WidenersMidSouth Shooters SupplyRotoMetals2Reloading Everything
Snyders JerkyRepackboxTitan ReloadingInline Fabrication
Load Data Lee Precision
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: What were they thinking back then........

  1. #21
    Boolit Master



    TNsailorman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Northeast Tennessee Hills
    Posts
    2,629
    I made my own 50 Hawken in the mid 70's using a set of blueprints that I bought from the Colorado Museum of an original Modina rifle. Of course it had a curved butt plate on it and wanting one as authenic as I could get, I put a curved butt plate on mine. mistake that I will never repeat. If you hold the rifle the way they did way back then, no problems. But I do not hold the butt on the inner ball of the shoulder socket in my other rifles. As a result when I shoot the Hawken in my normal style (I forget and hold it as normal) I get a very bruised shoulder or in the case of one day at a Black Powder Match, I came home with a big old bruise that had a small hole right in the center of it and a bloody undershirt from the blood that was oozing out of the little hole. Took a couple of weeks to heal up too. So I will never again have one of those type butts to kick mine. james

  2. #22
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Posts
    248
    I tried holding it against the upper arm as some had suggested but couldn't line up the sights without tilting my head to the side over the buttstock to compensate - very awkward. The 1899 hasn't been out for a while so taking it to the range tomorrow. Guess I'll just have to bite the bullet...or maybe not...have some cast RB with a light charge of 700X wimpy plinking loads.

  3. #23
    Moderator
    Texas by God's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    14,437
    I've never had a shotgun butt slip from my shoulder; so I'll pass on the rifle style, thanks.

    Sent from my SM-A716U using Tapatalk

  4. #24
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    385
    I have a 25/20 and 50/90 with this type of butt stock. The 25/20 is OK but the 50/90 is a killer, even when using one of those sissy pads. A shotgun buttstock is preferable and, for me, more comfortable and practical for quick follow up shots when hunting.

    They also make the toe of the stock quite vulnerable to damage. You see quite a few older rifles with a chip missing from the toe of the stock.

  5. #25
    Boolit Master

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ala.
    Posts
    1,205
    I guess I must be a sissy. Years ago, I stopped loading anything hot enough to make me bleed at the recoil of it. I actually like the curved butt plate. I quit shooting conicals out of my muzzle loader for this reason (reduce recoil).

  6. #26
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2,594
    Quote Originally Posted by TNsailorman View Post
    I made my own 50 Hawken in the mid 70's using a set of blueprints that I bought from the Colorado Museum of an original Modina rifle. Of course it had a curved butt plate on it and wanting one as authenic as I could get, I put a curved butt plate on mine. mistake that I will never repeat. If you hold the rifle the way they did way back then, no problems. But I do not hold the butt on the inner ball of the shoulder socket in my other rifles. As a result when I shoot the Hawken in my normal style (I forget and hold it as normal) I get a very bruised shoulder or in the case of one day at a Black Powder Match, I came home with a big old bruise that had a small hole right in the center of it and a bloody undershirt from the blood that was oozing out of the little hole. Took a couple of weeks to heal up too. So I will never again have one of those type butts to kick mine. james
    Bleeding at recoil!!!! Holy buckets!!!
    OUCH

    Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk

  7. #27
    Boolit Master .45Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    616
    The curved buttplates were made to be shot off the arm rather than the shoulder. You can see where by cupping your non-shooting hand into a "c" and putting it on your shooting arm just outside of your armpit - the perfect fit. Most were shot from here (actually works better than shoulder as you don't get caught up in clothes) and many people didn't rotate their thumb over the comb of the rifles either. Shoot a 1895 in 30-06 with curved buttplate, hurts if you do it wrong and is just fine if shot off arm.

  8. #28
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Posts
    35
    I've got a few rifles with crescent buttstocks. I know I tend to hold them more towards the arm, blading my body to the target more than with a flat buttstock, but I'm not actually sure whether I position the crescent on the outer shoulder or upper arm. I just go by comfort, so I'd have to check to see where I'm ending up. But none of mine are in hard kicking calibers, anyway. I can neither confirm nor deny, but Leverguns 50 on YT has some thoughts about why people think hard-hitting rifles with crescent buttstocks hurt more than they need to. I think he's got a good point about not holding the rifle in tight.

    Last edited by meh; 04-29-2021 at 06:14 PM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check