Inline FabricationLee PrecisionTitan ReloadingWideners
RotoMetals2Load DataReloading EverythingMidSouth Shooters Supply
Repackbox
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 43

Thread: Bullet lube gluing bullets in case necks

  1. #21
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    214
    Greenjoytj - thanks again.

    Do you have some personal experimental info on bullet tension?

    My Lyman M Die 30 for my .310" bullets has a .307" plug, and the 31 die for .312"/.3125" bullets has a .3095" plug. Short of sizing the larger bullets down, which in the past has enlarged groups, I have no room to move.

    I measured some pulled bullets and found NO CHANGE relative to unused bullets.

    Measurements are with micrometer, not vernier.

    I am starting to think that bullet adhesion is the "good" state, and that using ammo before it has had a chance to set up may be what I have to avoid.

    I am aware of crimping, and have crimped .32-20 and .44-40 cases, since these are thin and weak, but have been able to avoid doing .30-30. Crimping and excess belling are great destroyers of cases. My observation with .30-30 is that bullet adhesion, and bullets utilising only part of the neck, are providing a lot more resistance to collapse than crimping could. Besides, crimping requires trimming, which I also avoid in .30-30 apart from truing up any unevenness. There may even be some advantage in lengthened cases. My .30-30 chamber lengths are 2.121" and 2.153". Case stretch is going to kill the cases long before they get to this length.

    And thanks JohnBoy for response also. M dies are great tools. I have a bunch of them. My first run at headspacing .30-30 on the shoulder, to deal with excess headspace, involved running fired cases over .32, .33, .35 and .37 M dies, then sizing back to the dimensions I wanted. I've also used one in .22 when I was being a bit pedantic about accurate jacketed bullet loads for a M65 Bee.

    Incidentally, a spot of neck turning, 25% or 30% of circumference to take off the high spots, results in more even case stretch and case mouths when doing neck expansions.
    Last edited by Wilderness; 04-27-2021 at 03:48 AM.

  2. #22
    Moderator Emeritus


    JonB_in_Glencoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Land of 10,000 Lakes
    Posts
    15,832
    Boolit adhesion:
    I haven't seen any mention of your process for case cleaning? Afterall, that is what the lube is allegedly adhering to. Beeswax, or a lube with a large percentage of beeswax, sure could act like an adhesive when aged, maybe even as quickly as a few days. If the brass case is super cleaned by wet tumble and SS pins, then adhesion surely would be greater than cases that get a quick tumble in corncob media where you can see tarnish, carbon, or just age patina remaining inside the neck. I know that dark stuff sure makes sizing much easier, than when sizing super cleaned cases.

    If this is a real phenomenon, maybe try a soap lube, like SL69B. Judging by how that lube ages on sized/lubed boolits (that haven't been loaded), I can't imagine any "gluing" action happening with it. I surely haven't noticed any difference of difficulty in pulling boolits from freshly loaded ammo, to aged (a year or more) ammo...which I have done, just recently in fact.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    “If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun.”
    ― The Dalai Lama, Seattle Times, May 2001

  3. #23
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Canada, Ontario, Durham region
    Posts
    549
    You could fire an un-lube bullet.
    Not a bunch of them just 4, one aged cartridges and one new ctg. the both fire and pull a week or 2 later.
    Just to remove the your lube from the problem with the shifting POI and difficulty in pulling bullets.
    As far as a week or two of cartridge aging that short amount of aging time is insignificant against the working life span of a modern cartridge.

  4. #24
    Boolit Grand Master In Remembrance
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    6,314
    Wilderness, I can’t remember the last time I used my one & only Lyman M Die
    I shoot a lot of black powder calibers and from Track of the Wolf, have a box full of $4.99 compression/expander plugs used with the Lee die. For several calibers that I need an exact expansion for 0.001 to 0.002, I take a close dimension plug and shave the diameter.
    https://www.trackofthewolf.com/Categ...-EXPANDER-PLUG
    Last edited by John Boy; 04-27-2021 at 06:53 PM.
    Regards
    John

  5. #25
    Boolit Grand Master


    GregLaROCHE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Southern France by way of Interior Bush Alaska
    Posts
    5,286
    If you should decide to do some comparison testing, muzzle velocities would be interesting to know besides POI.

  6. #26
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    214
    Again, thanks to all for responding.

    I'm pretty much satisfied now that I have my solution, in an empirical sense at least - let the ammo sit for a week before I test or use it. The original issue related to unexplained zero failures for LAS Rams. I was shooting my test loads a day or so after loading, while the competition loads would sit around for up to a month. The answer is to let the test loads sit for a while also. Since pulling difficulty is similar between one week and much longer I suspect not much change after the first week. I am now seeing the initial non-adhesion as the issue.

