Load DataLee PrecisionTitan ReloadingRepackbox
WidenersMidSouth Shooters SupplyInline FabricationReloading Everything
RotoMetals2
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: 22 Hornet Black Powder

  1. #1
    Boolit Buddy davidheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    US
    Posts
    486

    22 Hornet Black Powder

    I know some of you may balk at me, so please forgive my ignorance. I usually don't venture into the black powder section.

    However, I read the 22Hornet was originally developed as a black powder cartridge in the 1920s from a couple sources... I don't have a mold for .22 caliber yet, but I'm super curious to try this.

    Does the above data sound right? Any conciderations I should use? Anybody do this before?

  2. #2
    Banned bigted's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Sweet Home Oregon
    Posts
    4,456
    I will be disappointed if any "balking" happens here with the BP and Hornet post. I would guess that instead there will be a couple comments on the "WHAT TOOK SO LONG GETTING HERE" thing.

  3. #3
    Boolit Man 40-82's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    southwest Virginia
    Posts
    91
    My understanding is that the 22 Hornet was developed from the old 22 WCF, which did start as a black powder cartridge. As far as I know there is no reason you couldn't use black powder in the 22 Hornet, but if you did what you would have would duplicate 22 WCF ballistics and not 22 Hornet ballistics.
    NRA Life Member

  4. #4
    Moderator / Master Tool & Die Maker


    Red River Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
    Posts
    2,130
    Problem with the small bore BP rounds is fouling control. That may be your biggest problem should you decide to venture that route.

    RRR
    "I Make the part.............................that makes the parts"

    Looking for Bullet Mould Handles, Heavy Duty Replacement Sprue Plates, Adjustable Paper Patch Bullet Moulds? Check here:http://www.kal.castpics.net/

    My Feedback!

    http://castboolits.gunloads.com/show...Red-River-Rick

  5. #5
    Boolit Master



    Springfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    San Jose, California
    Posts
    3,684
    Smaller bores seem to foul easier than larger. I can keep my 44 and 45's running all day, even a 45 Government auto in 45 acp, but the .32's seem to foul out much faster. Never tried a .22, but I have a Hornet Handi-rifle, might give that a go just for fun. I would use fffg, not ffg, tends to burn cleaner.

  6. #6
    In Remembrance w30wcf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Erie, PA
    Posts
    1,604
    Several years ago I spent the better part of the summer working with b.p. in the hornet to replicate the vintage .22 W.C.F. Cartridge. First I tried Goex and fouling.reared it's ugly head in short order. Switching to Swiss resolved the fouling problem.

    I used the Lyman 225438 and the NEI 45 rnfp bullets lubed with SPG. Both worked equally well.

    Definitely use small pistol primers. Small rifle primers produced the worst groups and velocity variances of over 200 f.p.s.

    Minimal compression worked the best.

    Best groups @ 50 yards averaged around 1 1/2" which were double the size of my smokeless .22 W.C.F. Load of 3.3 / 231.

    Rifle used was a '43 Winchester with a 2x-7x variable scope.

    w30wcf
    aka w44wcf
    aka Jack Christian SASS 11993 "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." Philippians 4:13
    aka John Kort
    NRA Life Member
    .22 W.C.F., .30 W.C.F., .44 W.C.F. Cartridge Historian

  7. #7
    Boolit Grand Master

    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Northwest Ohio
    Posts
    14,457
    Sounds like a very interesting project. The right lube to control fouling, the right alloy to promote accuracy and slow leading. As stated above 3 f may be a better choice for this to reduce fouling and possibly a little more velocity.

  8. #8
    Boolit Grand Master uscra112's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Switzerland of Ohio
    Posts
    6,314
    The old timers, going back into the 1890s, used 2 to 4 grains of "nitro" powder under their black to control fouling.

