RotoMetals2Lee PrecisionTitan ReloadingSnyders Jerky
Load DataMidSouth Shooters SupplyInline FabricationRepackbox
Wideners Reloading Everything
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Marlin 1894 in 44 and hbwc

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy mag44uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Reading,UK
    Posts
    364

    Marlin 1894 in 44 and hbwc

    On a whim I got a MP moulds brass hbwc mould - a thing of beauty!
    Here in the UK Marlins are used for paper punching out to 50 yards.
    We have no need for loads for felling critters.
    I use 200 and 240 gn boolits out of saeco moulds @ around 950 fps.

    I tried some of the hbwc and it brought merit to the expression " couldn't hit a cows **** with a banjo!"
    A mate tried some in his marlin and they were spectacularly awful as well.

    Shooting these as cast @ approx. 0.432
    They shoot fine out of a pistol.

    Is this to do with the 1 in 38 twist or lack of velocity or bearing length?

    I have a 41mag marlin with 1 in 20 twist I am toying with trying with hbwc when MP mould gb comes up.

    Tony

  2. #2
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Castlegar, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    7,949
    Sounds as though boolits are fat enough at 0.432" as most Marlins run 0.431"+ groove diameter.

    Could be low velocity maybe not enough to stabilize with the 1:38" twist. Try some speedier loads to see if that helps.

    Have you recovered any boolits? Could the skirt be blowing?

    Are you using soft alloy or WW?

    I've shot some pretty large meplat boolits from my Marlin but never a full wadcutter and not at such low velocity. Not soft either. Most of my casting is with range scrap or WW.

    I actually wanted the same mould but my Marlin would even feed SWC's so there is no way it would feed full wadcutter except single loading. Does yours feed them from the magazine?

    Another though though unlikely I think... if you are seating all the way in the brass and full length resizing brass the skirt may be swaging down so is undersize for the bore. I had this happening when reloading for my Lee Enfields. Factory dies size the necks to an optimistic 0.310" or close for 0.312" bullets but I was loading 0.315" boolits. After pulling a few and measuring I found the lead boolits were being resized smaller by the tight necks. So, I made a larger expander button which solved that issue but of course still worked the brass a lot so then got a Lee collet sizer and set it up to size 0.313". Problem solved.

    In your case if you are full length sizing .44 brass it will be small for Marlin chamber and with the taper in the brass you may be squeezing the skirt as it goes deep so making it undersize. I only "neck size" my .44 brass these days but when I seat boolits they really bulge the brass. One day I'll get a different sizing die I can hone out. I am using a Lee carbide die and it sizes way too small for my 1894 chamber.

    Just a couple of thoughts.

    Longbow

  3. #3
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    913
    hbwc's confuse me on how they can not be stable, ive seen it in handguns. the front end weighs more than the back end so idk why they would not be stable. id catch one and see if you can gather any info from it.

  4. #4
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Castlegar, B.C., Canada
    Posts
    7,949
    From what I understand turbulence from the shockwave is the issue. They are accurate over short distances then lose stability.

    From someone with much more knowledge than me:

    http://www.lasc.us/Fryxell_Book_Chap..._Wadcutter.htm

    The sentence of interest here: "The wadcutter also generally has extensive bearing surface that provides better alignment in the throat and forcing cone of a revolver, thereby favoring concentric engraving, and better short range accuracy (before the lousy aerodynamics of the "flying trash can" destabilize the bullet and ruin flight stability)."

    He also comments on HBWC's.

    Not sure if they are any more accurate than other bullet designs but their popularity apparently comes from punching nice clean holes through targets for easier scoring more than anything.

    I'm not much of a handgun guy so not much personal experience here but the above is what I have always been told.

    Longbow

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check