    The immediate object is to get back to a Ram load that will group about 1" for 5 shots at 50 m and be on zero when I come to use it. I've been there before but have recently lost the plot.

    It may even be that BM2 powder, which I'm working on now, behaves differently to other powders when confronted with the adhesion issue/non-issue. Interestingly, BM2 listed data for 170 gn jacketed bullets is very close to realised velocities with 175 gn cast bullets (loads aged), whereas other powders give about 100 fps discrepancy (cast go faster for the same load).

    That said, it is always interesting to get to the bottom of something previously unexplained, and I'll be doing more digging.

    On specific points:

    JBIG - I'm not a case tumbler. I wipe down my .30-30 fired cases, lube them by rolling them between my hands with a very small amount of vaseline (my .308s require lanolin). Case necks are brushed out with some residual vaseline on the brush (from the hands). If the expander ball drags I apply more brushing. Then they get the M die. Residual lube would be scant. Never been an issue before.

    More heresy: Cases from my subsonic loads, which we are not discussing, but which also "set up" over time, apparently without affecting velocity or POI, are processed without any inside neck treatment - there is enough residual bullet lube there to do the business. These loads use 5 gns AP70/Universal with 115 gn .310", and 5.5 gns Unique with 163 gn .312".

    JJTJ - interesting idea re unlubed bullets at least at the level of seating, ageing or not, and pulling. As for firing them, given the differences in POI just of different lubes (can be quite a bit) I think the shooting part of the experiment would be difficult to interpret.

    JB - interesting. I need to look at the Lee system.

    Greg - this is an edit to include your post. As per the edited initial post, velocities for 26 gns BM2 and 175 gn cast bullets in .30-30 were 1898 fresh and 1942 aged, and about 2" POI difference at 50 meters.
    Last edited by Wilderness; 04-28-2021 at 09:37 PM.

  7. #27
    Boolit Grand Master


    Larry Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Lake Havasu City, Arizona
    Posts
    21,303
    I have run into pretty much the same phenomenon. I had loaded some commercial 45-70 cast bullets that had the commercial type hard wax lube and which I had TL'd in LLA. The W-W 45-70 cases had been cleaned as always in crushed walnut in a vibrator cleaner. The cases had been NS'd to the depth of the seated bullets. They were loaded for use in my H&R Officers Model TD over 4895 with a dacron filler. At the same time I loaded the commercial cast i also loaded some Lee 459-405-HB and some 458124s, both lubed with my BP lube.

    At the range [Ben Avery during a CBA match] I had a case separation. Nothing there at the range would get the front half of the case out so I was a DNF for that match. When back home i thought I'd double check the powder charge so I tried pulling the bullet using a inertia puller......it wouldn't budge. Both types of my own cast bullets with my BP lube pulled out just fine with the inertia puller. I then tried a collet puller in the press....still no go. I then removed the collet puller, raised the cartridge up through the die hole and used a pair of side cutters to bite into the bullet and pulling down on the cartridge expected the bullet to come out.....no go. I took a much solider bite into the bullet and literally cut the nose off the bullet trying to pull it.

    I then put a seating die in the press and seated the commercial cast bullets a small bit. Every one "cracked" as the seal was broke just US milsurp 7.62 will when seated a bit deeper to break the bullet sealant before shooting. After breaking the commercial cast loose by seating them a bit they pulled out as normal.

    Next i turned my attention to getting the stuck case out off the TD. I used a cerrosafe casting to do it. It took a bit of tapping on the rod to push the casting out. When out it was easy to see why none of the "field expedient" measures had worked to remove the stuck case. The front part of the case had literally been drug up 1/2" + into the bore and swaged into the rifling before the bullet broke loose from the case.

    Subsequently I shot the remainder of the commercial cast rounds after the "seal" had been broken by seating the bullet a bit. Nary a problem with them and good accuracy. None of the other rounds loaded at the same time with my own bullets lubed with my BP lube had to be seated deep as there was no "seal" as such. All shot quite well.

    Attachment 282076

    Attachment 282077

    I have no idea why as i have shot literally thousands of commercial cast bullets relubed with LLA in numerous cartridges over the years w/o any similar problems. I have no idea as to why the bullets were glued, sealed, stuck in, whatever this time in the 45-70.
    Larry Gibson

    “Deficient observation is merely a form of ignorance and responsible for the many morbid notions and foolish ideas prevailing.”
    ― Nikola Tesla

  8. #28
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    214
    Larry - many thanks for coming in on this issue. It's a relief that someone else has had an almost parallel experience to mine, and a warning that it could be something bigger than I experienced. I wonder if Alox is the common factor (my lube was BAC). It is tantalising however that the BM2/Benchmark load seems to benefit from adhesion.

