Originally Posted by
1hole
Bold? Or reasonable?
Okay, you ask and I can explain but I'm quite sure you already know exactly what I was saying.
In application, down where the real rubber actually hits the road, that 3rd law means, "all things move from order to disorder" and that means all things fall apart as they age. That's pure science, I believe it and it's obviously true even to a casual observer. But ....
"Scientists" who start from a position that, "There is no God so what we see absolutely has to have occurred by old things accidently falling into bigger and better things", i.e., things must have moved from simple forms to complex forms, from disorganized particles to highly organized, from dead stones to life systems .... and believing that my friend requires turning the Third Law of Thermodynamics on its head.
So, at its core, non-believing scientists MUST start from the rejection of God, otherwise their whole flimsy house of theoretical cards collapses in dust. Truth is, a LOT of very intelligent scientists ARE confirmed Christians but narrow minded and vicious peer group professional needs require them to be quite about it!
But, again, I'm certain you already knew all that so what's your point?