RotoMetals2Load DataMidSouth Shooters SupplyTitan Reloading
Lee PrecisionInline FabricationWidenersRepackbox
Reloading Everything Snyders Jerky
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Ratio of body to nose and nose size..

  1. #1
    Boolit Grand Master Char-Gar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Deep South Texas
    Posts
    12,820

    Ratio of body to nose and nose size..

    I enjoy the 30-30 round very much and my current playtoy is a 1960 Marlin Texan carbine. With a good 170-180 GC bullet over 17/4759 it will give 2.5 MOA accuracy, plus or minus a tad depending on the bullet.

    This Marlin has a land diameter of .305...Pretty large even for a Marlin. Yesterday I was shooting the above load over two 170 grain CG bullets and the results were just the same in terms of accuracy.

    The first was a custom Mountain Mold with a nose that casts at .307.
    The second is SAECO 305 with a nose of .303. Both bullets were sized .311 which is as large as the Marlin throat will accomidate.

    One mold .002 over land and the other .002 under land. Both of these bullets are of the traditional 30-30 design with about a 58% body and a 42% nose.

    I am left with one of two conslusions.

    2) The smaller nose is slugging up to fill the bore
    3) .002 nose undersize on a bullet that is 58% body does not affect accuracy.

    I know accuracy would suffer with a .002 undersize nose on one of those long nose bore riders, but it doesn't seem to matter much on these "mostly body" bullets.

    Any comments, corrections or experiences to share on the subject at hand?

  2. #2
    Boolit Master on Heavens Range
    felix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    fort smith ar
    Posts
    9,678
    Charger, if your alignment is good and ignition is consistent, then the bore riding size of the boolit should not make that much difference, if any. Naturally, we are talking about a reasonable bearing length without regard for the nose being an extension. ... felix
    felix

  3. #3
    Boolit Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    US, Wash, PA
    Posts
    4,934
    Quote Originally Posted by Chargar
    I am left with one of two conslusions.

    2) The smaller nose is slugging up to fill the bore
    3) .002 nose undersize on a bullet that is 58% body does not affect accuracy.

    Any comments, corrections or experiences to share on the subject at hand?

    Chargar,

    Two points are listed as 1.) and 2.)

    Unsupported nose weight is unsuported nose weight. How much a bullet design can carry is limited by the bearing area of the caliber you are shooting and the maximum velocity potential of a weak bullet design.

    It matters not if it is shaphed like a nose on a semi wadcutter, a spire point, or a bore rider that doesn't touch, for a rifle. Which by the way, a bore rider is nothing more than a semi wadcutter bullet for a rifle. It only needs to be elongated for weight. Let the nose touch the lands or add a DD band and you strengthen the design and improve the top velocity potential of the bullet.

    What's the magic formula for bearing length to unsupported nose weight you ask? At what twist rate?

  4. #4
    Boolit Master Doughty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Missoula, Montana
    Posts
    599
    Also for consideration is the "hardness" of the bullet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Abbreviations used in Reloading

BP Bronze Point IMR Improved Military Rifle PTD Pointed
BR Bench Rest M Magnum RN Round Nose
BT Boat Tail PL Power-Lokt SP Soft Point
C Compressed Charge PR Primer SPCL Soft Point "Core-Lokt"
HP Hollow Point PSPCL Pointed Soft Point "Core Lokt" C.O.L. Cartridge Overall Length
PSP Pointed Soft Point Spz Spitzer Point SBT Spitzer Boat Tail
LRN Lead Round Nose LWC Lead Wad Cutter LSWC Lead Semi Wad Cutter
GC Gas Check