    It is also interesting that you found out about the adhesion only when you tried to pull a bullet. How many others have experienced the same thing without realising it?

    I will feel my way forward with other lubes, testing for velocity and POI with ageing. This will include some newly purchased Orange Magic, which in the past has done well at this level.

    From an experimental standpoint, it seems that I have something repeatable, so it does not have to remain a complete mystery.

    The annoying thing is that this leaves a question over my old data and conclusions drawn from it - was the ammo old or new when fired?

    P.S. Many thanks also for your great posts on HV bullet lubes, LeverEvolution powder and the RPM story. I've had very good results with LVR and HP cast bullets in a Savage 99 with 12" twist at 2200 fps, but less so with the Marlin (1949) with 10" twist. Savage is for hunting, Marlin for LAS. Last year I cleaned up 165 (real) pigs with the hollow points. This year I will use up some Sierra 150s I was given. After that I will be using Sierra 170s and cast HPs loaded up to bring POI into line with the Sierras. All with LVR.
    Last edited by Wilderness; 04-28-2021 at 09:25 PM.

  9. #29
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    214
    For those who are interested, I have added an edit to the original message concerning testing for adhesion, comprising the following:

    Testing for adhesion by pulling bullets is complicated by collet slipping on cast bullets. A surer method seems to be applying pressure with seating die to test for "click" when bullet moves.

    Dummies loaded by me and tested 8 days later clicked for BAC and LBT lubes, but not for Orange Magic. A different set of three dummies tested at 12 days gave definitive clicks for BAC and LBT, and a lesser sound for OM.

    Alternative for home testing of a loading batch is to seat all bullets out a bit, then seat to full depth immediately before use to check for adhesion. A click will indicate adhesion at some level. I have no idea yet whether adhesion will set up again after once being broken - that is the next test.

    If someone actually tests their ammo I would be REALLY interested to hear how different lubes respond.
    Last edited by Wilderness; 04-29-2021 at 01:58 AM.
    It'll be handy if I never need it.

    Insomniac, agnostic, dyslectic - awake all night wondering if there is a Dog.

  10. #30
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    2,862
    If you really believe that this is a thing, and it sounds like you do and it may be, you need to figure out how to make bullets with a wire bail imbedded in them like a fishing sinker so you can hook up a strain gauge above your press and measure the force it takes to pull them.

    Best to cast them in, but drilling and screwing in an eyelet before sizing might also work.

    Then you can start testing variables. My guess is that it’s not the lube, but it’s an interesting puzzle.

    Oh, and number your brass, it’s a variable.

    Jim

  11. #31
    Boolit Grand Master In Remembrance
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    South Jersey
    Posts
    6,314
    Bullets loaded with 0.001 to 0.002 can be easily pulled out of the cases if there are no crimps. BPCR reloads with no crimps are the most accurate in single shot rifles. They are called ‘finger seated’ reloads and when the bullet is removed from the the cases with your fingers, you will hear a ‘pop’
    Regards
    John

  12. #32
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    214
    John Boy - no argument about low tension, but not when I want them to stay put in a tube magazine. I avoid crimping for reasons I have already advanced. Perhaps I should have used the expressions "crack" or "click" to describe the sound when the seal is broken. It occurs when the bullet has barely moved, long before the bullet exits the neck.

    JimB - nice idea to embed a wire bail in the bullet to circumvent the slipping bullet puller collet, and entirely doable with a hollow point mould, but is it necessary?

    Is the force required to break an adhesion by pulling any more or less than the force required to do it by pushing (seating deeper)? I suspect not, other than for the additional force required to expand a bit more neck with deeper seating. And which force is easier to measure, pushing or pulling? As applied to a reloading press and subjective "measuring" I would back pushing. I do not have seating dies that measure force required, and in any case they might go off the scale on a stuck bullet.

    With this in mind, I would propose the following methodology to check for bullet adhesion:

    1. Load a batch of ammo you intend to use (or dummies), but leave the bullets seated out at least .100".

    2. Immediately seat the required sample size another .010". Measure/assess the force required. This is for comparison with the steps that follow, or for netting off the measured force.

    3. One week later reseat another sample the required .010". Assess and record, and set aside.

    4. A week later do another group ..... etc

    5. Perhaps at step 4, take the .010" deeper group and give them another .010" - has adhesion reestablished? As for the rest of them, make it up as you go along to see when or if adhesion is reestablished. Is one "crack" enough to banish adhesion for good?

