Titan ReloadingLee PrecisionRotoMetals2MidSouth Shooters Supply
Snyders JerkyLoad DataInline FabricationWideners
Repackbox Reloading Everything
Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: hard to believe

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    499

    hard to believe

    I know this is cast boolit but, I feel that what the results of these two bullets needed to be shared. I would have never thought. In the target on the right was a 2 shot group with a .308 win. 180 gn sst propelled by 44.5gns of Varget. The target on the left was shot with .308 win (same rifle) 165 gn Hornady interlock flat base propelled by 45.5 gns of Varget. The targets were at 100 yards. I did not have my tape measure so i used a sheet of paper which is 8.5X11. The load data came from Hodgdons' web page and both are .5 under max charge. I would have never thought that I would have an 11 inch drop and why 8.5 + inches to the right. This reinforces always shoot a target to be certain how your ammo will preform.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	thumbnail.jpg 
Views:	138 
Size:	55.8 KB 
ID:	266563
    Last edited by redriverhunter; 08-21-2020 at 06:02 AM. Reason: add distance

  2. #2
    Moderator


    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Way up in the Cascades
    Posts
    8,162
    Hmmm...it is interesting. Kind of goes with the idea though that faster (165 gr./45.5 gr. Varget vs. (slower) 180 gr./44.5 gr. Varget is lower. No ready explanation for the group to the right, except that different charges do result in movement of groups to right or left. Could be that the barrel's rifling rate of twist is more suited to one bullet weight than the other. You're certainly right about verifying your loads on paper. That might be enough to miss a game animal or score a poorly placed hit.

  3. #3
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Moorhead, MN
    Posts
    688
    If you rested your rifle on sand bags (or worse a lead sled), it could have bounced from recoil that much. If you had your front hand between the sand bag and fore end, that's strange.

  4. #4
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    180
    Naw. There's something there that's actually rattling.

  5. #5
    Moderator
    Texas by God's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    14,412
    What rifle? Crackers has a point- check all the screws. That's a big difference, but the groups are good. Try a different scope if the present one won't pass the box test.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

  6. #6
    Boolit Bub
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by Norske View Post
    If you rested your rifle on sand bags (or worse a lead sled), it could have bounced from recoil that much. If you had your front hand between the sand bag and fore end, that's strange.
    What should I use as a better alternative for a rifle rest?

  7. #7
    Boolit Master Murphy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Idabel, Oklahoma
    Posts
    1,342
    I had a similar experience back in the 90's. The rifle, was a Springfield Armory M1A. I had shot military surplus loads, standard ball to sight it in. I shot it a few times and all was well. I decided to work up a hunting load for deer season, it was the only rifle I had at the time. I decided to give both 150 grain and 165 grain bullets a try. I wish I had kept records back then for it. I sand bagged the gun and touched off a shot. Whoa! That can't be right. The next four rounds proved me wrong. I never looked for the cause of what caused such a vastly different point of impact. I did however, find an excellent 165 Grain load and do have the data for it.

    Change any part of the equation of a handload, and you can expect some change. I'd just never seen one so drastic. That being said, without fail, I target a gun before carrying it afield.

    Murphy
    If I should depart this life while defending those who cannot defend themselves, then I have died the most honorable of deaths. Marc R. Murphy '2006'.

  8. #8
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    2,377
    Have a Sako 75 hunter in 30-06. Handload chronographs 2800 fps. 165 Nosler ballistic tip, Fed case, 55.5 grs IMR 4350 CCI magnum primer. Rifle is sighted in for that load. Lake City 63 match 173 grain bullet @ 2640 fps. Shoots within 1" of my handload. Go figure!. Frank

  9. #9
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Moorhead, MN
    Posts
    688
    The best rifle rest I've found (if matching what the rifle will do when handheld is important) is a rolled up sleeping bag. The fore end sinks, so not much side-to-side movement, and zero recoil bounce. Remember, even with those heavy WW1 bolt action rifles, the gun had moved 1/2" before the bullet left the muzzle.
    Your experience is very similar to what one of my 30-06 rifles did when I compared 180 Hornady round nose bullets to their 178 gr ELD hunting bullets.

  10. #10
    Boolit Master Win94ae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    585
    Yes there can be all sorts of things that explain the POI oddity, sand bags isn't one.

  11. #11
    Boolit Grand Master tazman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    west central Illinois
    Posts
    7,703
    I have tested loads in several rifles and had the impact point move a large distance away from point of aim simply by changing the bullet weight.
    I had a 243 that grouped very well at 100 with 90 grain bullets and tried a 55 grain bullet. That one printed 8 inches straight left at 100 yards. Beautiful group though.
    Other rifles have done similar things. The oddest rifle I have shoots every bullet weight I have tried into the same 1.5 inch group at 100 yards.
    'The only time I need to change the scope is to adjust for distance. I am keeping this one for hunting.

  12. #12
    Moderator
    Texas by God's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    14,412
    In my experience, it's a rare rifle that shoots all bullet weights together- but Tazman has one and so does my wife. Her .250 Savage bolt action will shoot 75 to 120 grain bullets into a 2" group. I've done it a few times.
    She insists that I leave it alone with some 87 gr Speer bullets at 3000 fps handy.
    My 22-250 freaks out on a 20gr difference in bullets and 600 fps in velocity.......

    Sent from my SM-A716U using Tapatalk

  13. #13
    Boolit Grand Master
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    5,298
    Not knowing many of the particulars, I'd hazard a guess that the two different bullet weights have induced different barrel harmonics and the result is a different POI.

  14. #14
    Boolit Master



    atr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Vashon Island WA
    Posts
    2,293
    I've had some pretty radical changes to point of impact also so I am not surprised at your results
    Death to every foe and traitor and hurrah, my boys, for freedom !

  15. #15
    Boolit Grand Master



    M-Tecs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    9,533
    Quote Originally Posted by 725 View Post
    Not knowing many of the particulars, I'd hazard a guess that the two different bullet weights have induced different barrel harmonics and the result is a different POI.
    That would be my guess also. Changes in POI with different loads and or bullet weights have been the norm for me. I have personally not experienced any that much but I have had as much as 6" POI change at a 100 with as simple ammunition brand change when shooting factory 30/06 of the same weight. I also have some guns that are effected very little by this. Until you test you never know.
    2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. - "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    "Before you argue with someone, ask yourself, is that person even mentally mature enough to grasp the concept of different perspectives? Because if not, there’s absolutely no point."
    – Amber Veal

    "The Highest form of ignorance is when your reject something you don't know anything about".
    - Wayne Dyer

  16. #16
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    166
    Barrel harmonics variation would be my guess. Groups are suitable for hunting regardless.

  17. #17
    Boolit Master


    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    3,783
    Count two shot group? No repeat it 20 times maybe

  18. #18
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,167
    I have seen it change from lot to lot with ammunition too. The competition guys get all they can from one lot of ammo made as the point of impact can change from different lots of ammo made. You can have the same problem when you buy one box of ammo one year and then a year later buy another box just like the last, but the point of impact can be different. The factory can change propellant or brass cases or bullets or primers even. it is enough to affect the performance.

  19. #19
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    barry s wales uk
    Posts
    2,655
    im more consistent if i hold the fore end of my rifles with my hand on the bag/rest. especially leverguns .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check