    The .22 WCF (.22-13-45) was an 1880s development, 13 grains black and a 45 grain paper patched boolit that was .228 diameter. There were smaller .22 caliber centerfires, and there was one try in 1894/95 at a .22-20, but that one used 4 grains nitro under 16 grains black to make it work.

    So it would be nicely in period to try a duplex load. 2 or 3 grains of Unique would be my pick, and use Swiss 1 1/2 powder, which doesn't foul like Goex. (But then nothing fouls like Goex.)
    Cognitive Dissident

  9. #9
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,200
    I have a No. 3 Ballard in .25-25 Stevens. I am using Swiss 3FG with a 100gr. Ideal #25020 20-1 lead-tin alloy. I tried du-plexing..first with 4759..2-3grs. didn't really clean up much. Then I tried PB,
    1-2grs. left bore looking as if a straight smokeless load had been fired. However..with straight Swiss, I could blow-tube and groups were around 1" at 50yds. running 1 barely damp patch thru after each shot gave match accuracy..3/8". With the du-plex..I still needed that 1 patch thru..but could use dry patch. I fiqured it wasn't worth hassel & went back to straight black.

  10. #10
    Boolit Grand Master uscra112's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Switzerland of Ohio
    Posts
    6,314
    Quote Originally Posted by .22-10-45 View Post
    I have a No. 3 Ballard in .25-25 Stevens. I am using Swiss 3FG with a 100gr. Ideal #25020 20-1 lead-tin alloy. I tried du-plexing..first with 4759..2-3grs. didn't really clean up much. Then I tried PB,
    1-2grs. left bore looking as if a straight smokeless load had been fired. However..with straight Swiss, I could blow-tube and groups were around 1" at 50yds. running 1 barely damp patch thru after each shot gave match accuracy..3/8". With the du-plex..I still needed that 1 patch thru..but could use dry patch. I fiqured it wasn't worth hassel & went back to straight black.
    Good info. Thanks !
    Cognitive Dissident

  11. #11
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    3,113
    I have a Ballard that I converted from 32 Long to 22 WCF. I know, it was a big mistake but I could not find 32 Long ammunition either CF or RF. The work was done by V M Starr and he used a 22 LR liner so .223 diameter. I tried 3F Goex, and some 2F but way back then I did not know of lubes specific to gunpowder and used whatever I had for the 38 Special or 44 Magnum. Results were...not good. I intend to give it another attempt with old Eynesforth, 3F or maybe 4F and a BP lube. Maybe that will produce better results.

    If not, I will develop a smokeless load.
    Knowledge I take to my grave is wasted.

    I prefer to use cartridges born before I was.

    Success doesn't make me happy, being happy is what allows me to be successful.

  12. #12
    Boolit Buddy davidheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    US
    Posts
    486

  13. #13
    Moderator Emeritus / Trusted loob groove dealer

    waksupi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Somers, Montana, a quaint little drinking village,with a severe hunting and fishing problem.
    Posts
    19,340
    With a .22 Hornet, I would be sorely tempted to venture into 4ffff BP and dacron filler. The 4f would take care of much of the fouling problem, and the dacron would allow you to work up to where case capacity is giving the desired velocities.
    The solid soft lead bullet is undoubtably the best and most satisfactory expanding bullet that has ever been designed. It invariably mushrooms perfectly, and never breaks up. With the metal base that is essential for velocities of 2000 f.s. and upwards to protect the naked base, these metal-based soft lead bullets are splendid.
    John Taylor - "African Rifles and Cartridges"

    Forget everything you know about loading jacketed bullets. This is a whole new ball game!


  14. #14
    Boolit Master Randy C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    North Dakota
    Posts
    740
    I use GOEX it is dirty so I run 1 or 2 patches through every shot with Napa milling / grinding oil its blue and dilute it 20 to 1

  15. #15
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    3,113
    Quote Originally Posted by waksupi View Post
    With a .22 Hornet, I would be sorely tempted to venture into 4ffff BP and dacron filler. The 4f would take care of much of the fouling problem, and the dacron would allow you to work up to where case capacity is giving the desired velocities.
    That's about what I was thinking. I can get GOEX 4F locally but the OE I will need to order. I will check with the Kindig's before I place an order, they might be able to include it when they order some.