    6. Finish seating when you need to use the ammo.
    Last edited by Wilderness; 05-01-2021 at 02:03 AM.
    It'll be handy if I never need it.

    Insomniac, agnostic, dyslectic - awake all night wondering if there is a Dog.

  13. #33
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    214
    John Boy

    Here is another discussion among the jacketed bullet shooters of "sticky bullets".

    https://www.longrangeonly.com/forum/...k-bullet.1338/

    Of relevance to us is that it upsets ballistics.

    Test for adhesion of cast bullets, as per previous post, is under way.

    If anyone else is in a position to bump some seated bullets in a couple of thou, and test for the click as the adhesion breaks, or not as the case may be, please post. Relevant information is type of lube and how long ago the ammo was loaded.
    It'll be handy if I never need it.

    Insomniac, agnostic, dyslectic - awake all night wondering if there is a Dog.

  14. #34
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    2,862
    Brass thickness, composition, hardness and expansion as well as bullet hardness and size are all variables to be considered when pushing but are eliminated when pulling. Maybe easier to just put a strain gauge on the press handle, in which case I’d raise the cartridge, grab the bullet with side cutters and then raise the press handle by pulling on the strain gauge.

  15. #35
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    Jun 2021
    Location
    Rochester New York
    Posts
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Wilderness View Post
    I have recently been reminded of the occurrence of lubricated cast bullets setting up some sort of bond with the case neck after loaded cartridges have been standing for a time. The relevance of this is that it can affect velocity and POI, and probably group as well.

    The outcome can be a very different POI when you come to use the ammo versus what was obtained when testing immediately following loading. I have an instance to relate.

    With cast bullets, this adhesion may occur in as little as a week.

    I have found extensive discussion of such “welding” as it relates to jacketed bullets, but nothing at all on cast bullets. Welding/gluing, whether of jacketed or cast, can be discovered when attempting to pull bullets that don’t want to be pulled, or by attempting a small increase in seating depth. I occasionally pull cast bullets soon after loading them, for all the usual reasons, and do not recall any difficulty pulling newly loaded ammo. Seemingly it happens only with “aged” ammo.

    My reminder came from loading some .30-30s with 175 gn hard cast GC HP bullets and BAC lube.

    Powder was BM2 ("Benchmark" in U.S.). Rifle is a 1949 Marlin 336A. Bullets are seated out to engage the rifling, and not crimped. My Remington cases have a light outside neck turn – removing high spots and leaving neck thickness of .010” max to accommodate .3125” bullets with neck clearance. Case necks are expanded with Lyman M Die 31.

    With 24 gns of BM2, loaded the day before, I got 1830 fps for the clean barrel fouler, and 1782 average of 5 for the group, with SD 54. Next load was 26 gns, again loaded the day before - missed the velocity on the fouler, 1898 and 26 for the group. So far so good, about 50 fps per extra grain of powder, but still too much SD and vertical stringing (2” at 50 meters).

    I then loaded 27 gns, expecting 1950 fps, and hoping for the velocities to tighten up. Shooting was delayed by a spell of windy weather, so ammo aged about 10 days.

    When calmer conditions returned, the clean barrel fouler gave 2105 fps - up 200 fps for one grain, but extraction was fine. After some thought I then ran the group - average 2036 fps (138 fps extra for one grain, much too much), and SD 38.

    Groups were all about 1" lateral at 50 m, but 4", 2" and 4" vertically for the three loads when shot fresh, in line with SD. Updated plot of individual shot POIs against velocities (now 23 non-fouler shots) indicates 2.2" displacement per 100 fps velocity, emphasising the need to reduce velocity spread. Good loads in this rifle group about 1” at 50 m for 5 shots.

    I took the unfired 27 gn cartridges home and pulled them (collet). The first one tried WOULD NOT BUDGE. Then I bumped them in a few thou with the bullet seater. Each gave a distinct pop as the seal broke. After that they pulled normally. This looked like a message.

    Next, I shot some 26 gn BM2 loads that had been “aged” five days. This load previously, when shot fresh, averaged 1898 fps and gave a 2” five shot group at 50 meters. The same load now “aged”, and refusing to pull, gave 1993 fps (clean barrel fouler) and 1939 (average of the three following – I wasted two of the intended five).

