shot loads are a powder charge, a gas check cup up and a dose of shot and another gas check cup down and a roll crimp.

    All my rattlers and copperheads tied themselves in knots at 10-15 feet with #6 or #7.5 shot. I have never seen #12 shot for sale and would never consider "dust shot" worth the effort.

    Adam

  4. #4
    Boolit Grand Master
    Mk42gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Butler, MO
    Posts
    9,021
    I don't think it would be worth the effort, for a couple of reasons:

    1. Shotloads from rifled handguns are a very short ranged proposition. We're talking 15-20 feet max. It doesn't take much range for the rifling to spin patterns into oblivion.

    2. Everything I have ever read on the subject of mixed shot says to load the heavier pellets towards the front. In theory they don't slow down as fast as the small shot, and will blow patterns when they push through the cloud of small stuff.

    I have never shot a rat or any other mammal with a shot load, but I have done in several slithery things. It doesn't take a lot of hits to get a snake to curl up in a writhing ball giving you time to get another shot if needed. More hits are obviously better here, so small shot for pattern density is better in my experience.

    BPI sells 10 pound bags of #12 shot, which for most people is a more than lifetime supply, (as long as you don't lose it). Keeping in mind the extremely short range possible, I stick with #12. If a snake is further than about fifteen feet, he really isn't a problem.

    Robert

  5. #5
    Boolit Master

    Electrod47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    638
    I have been doing loading shotshells for my hand guns since the seventies. Poor man style. Since they came out with the Speer shot cups I have stuck with them and 12# shot. Bit the bullet years ago with BPI and got the 10lber. ( not a very big bag anyway ) Using the 6# and 7# would kill snakes OK but, many would need an extra shot. with the 12# they are really shredded. Here in MS I live in the country near water and I kill a half dozen each summer in the yard.
    “You should tell someone what you know. There should be a history, so that men can learn from it.

    He smiled. “Men do not learn from history. Each generation believes itself brighter than the last, each believes it can survive the mistakes of the older ones. Each discovers each old thing and they throw up their hands and say ‘See! Look what I have found! Look upon what I know!’ And each believes it is something new.

    Louis L’Amour

    The Californios

  6. #6
    Boolit Grand Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Northern Michigan
    Posts
    8,901
    Quote Originally Posted by Mk42gunner View Post
    I don't think it would be worth the effort, for a couple of reasons:

    1. Shotloads from rifled handguns are a very short ranged proposition. We're talking 15-20 feet max. It doesn't take much range for the rifling to spin patterns into oblivion.

    2. Everything I have ever read on the subject of mixed shot says to load the heavier pellets towards the front. In theory they don't slow down as fast as the small shot, and will blow patterns when they push through the cloud of small stuff.

    I have never shot a rat or any other mammal with a shot load, but I have done in several slithery things. It doesn't take a lot of hits to get a snake to curl up in a writhing ball giving you time to get another shot if needed. More hits are obviously better here, so small shot for pattern density is better in my experience.

    BPI sells 10 pound bags of #12 shot, which for most people is a more than lifetime supply, (as long as you don't lose it). Keeping in mind the extremely short range possible, I stick with #12. If a snake is further than about fifteen feet, he really isn't a problem.

    Robert
    Robert made a good point...a snake 15 ft away is not an eminent threat.

    One other consideration....rocks, gravel, and such. Larger shot will have more energy if it comes back at you. I wear glasses all the time so have some protection but others do not.
    Don Verna


  7. #7
    Boolit Buddy


    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    Green Swamp, FL
    Posts
    198
    #9 works fine for me in 45 acp in the 1911. Took a little trial and error to get them to cycle, #9 does fine out to 10'. 3 moccasins so far this year.

  8. #8
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Mansfield, PA
    Posts
    725
    Don Verna makes a fine Safety Point: Always wear eye protection when using any shot loads. At my club several years ago we had a member blind himself in one eye when his #8 shot load bounced back in his face from a hardwood target back board.

