I've been wanting a Ruger super Blackhawk for some time now... and I'm getting the itch. 44 Mag.
It's 500 bucks cheaper than the Redhawk... Any other ones you think are better ?
Printable View
I've been wanting a Ruger super Blackhawk for some time now... and I'm getting the itch. 44 Mag.
It's 500 bucks cheaper than the Redhawk... Any other ones you think are better ?
If you can get a hunter model do so. IMHO they are the best hunting SBHs there are. I favor the Bisley configuration, others don't.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
You could give us a LOT more to go on than just price.
Will you be walking/standing/sitting as you hunt? Are you hunting deer? Scope, red dot or iron sights?
When it comes to heavy for caliber boolits, 44m and 45 Colt are pretty much neck and neck with energy, and powders used.
My tree stand revolver is a 7 1/2" SBH with Lee 310gr WFN over 17,0gr LilGun. My woods walker is a 5 1/2" medium frame Vaquero in 45 Schofield brass with 250gr OWC over 21.5gr H110.
The load for the SBH is quite stout, the load I use in the Vaquero is throttled back considerably, both loads reach just shy of 1200fps.
Let us know how you would like to use the revolver.
I absolutely love my SBH's! I have 2 in 44 Mag (one I purchased on this site!). Both are 100% original everything. I carry one more days than not horseback or just in the hills.
Practice, practice, practice! I have watched my step father in law go from basic training handgun in '65 to killing his first elk with one after 25 rounds at the range, I have shot elk off of my horse at a dead run, several deer, a black bear and uncountable critters since I purchased the first a few decades ago. No, not optic friendly but it is the best friend that you can carry or hunt with.
Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
I have tinnitus in my right ear from shots fired from various .44's at critters. Now I wear electronic earmuffs. Maybe a thread about training a horse to tolerate noise and muzzle blast is in order in the future. I am not a horse person but do remember Skeeter Skelton writing about shooting a mulie off the back of his horse once. The horse was not consulted in advance and protested to the point that Skeeter wound up on the ground among the rocks.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
I have owned em all !!! I love my Anaconda 6" have killed two deer with a 44Mag! Spend a little more. If you know a frendly local dealer you can get an Anaconda for under $1400
Like to have one for black bear. There's a huge bruin on the ridge where I hunt.
Well, beginning with cap guns - 22 Shorts, cowboy action ear plugs for my cayuse and we picked our ponies from the cavvy. It takes a lot of time and work! Would I shoot more than 5 yards from a horse??? HECK NO! But if they're breath feeling distance, listening to the hooves pound the snow - I would put my 2 spikes against any of the big bulls I've killed as far as trophies go!
Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
I have several hunting handguns from 480 ruger to 22lr. Most are blackhawks. My favorite is my 45 colt with 7 1/2” barrel
Which SBH you buy is strictly a matter of preference but in my experience, I would not have another one with the square back trigger guard. The danged thing beat my finger to death. I like the Super Redhawk Rugers but the SBH models can be made to have a lot better trigger easier. Both are great hunting guns. If you are going to scope it, the Super Redhawk comes with a pair of rings and they are super strong. Front sights on SRH's are easy to change. 44's and 45's handle boolits up to 300 grs and heavier if you need it and you would probably have to go to a 454 to get much improvement. But...it comes with considerable blast and recoil if you load it to full snort.
I have a SBH in 44, and was the first handgun that I used to take deer with.
Mine is scoped, I have also used the BH 41 mag with a 6.5" barrel, and a Ruger Vaquero with the 4 5/8" in 44 mag.
The last one was... a Remington 1858 clone in 44.
Been carrying the BH this season but, as of yet nothing has wandered up close enough.
RP
I have one with the 10.5-inch barrel. I bought mine the day after my friend let me shoot his Super Blackhawk. I was amazed at how on my second shot with this hand cannon - using only iron sights I could hit a soda can 500 feet out. I am a target shooter who can appreciate reports of these powerful handguns taking down big game out further than my eyes can see. As a target shooter, I do not need a double-action Redhawk- Target shooters and hunters are not having a shootout with the bad guys - we think before we shoot - no flinching - every shot is thought out. Again, the S Blackhawk is tack sharp accurate, handheld it amazed me how this powerful handgun was as accurate as a lightweight target pistol!
