RepackboxReloading EverythingTitan ReloadingWideners
Inline FabricationLoad DataLee PrecisionRotoMetals2
MidSouth Shooters Supply
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 500 S&W Load Data Help

  1. #1
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    34

    500 S&W Load Data Help

    Going to shoot the 500 magnum in the morning and was wondering if anyone had starting data available for the Matt’s Bullets I got today, I got some 390 grain spire points and some 385 grain long nose “John Ross design”, I plan on using H110/296. I know the long nose design is going to take more powder than any standard data, but I’m not sure how much. If anyone has start and max data I’d like to load a ladder for each bullet. Thanks for any help you guys can provide.

    The search function on this site doesn’t seem to be working for me? I’ve used it without issue before but now searching takes me to an advanced search page. The results from the advanced search are pretty much useless.

  2. #2
    Banner Sponsor

    lar45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,822
    What we will need is the bullet's length and the nose length or loaded length to plug into Quickload.

    Here are a couple of references that might help.
    http://www.lsstuff.com/misc/500loaddata-02.xls

    http://www.lsstuff.com/misc/j-ross500data.pdf

  3. #3
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    34
    Quote Originally Posted by lar45 View Post
    What we will need is the bullet's length and the nose length or loaded length to plug into Quickload.

    Here are a couple of references that might help.
    http://www.lsstuff.com/misc/500loaddata-02.xls

    http://www.lsstuff.com/misc/j-ross500data.pdf


    Thank you! I need to get quickload, it seems pretty useful.

    Long nose Bullet is

    .855 long

    .172 from base of bullet to top of crimp groove

    .132 from base of bullet to bottom of crimp groove

    Loaded length would be 2.298

    Spire point Bullet is

    1.050 long

    .526 from base of bullet to top of crimp groove

    .507 from base of bullet to bottom of crimp groove

    Loaded length would be 2.122

    This one is gas checked if it makes any difference.

  4. #4
    Banner Sponsor

    lar45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,822
    Okay, this is from Quickload, which is just a computer simulation, not pressure tested load data. So compare it to other load sources to see if it seems reasonable before you start.
    You didn't say which gun, so I assumed the 8.5" barrel.
    Hope this helps.

    385gn John Ross Long Nose bullet, .855", COAL 2.298"
    H110
    50gn 1873fps @ 52kpsi 93% load density
    52gn 1947fps @ 59kpsi 97% load density

    390gn Spire point, 1.050", COAL 2.122"
    H110
    36gn 1621fps @ 45kpsi 101% load density
    38gn 1720fps @ 55kpsi 107% load density

  5. #5
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    34
    Quote Originally Posted by lar45 View Post
    Okay, this is from Quickload, which is just a computer simulation, not pressure tested load data. So compare it to other load sources to see if it seems reasonable before you start.
    You didn't say which gun, so I assumed the 8.5" barrel.
    Hope this helps.

    385gn John Ross Long Nose bullet, .855", COAL 2.298"
    H110
    50gn 1873fps @ 52kpsi 93% load density
    52gn 1947fps @ 59kpsi 97% load density

    390gn Spire point, 1.050", COAL 2.122"
    H110
    36gn 1621fps @ 45kpsi 101% load density
    38gn 1720fps @ 55kpsi 107% load density

    Thanks for all your help, I have the 6 1/2 ported version, no need to rerun it though, would only change velocity right? Pressures should be pretty close? 50 grains of H110 under 385 grains of lead... it’ll definitely be the hottest load I’ve run so far. Would you recommend working up from 48 or 49? Or just start straight away at 50?

  6. #6
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    34
    Loaded up 5 test rounds of the long nose. I couldn’t find any load data anywhere for long nose bullets to compare to using H110. Overall length ended up coming in at 2.305 when seated to crimp groove. I settled on 49.8 for the test batch. Will report back tomorrow with results.

  7. #7
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    34
    Chronograph results from the 385 grain long nose Matt’s Bullets if anyone is interested

    S&W 6.5 inch ported barrel

    50.5 grains H110
    Shot 1: 1561
    Shot 2: 1656
    Shot 3: 1637
    3 shot average 1618

    51.2 H110
    Shot 1: 1638
    Shot 2: 1663
    Shot 3: 1631
    3 shot average 1644

    51.7 grains H110
    Shot 1: 1654
    Shot 2: 1650
    Shot 3: 1670
    3 shot average 1658

    52.1 grains H110
    Shot 1: 1638
    Shot 2: 1644
    Shot 3: 1614
    3 shot average 1632

  8. #8
    Banner Sponsor

    lar45's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,822
    Your 50.5gn load looks like it wasn't burning efficiently with the wide range of velocities.
    The 51.2 and 51.7gn loads look like it might be a place to spend some time to see what's the most accurate.

    For Quickload, once I get some chronograph data on a load, I go back to quickload and adjust the barrel length until it gives me the chonoed velocity. I write that number down and use it for future calculations as an effective barrel length and then it gets me really close with other bullets and powders.
    I am surprised that it was off by 300fps though.

    Did you have any problems with the bullets jumping the crimp? That isn't much of a shank to hold in the case...

  9. #9
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Jan 2021
    Posts
    34
    Quote Originally Posted by lar45 View Post
    Your 50.5gn load looks like it wasn't burning efficiently with the wide range of velocities.
    The 51.2 and 51.7gn loads look like it might be a place to spend some time to see what's the most accurate.

    For Quickload, once I get some chronograph data on a load, I go back to quickload and adjust the barrel length until it gives me the chonoed velocity. I write that number down and use it for future calculations as an effective barrel length and then it gets me really close with other bullets and powders.
    I am surprised that it was off by 300fps though.

    Did you have any problems with the bullets jumping the crimp? That isn't much of a shank to hold in the case...

    Yeah I’m thinking the porting is hurting my velocity some, I really wanted the 6.5 inch barrel, I just wish it wasn’t ported. Had I known the 5 inch John Ross performance center model existed, I would’ve definitely tried for one of those instead.

    No problems jumping crimp, I was only loading three at a time though, it could’ve gave me problems had I shot 4 and checked the fifth, but I did have about the most crimp I could give it. Also the weather was pretty bad, raining and overcast, conditions were 43°F and 30.07 for barometric pressure. I’m fairly inexperienced with chronographs and not quite sure how all that effects velocities.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check