    Adam

  9. #9
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brushy Mountains of NC
    Posts
    1,333
    Years ago I stumbled across about a pint of #9 shot, worked on anything a pistol load should be used for. The rifling does make a mess of the pattern. I take the exact same load for a 38 spcl. load it in a .410 shot shell and better than triple the range.

  10. #10
    Boolit Buddy

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mtns. of SW Virginia
    Posts
    220
    Thanks for the pointers, folks, especially about wearing glasses! Luckily I wear prescription glasses, and always get the polycarbonate lenses in case I'm doing something unexpected and don't have a chance to put on safety glasses.

    I've always used gas-check-type shot loads in my .45 Colt, but am thinking to experiment some with .45ACP in a 1911 and maybe a .32 H&R Magnum trail gun, just for the heck of it. Jsm180, I'd be real interested in what load cycles your 1911, if you care to share?

    Agreed, snakes are not a danger at a distance, but sometimes I need to weed out poisonous snakes right around the homestead that I can't get real close to. I don't bother them out in the woods away from my place. Small shot works great, but loses energy; larger shot carries more momentum but loses density... which led to my pondering mixed charges. Good point about the heavy shot up front, Mk42gunner - I'd not heard that.

    Sometimes I have to shoot birds or small mammals inside barns or sheds - the #12 is less likely to bounce around, and less likely to tear up tin, aluminum, or anything I accidentally hit. Sure, it's a short-range proposition - my serious shotgunning of varmints is done with a 10-bore side-by-side! Just kidding, it's only a 12...

    Thanks again for the discussion! I'll let you know if I get around to trying out any mixed loads, and how they do.

    Take care!
    Running the ridges and riding the rivers of the Southwest Virginia Appalachians

  11. #11
    Boolit Grand Master
    Mk42gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Butler, MO
    Posts
    9,021
    Since you mentioned the .32 H&R. A McDonalds straw and a Bic lighter can be used to make shot containers that should work.

    Robert

  12. #12
    Boolit Buddy

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mtns. of SW Virginia
    Posts
    220
    Quote Originally Posted by Mk42gunner View Post
    Since you mentioned the .32 H&R. A McDonalds straw and a Bic lighter can be used to make shot containers that should work.

    Robert
    Excellent idea, thanks!
    Running the ridges and riding the rivers of the Southwest Virginia Appalachians

  13. #13
    Boolit Bub


    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Booger County, Texas
    Posts
    38
    I use just #12, but no cups, in my sweetie's LadySmith and, at any distance at which a snake is going to bother me, they do VERY nicely. The case is closed at the mouth in a rather interesting manner:
    Calibre Weapon Bullet Mfg Sized
    .357 Mag Lady Smith Lee .360
    Primer Powder Wt/Type Alloy
    MgSmPs W 231 70 RB Black Powder
    Grains BC 0.08
    4.6
    Note
    Pwdr. Card (.05”), Grex (.3cc), card, shot (70gr), ball (crimp @ ctr)

  14. #14
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    113
    You don't need a computer to answer your question. Just a piece of paper, a ruler and a compass.

    Find out the diameter of the largest size and, using a compass, draw out that size packed together. (Of course for this purpose you need to draw everything to scale.) Then, the size of voids which will be the diameter of shot required to fill in the voids.

    The goal is to find out the size of shot that would allow #12 shot to fill in the spaces. I predict that it will be closer to #7 than #9 shot.


    Quote Originally Posted by Woodtroll View Post
    Just a curiosity question, as I expect someone has tried it already -

    Would there be any advantage to mixing small shot sizes (I'm thinking #9 and #12) to increase the load density and mid-range (6-15 feet or so) effectiveness of handgun shotshells on snakes and rats, and such? #12 to partially fill the voids between the #9 and increase the density, #9 for more mass and penetration? I'm thinking this would matter more in the smaller shells than the larger.

    Probably some computer genius could model this out and tell us what the most effective mix for any diameter shell would be based on a perfect matrix. Me, I'm thinking I'll pour some into a shot capsule so I can see what's going on, and weigh the different charges. But if someone's already tried this, I have other ideas that are equally trivial wastes of time. Haha!

    Thanks, everyone,
    Regan

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check