Originally Posted by
Bent Ramrod
I will also assume you meant groove diameter 0.458” and that you want bore rather than groove diameter boolits for your paper patching experiments.
I just tried a boolit from a Brooks 0.441+” diameter mould that I lapped out to 0.443”, patched dry with two wraps of Strathmore Tracing paper at 0.0015” thickness, in my Pedersoli Long Range Sharps that they made for Cabela’s a while back. Before I got it, it had the barrel shortened a couple inches, and the chamber lengthened to .45-2.6”.
The patched boolit neither fitted into the muzzle nor did it push into the rifling from the breech end with a cleaning rod. They’ll push through the barrels of my two .45-70 Shiloh Sharps rifles with a slight amount of drag, leaving rifling marks on the patch’s outer wrap.
So, on the basis of the minuscule data set of one Pedersoli rifle and two Shilohs, I would say that the bore is some tiny bit smaller on the former. I’ll have to rummage through my stocks to see if I have any smaller boolits from Brooks and RRR moulds that cast 0.440”-0.441” (I think I shot them all up), but I would guess that you likely need a smaller diameter boolit. It would be worth your while to buy a couple boxes of castings of various diameters from Buffalo Arms or one of the other suppliers and get a measure of what you need down before investing in a mould. The general rule is to keep the paper as thin as possible. I’ve had good luck with the various 0.0015” tracing papers, and a lot of hassle with the thin tissue paper from gift packages. In theory, it should be the best of all, but it’s pretty fragile in my clumsy fingers.
Alternately, if you have a set of machinist pin gauges, you can check the bore at the muzzle and go from there.
If you want to go with groove diameter paper patching, the experts are Martinibelgian and the late great Montana Charlie. My experiments along this line have not met with success.