In a previous thread titled "What Group Buys are Open NOW?" some ideas and a couple of images were posted concerning the feasibility of a 38-55 6-cavity group buy.
After a little research and input from other forum members I added it all up, divided by Zip then multiplied by Squat and arrived at a few conclusions (mine only and subject to suggestion and change) that suggested another 38 caliber bullet dimension sketch.
Some of the conclusions:
1. We are working with three different chambers that could use the bullet in consideration:
A. The old, long, Ballard taper crimp chamber (my version is 2.140" long) which will chamber brass with a nominal length of 2.135" with no throat only a 15 degree leade angle to the bore.
B. The new short version (Clymer's Reamer specifications show 2.119" chamber length) again, only a 15-degree leade angle to the bore.
C. The 375 Winchester chambering which is (from memory only) 2.035" with a throat (I don’t know the length of it).
2. Next, we have three different lengths of brass that will or will not fit in the above chambers.
A. 2.130" 38-55 brass that will fit only in the older chamber.
B. 2.075” 38-55 brass that will fit in either the old or the newer chambers, but not in the 375 Winchester Chamber.
C. 2.020" 375 Winchester brass that will fit in all the chambers.
3. Various chamber neck, bore and groove dimensions should be able to be accommodated by sizing down from a dimension large enough to fit the largest bore diameter (0.382?????).
4. A one-size-fits-all would be a bullet design dropping from the mold at a diameter of 0.382 with 3 crimp grooves spaced 0.055" apart that would theoretically allow the bullet to engage the rifling or lead in nearly every Brass/Chamber configuration.
5. It was also brought to my attention that, typically, the most accurate bullets from the twists used in the various lever guns have been in the 150-grain range, so the design was shortened to reflect that weight.
6. And last, but not least, the choice of either gas check or plain base should be considered.
The following designs are the result of the conclusions.
When more opinions and ideas are expressed, we can do it again.
Respectfully submitted,
Tom Myers
Precision Ballistics & Records