    I repeated this part of the test later with 10 day old ammo with very similar results - clean barrel fouler 2035 fps, group 1943 fps. Combining the 8 non-fouler shots from the two tests gave 1942 fps and SD 18. POI comparing the eight aged rounds with the five fresh gave 4 minutes higher POI at 50 m, which would translate into about 5 minutes on the 200 m LAS rams. Groups at 50 meters for the two "aged" 26 gn tests were .59" (4) and 1.71" (5).

    Incidentally, for the four groups for which I had clean barrel fouler velocities, the average increase over the "group" velocity was 66 fps.

    I reread Larry Gibson’s report on his excellent lube test from 2014 (NOE site), but found no mention of when the shooting took place relative to when the cartridges were loaded.

    I have answered some of my own previous question (which lubes do it and what to do about it) - I have demonstrated adhesion for five different lubes, and resolved that henceforth I shall do both my testing and my serious shooting with ammo that is at least a week old.

    Edit April 29 and May 1 re testing:

    Testing for adhesion by pulling bullets is complicated by collet slipping on cast bullets. A surer method seems to be applying pressure with seating die to test for "click" when the bullet moves. By this test, BAC (Beeswax, Alox, Carnauba) remains a front runner loud and clear, and ammo loaded a few months ago with LBT is "clicking". Another aged lot with 3:1 beeswax and synthetic two-stroke oil seems to be OK.

    Dummies loaded by me and tested 8 days later clicked for BAC and LBT lubes, but not for Orange Magic. A different set of three dummies tested at 12 days gave definitive clicks for BAC and LBT, and a lesser sound for OM.

    Alternative for home testing of a loading batch is to seat all bullets out a bit, then seat to full depth immediately before use to check for adhesion. A click will indicate adhesion at some level. I have no idea yet whether adhesion will set up again after once being broken - that is for the future.

    If someone actually tests their ammo I would be REALLY interested to hear how different lubes respond.
    Just curious if any who has had this happen and popped the bullets loose by seating them deeper then let the rounds age to see if they got stuck again.

  16. #36
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    NE Kansas
    Posts
    2,421
    I suppose it depends a lot upon the type of bullet lube involved. I use the lithi-bee and if it is a problem, have never noticed it. Visualizing the sequence of events makes me even wonder if it really is a problem.

    The primer is ignited, the powder begins to burn and pressure builds up. The pressure expands the case against the walls as the bullet begins the travel down the barrel.

    If there is this "sticking factor" then why do we need a firm crimp on slow powders, why do many seat the bullet into the lands so more pressure is generated before the bullet begins moving. Perhaps I am just not all that engaged in the fine details and theory and just have a good time shooting.

    It has been suggested that seating a jacketed bullet that has sealant applied when produced will break that seal and can result in more uniform case neck tension. But that is not quite the same issue being discussed.

    The problem with testing for moving resistance due to sticking bullets by seating deeper is sort of skewed if you have any crimp on the bullet in the case.

  17. #37
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Apr 2021
    Posts
    214
    Quote Originally Posted by deaddeerwalking View Post
    Just curious if any who has had this happen and popped the bullets loose by seating them deeper then let the rounds age to see if they got stuck again.
    DDW - yes I did test this, and yes they did set up again. Conversely, examples which had not set up adhesion (i.e. did not click when seated the extra .010" or so) continued to be adhesion free with subsequent reseats. Scrubbing inside case necks with a lubricated brush prior to resizing reduces cast bullet neck adhesion.
    It'll be handy if I never need it.

    Insomniac, agnostic, dyslectic - awake all night wondering if there is a Dog.

  18. #38
    Boolit Master 243winxb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,837

    Increased bullet hold. Lube or Neck tension?

    Bullet pull can be over 100 pounds to move a bullet. In 30-06 or 45 acp. Jacketed or cast. Happens at around .005" or higher neck tension.

    Annealed brass should not get cracked necks that move with the bullet. Annealing doesnt help brittle brass that has been effected by a chemical. Ammonia or vinegar or ethanol/alcohol products.

    Range brass may come in contact with ammonia. Ammonia can occur in nature & produce cracked necks.

  19. #39
    Boolit Master


    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    3,783
    Lube = slippery making things slip

    Glue= sticky makes thing stick to each other.

  20. #40
    Boolit Grand Master

    gwpercle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana
    Posts
    9,251
    Quote Originally Posted by Geezer in NH View Post
    Lube = slippery making things slip

    Glue= sticky makes thing stick to each other.
    That was how I looked at it ... boolit lube just doesn't have adhesive factors ...
    ... in fact lube has the opposite factors it are slippery !
    But what do us old geezers know .
    Gary
    Certified Cajun
    Proud Member of The Basket of Deplorables
    " Let's Go Brandon !"

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check