Inline FabricationRepackboxLoad DataRotoMetals2
WidenersTitan ReloadingMidSouth Shooters SupplyReloading Everything
Snyders Jerky Lee Precision
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Ruger #1 416 Remington Mag

  1. #1
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    nebraska
    Posts
    17

    Ruger #1 416 Remington Mag

    Well the #1 I have coming is a 416 rem mag. Does anybody have experience with paper patch in this gun? I'm looking at a mold from accuratemolds. #41-420CG What do you think of this design? I think I'd like to patch an as cast boolit but it seems that most people size first. Why is that? What diameter would you recommend? I read that bore diameter should be .408 so I was thinking .410 Thanks for the help.
    Roy

  2. #2
    In Remembrance


    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Michigan Thumb Area
    Posts
    5,948
    Have you done much patching up till now? I would advise against getting the #41-420CG mold, but would say the #41-420C a better choice as it is a flat base mold. The #41-400 P is already a PP mold, although it lacks gripping grooves that Tom can add if ordered. When wrapping a patch it is advisable to have a flat base rather than a GC rebated base. I know people use GC molds and like to patch them, I`m only giving my .02 cents on it. My custom PP .416 flat base mold by Richard Doughty casts at .411" Dia. with 3 gripping bands .100" wide on the body to better grip the patch. The finished weight of boolet, patch and a wipe of JPW comes in at about 395 Gr. +/- using my 50/50 alloy. I final size the patched boolet in a custom made .417" sizer. Out of my .416 Taylor I get very respectable accuracy at 100 yds., haven`t shot it farther out yet. Send an E-Mail to Tom at Accurate and ask about modifying a mold design for your purposes.Robert

  3. #3
    Boolit Grand Master Nobade's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    SE WV
    Posts
    6,271
    I designed the 41-390P for my .416 Taylor. It looks like it does because the reamer I used has a very long throat and I built the rifle on a Winchester M70, which has a short magazine. That bullet seats to the base of the neck, touches the rifling, and feeds through the magazine. Your #1 won't have any such limitations to it, so once you get the rifle in your hands you can make a chamber cast and see what exactly you will want for a bullet. It will be about .409" - .410" in diameter, parallel sided from the base of the case neck to the leade, have whatever nose on it you feel appropriate, and small gripper grooves for the patch to grab.

    You will find that the Rigby works exceptionally with paper patch ammo, allowing full power with good accuracy and no leading using soft lead bullets. It is also big enough to allow good use of slow 50BMG gunpowder if you desire something less than full ballistics. Enjoy!

    -Nobade

  4. #4
    Boolit Mold
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    nebraska
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by Hardcast416taylor View Post
    Have you done much patching up till now? I would advise against getting the #41-420CG mold, but would say the #41-420C a better choice as it is a flat base mold. The #41-400 P is already a PP mold, although it lacks gripping grooves that Tom can add if ordered. When wrapping a patch it is advisable to have a flat base rather than a GC rebated base. I know people use GC molds and like to patch them, I`m only giving my .02 cents on it. My custom PP .416 flat base mold by Richard Doughty casts at .411" Dia. with 3 gripping bands .100" wide on the body to better grip the patch. The finished weight of boolet, patch and a wipe of JPW comes in at about 395 Gr. +/- using my 50/50 alloy. I final size the patched boolet in a custom made .417" sizer. Out of my .416 Taylor I get very respectable accuracy at 100 yds., haven`t shot it farther out yet. Send an E-Mail to Tom at Accurate and ask about modifying a mold design for your purposes.Robert
    I have rolled a few but not a lot. .308 worked good .338 win not so good. Why do you prefer the flat base? I have read that it is easier to twist the tails without tearing them on a gascheck design.

  5. #5
    Boolit Master MarkP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Omaha NE
    Posts
    1,249
    Roylowell the bore will be 0.408 but the groove will be around 0.416". Accurate 42-310B & 42-400B are my designs for my wildcat based on a 300 WSM case I do not paper patch so no help there.

  6. #6
    In Remembrance


    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Michigan Thumb Area
    Posts
    5,948
    Quote Originally Posted by roylowell View Post
    I have rolled a few but not a lot. .308 worked good .338 win not so good. Why do you prefer the flat base? I have read that it is easier to twist the tails without tearing them on a gascheck design.

    As I said that some people patch a GC boolet and get decent accuracy, I don`t fall in with that crowd. I have tried doing that way, didn`t like the way the tail came out or for that matter how they shot. A flat base give a better gas seal immediately on firing than a GC wrapped boolet does and I believe better accuracy. Perhaps you aren`t leaving enough over hang of patch on the flat base and can`t make a decent tail "twist", or your patch is too damp and tears when doing a tail.

    I designed the Accurate #32-200P mold with Tom for my 8mm Mauser, it really made a difference in my Mausers. I wrap .30 cals up thru the 7.62 Mosin Nagant round. I patch .338-06 and .338 Mag. with good results. The .375 H&H is the next to largest I patch. For the .416 cal. I have experimented patching "Fat .40 cal." boolets with decent results. The .416`s I patch for are the .416 Taylor on a Model 70 action and a .416 Russian Express which is a MN case necked up to .416 on a Nagant action.Robert

  7. #7
    Boolit Buddy Haggway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    South East Texas
    Posts
    279
    Do a chamber cast. The throat on both my #1 .416 rifles are tight.

  8. #8
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    132

    PP gas check bullets...without the GC...

    Quote Originally Posted by Hardcast416taylor View Post
    As I said that some people patch a GC boolet and get decent accuracy, I don`t fall in with that crowd. I have tried doing that way, didn`t like the way the tail came out or for that matter how they shot. A flat base give a better gas seal immediately on firing than a GC wrapped boolet does and I believe better accuracy. Perhaps you aren`t leaving enough over hang of patch on the flat base and can`t make a decent tail "twist", or your patch is too damp and tears when doing a tail.


    I designed the Accurate #32-200P mold with Tom for my 8mm Mauser, it really made a difference in my Mausers. I wrap .30 cals up thru the 7.62 Mosin Nagant round. I patch .338-06 and .338 Mag. with good results. The .375 H&H is the next to largest I patch. For the .416 cal. I have experimented patching "Fat .40 cal." boolets with decent results. The .416`s I patch for are the .416 Taylor on a Model 70 action and a .416 Russian Express which is a MN case necked up to .416 on a Nagant action.Robert
    That makes sense! Never thought about the space where the GC usually goes giving the flame/powder granules a chance to destroy the paper tail before the bullet can 'upset' in the bore.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check