Many years ago, I bought a customized S&W 629 with a 8 3/8" barrel and a Nikon scope. That was when I learned I don't like optics on handguns.
Myself, I wouldn't hunt with a semi-auto...I know you didn't ask that, I just want to put that out there.
I've owned several revolvers. I'd prefer a double action, Probably a Redhawk would be my first choice. I'll like one I could holster...so a 6" barrel would be plenty long for me.
Also, it'll have to be 41 Mag :-P
That's my 2¢
I only had one. .45LC. Like Doug I loaded it hot with heavy bullets. Hitting clay pigeons at 100yd was fun. Never hunted with it, but, carried it when I was hunting.
After about a year I noticed my wrist would get sore after shooting. Second year it would stay sore all week. About that time is when Taffin wrote his piece on permanent damage from such shooting and I sold the gun.
Consider getting a Bisely grip if you have large hands. The trigger guard 'raps' the middle finger with heavy loads. Or you can get the 'ugly' pachmayr grips :)
I bought the first SBH I could get my hands on when they first introduced it in 1993.
I've since learned how to run a double-action revolver effectively to where I pretty much don't cock the hammer on one - ever.
My advice would be to spring for the Redhawk: you can still run it SA if that's your preference; you can load or dump all 6 at once; the cylinder has a little more room for longer bullet noses.
The Smith 629 is no slouch either if it fits your hand better.
I'm old enough to know I'd have a tough time even seeing a soda can at 500 feet, much less hitting it...... For most of us the bisley grip frame works just fine if we are going to wind it up a bit. For mild loads the Blackhawk frame works, as does the square back grip frame but if you start getting up into the 1100-1200 fps range it can start to get your attention.
Dick
I have only hunted with open sights but was a pretty decent revolver shot when my eyes were younger, and have killed deer, hogs, one turkey and a lot of small game with pistols (even knocked a few birds out of the sky once in a while).
In order, my besties were: Ruger Old Model Blackhawk, unconverted 3 screw, in 45 Colt, 7-1/2" bbl; model 29 S&W in 44 mag, 6-1/2" bbl; Colt SAA in 44 Special, 4-3/4" bbl; and a Ruger New Model Super Blackhawk 44 mag, 7-1/2" bbl (transfer bar version). I still have the first three and only sold the Super Blackhawk because I never liked the trigger pull. At this point in my life, I would be hard pressed to pick only one, but the Colt SAA is very accurate and lighter than the other two, although the Blackhawk .45 is a close second. The model 29 is large for a belt gun and carries better in a shoulder holster.
I carried a S&W model 57 41 mag with a 4" barrel for many years when hunting deer and it was also quite accurate. I once hit a jack rabbit with it at almost 120 yds but there was a fair bit of luck in that shot (and I was 25 years younger than now). I still have an old model Blackhawk in 41 mag but I'm leaning towards selling it because none of my sons who hunt carry a 41 - they all like 45 Colt.
Brings up the old adage "Load for bear!" I thought I'd toss this into the thread, anytime you load a revolver with a heavy boolit and a case full of slow-burning magnum powder, it will generate considerable recoil. Here is a post comparing Ruger single action grip frames:
https://castboolits.gunloads.com/sho...=1#post4972204
I think the most gun for the money in a hunting revolver is the BFR. I have one in 454 Casull, but 44 mag would work just as well for all but the largest (and most dangerous) game. Mine has an UltraDot sight on it, which helps a lot in low light.
https://i.imgur.com/4L9Zgmk.jpg
I fooled around for a short while with the Model 29 loads. So yeah I get the recoil, but not long enough to let it bother me. Looks like a good choice that Mamba posted, the BFR, grip looks like a winner.
The Bisley is more palm friendly, I take it. Maybe it's a good thing perimits take three months, it gives me time to do my homework.
Just looked at my Taurus 66 with the Hogue grip. It has what the BFR has behind the trigger guard, but it's rubber not Plastic.
As you can see by the many posts & experiences,, folks have their preferences and their reasons.
I say find the one that fits YOUR hands & that YOU can shoot the best. Look at the options you may desire,, such as a scope, or red dot optics, or even the open sights,, (maybe with the new RW/Fermin rear sight option,)
For the simplest operation, and the platform most seem to migrate to,, is the SA design over the DA design.