    That and a BP specific lube should help contain the fouling. The stuff I used was whatever was in the lubrisizer. Practically needed to wipe the bore as the boolit was going through it. With jacketed bullet, not as much trouble when loaded over BP. Not nearly as much fun either.
    Knowledge I take to my grave is wasted.

    I prefer to use cartridges born before I was.

    Success doesn't make me happy, being happy is what allows me to be successful.

  16. #16
    Boolit Buddy
    jrmartin1964's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    MS
    Posts
    449
    In the 1890s there actually was a blackpowder cartridge known as ".22 Hornet" or ".22 Harwood Hornet" (after it's creator, Reuben Harwood, a.k.a. "Iron Ramrod"). Developed in 1894, and based on the .25-20 Single Shot cartridge necked down to .22 caliber (0.228), and originally loaded with a 63-grain lead bullet over 20 grains of powder. Twist was 1:12. Ideal Handbooks No.5 (c.1894) through No.15 (c.1903) recommended a 55-grain bullet (No.22834 or No.22835) and 20 grains of black, and loading tools are known marked "22-20" and "22-20 Hornet".

    Mr. Harwood reportedly attained velocities of 2000 fps with a 45-grain bullet. Apparently, sometime after 1897 Harwood abandoned this cartridge in search of higher velocities, basing his new experiments on the .32 Ideal.

    Jim

  17. #17
    Boolit Buddy davidheart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    US
    Posts
    486
    I'm happy.

    Thank you all for the information.

  18. #18
    Boolit Grand Master uscra112's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Switzerland of Ohio
    Posts
    6,314
    Info on the Ideal handbook is helpful, thanks. I actually have a Harwood Hornet. Been gathering info on it for a couple of months now. Harwood worked up the cartridge a little earlier, but made a public introduction in 1894 along with the Stevens New Ideal, in a Shooting and Fishing article. It never took off. Ned Roberts says that less than 50 rifles were ever chambered for it. Modern Hornet on the left, Harwood Hornet on the right. They really share nothing but the name.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Two Hornet Cases.jpg 
Views:	212 
Size:	26.8 KB 
ID:	102601
    Cognitive Dissident

  19. #19
    Boolit Master
    Texantothecore's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Jersey Village, Tx
    Posts
    1,382
    Quote Originally Posted by waksupi View Post
    With a .22 Hornet, I would be sorely tempted to venture into 4ffff BP and dacron filler. The 4f would take care of much of the fouling problem, and the dacron would allow you to work up to where case capacity is giving the desired velocities.

    I would be very interested in your experiments with the Hornet and 4fg. Our European members might be able to provide some insight as from what I hear the use of 4fg as the main propellant in Europe is much more common than in the US.

    Please keep us updated.

  20. #20
    Boolit Buddy
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    loppstaa country
    Posts
    223
    I just got an H+R Hornet, and I'm waiting on a reloading die set,
    a kind gentleman here sent me 40 37g NOE mold boolits to try out,
    I've been sighting in using 35-Hornady Vmax bullets for the cases,
    I don't know what they use for a charge,
    sighted it in at 40 yards (all i have in front of a berm)at home,
    then tapped out a primer with a drill bitt, and seated in a SP primer with a bigger drill bitt (ya i know I'm waiting for my gear to show up i ordered)
    loaded up the case with 12.7g of 3F swiss, hand pressed the bullet in to the lube band after beveling the inside of the case,
    loaded it and it landed 1/4 inch below the V-Max bullets no clue to FPS but it is a nice muffled low bang compared to that darn crack

    no crimping--same style i use when i shoot my 45-70 trapdoor
    not much residue, no more than my trapdoor,, a swab and its gone ready to load up again,

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check