Yet,, the dragoon style g/f on the SBH is either hated or loved by shooters. This is where the "fits your hands" is very important.
For most folks,, especially handling heavier recoiling calibers,, the Bisley design seems to really be the best. And if you really want a better fit,, a RW Grip Frame that may work better than a factory grip.
If at all possible,, I'd see if I could find a gun range & gun owners with different guns to try out to assist in the final decision.
be alot easier if it was paperless. Buy one and bring it back and trade it. But having permits makes it more difficult. So yeah I need to be more selective. Sounds like you are for Bisley. You being who you are I'll take your word for it. Does Houge make grips for the Ruger bisley?
Here’s my 60 year old Super Blackhawk.
It’s shows some experience.
Attachment 321225
Totally personal issue. My SBH is the classic Colt Peacemaker profile with stock grips - I REALLY dislike the Bisley frame option myself, but they have a large following.
My Redhawk went through a couple aftermarkets before ending up with the original factory wood back on it.
I regard the Smiths as a having little more comfortable frame geometry, but the RH has a certain mechanical beastliness one has to admire.
Older Smiths were square butt only. New ones are round butt only with the option of square butt simulating grips.
If it's about feel for you, then our opinion isn't likely to help you much. Time to go tire-kicking!
Blackhawk, Super Blackhawk and Super Blackhawk Hunter are all basically Peacemaker clones as far as the grip shape goes. "Bisley" was a target range in England, and the name somehow got attached to a model of Colt that was used at those matches. The Bisley-style grip frame attached to a Colt or Ruger single action provides more of a vertical grip which some people like.
It's very similar to the difference between a WWI-spec 1911 with its flat mainspring housing (Bisley), and the WWII-spec 1911-A1 with its arched mainspring housing (Peacemaker). Generally, folks prefer one, and the other will be slightly "wrong".
I understand your issues with the paperwork in NJ. That truly does prevent a lot of experimentation. This is why I mentioned finding a gun range & others with guns to try before you buy one. Too bad you aren't anywhere near me,, I could let you try whatever you may consider.
As for my preferring a Bisley,, I'll share MY personal experiences.
When Ruger introduced the Bisley g/f on guns,, I figured they wouldn't sell too well. I even resisted trying them. Well, once I did try a few with heavier recoiling handguns,, I found that I, like so many others,, experienced better fit & comfort,,, plus grip control when using a Bisley vs the plow handle. But as noted above in a few places,, some prefer the plow handle design.
And some mention the knuckle busting of the Ruger Dragoon g/f over others.
This goes directly back to what fits YOUR hands.
As for Hogue & grips for a Bisley,, I don't think they offer rubber ones,, but I do think they offer wood ones. In shooting heavier recoiling handguns,, it's better to NOT fight the recoil,, but let the physics act as they will. If you look around you won't see any of the really heavy recoiling handguns using rubber grips,, & most will have a form of the Bisley as the design. The Freedom Arms is kinda a cross between a Bisley & a plow handle. And when you shoot a 454 or even larger calibers,, you do not want to try & stop the physics of the recoil going upwards.
I'm a SBH fan. I bought a Redhawk to hunt with. It shot nice, but it just didn't fit my hand. I tried a couple aftermarket grips, but they were no better. I gave up on the gun, gave it to my son-in-law, and went back to the SBH. The right handgun for hunting is the one you're most comfortable shooting.
As noted, choose the barrel length based on how you hunt. A longer barrel is nice for hunting from a blind or a stand, but the shorter barrel is preferred if you're spending your day on your feet.
My favorite shooter is a 7.5" SBH with iron sights. I hunt woods from a blind or stand so my shots are realistically max'ed out at 50-75 yds, and that barrel is more than adequate. I'm not one of those to attempt 100+ yds with a handgun. If I'm walking, the 5.5" is is my choice simply for comfort.
If I was hunting in a more open area there's a 10" .44 Contender barrel in the closet that would probably be put to use. For some reason I've avoided carrying the Contender for quite a few years. It gets brought out for shooting paper, but then put away for hunting season. Just preference I guess.