This is Trump's America, when you don't like what you hear just yell keep repeating that it's a cospiracy anyone who disagrees is a shill or a troll. Any science you don't like is fake, even if the data and methodology are easily obtained.
Printable View
Transmuting beneficial warming into the “Great Man-made Global Warming Scare”
Unfortunately, judging from the length of previous interglacials, the Holocene epoch should be drawing to its close.
By EDMH
Driven by the need to continually support the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming thesis, it seems that climate scientists are examining the temperature record at altogether too fine a scale, month by month, year by year.
Viewing the Holocene interglacial at a broader scale is much more fruitful, on a century by century and even on a millennial perspective.
https://www.iceagenow.info/wp-conten...-10000-yrs.png
Our current, warm, congenial Holocene interglacial has been the enabler of mankind’s civilisation for the last 10,000 years, spanning from mankind’s earliest farming to recent technology.
However Ice Core records, probably the most reliable long term record, show:
• the last millennium 1000AD – 2000AD has been the coldest millennium of the entire Holocene interglacial.
• each of the notable high points in the Holocene temperature record, (Holocene Climate Optimum – Minoan – Roman – Medieval – Modern), have been progressively colder than the previous high point.
• for its first 7000 – 8000 years the early Holocene, including its high point known as the “climate optimum”, have had virtually flat temperatures, an average drop of only ~0.007 °C per millennium.
• but the more recent Holocene, since a “tipping point” at ~1000BC, 3000 years ago, has seen temperature fall at about 20 times that earlier rate at about 0.14 °C per millennium.
• the Holocene interglacial is already 10 – 11,000 years old and judging from the length of previous interglacials, the Holocene epoch should be drawing to its close: in this century, the next century or this millennium.
Our current, warm, congenial Holocene interglacial has been the enabler of mankind’s civilisation for the last 10,000 years, spanning from mankind’s earliest farming to recent technology.
However Ice Core records, probably the most reliable long term record, show:
• the last millennium 1000AD – 2000AD has been the coldest millennium of the entire Holocene interglacial.
• each of the notable high points in the Holocene temperature record, (Holocene Climate Optimum – Minoan – Roman – Medieval – Modern), have been progressively colder than the previous high point.
• for its first 7000 – 8000 years the early Holocene, including its high point known as the “climate optimum”, have had virtually flat temperatures, an average drop of only ~0.007 °C per millennium.
• but the more recent Holocene, since a “tipping point” at ~1000BC, 3000 years ago, has seen temperature fall at about 20 times that earlier rate at about 0.14 °C per millennium.
• the Holocene interglacial is already 10 – 11,000 years old and judging from the length of previous interglacials, the Holocene epoch should be drawing to its close: in this century, the next century or this millennium.
• but the slight beneficial warming at the end of the 20th century to the Modern high point has been transmuted into the “Great Man-made Global Warming Scare”.
• the recent warming since the end of the Little Ice Age, (Black death, French revolution, etc.) has been wholly beneficial
As global temperatures have already been showing stagnation or cooling over the last nineteen years or more and as the sun spot record is diminishing substantially, the world should now fear the real and detrimental effects of cooling, rather than being hysterical about limited, beneficial or now non-existent further warming.
A real tipping point towards cooling and the end of the Holocene interglacial occurred about 3000 years ago.
This point is more fully illustrated here:
https://edmhdotme.wordpress.com/2015...bal-warming-2/
Post navigation
PREVIOUS POST
^^^^ This was something that was discussed in my gelology classes (the fact we seem to be in a warm interglacial period) when I received my degree in the early 80's. I don't see it referenced very much these days.
What keeps water from burning? Isn't it composed of two very flammable elements? Why is Carbon Dioxide classified as a pollutant when it is necessary for life? Why did I fall asleep in Science class? I know the answer to the last question. Best, Thomas.
Don 't know much about this stuff but was using Google earth and noticed the almost complete subduction ring at -60 deg. from the equator due to the shifting of the poles ( gyro effect). We're entering another field change, maybe we'll split in half. O2 isn't flamible unless you swap the electrodes.
I took Atmospheric science 301 in 1974. I wrote so many partial differential equations that it changed the way I write a "d".
But before you think I don't know anything.... There is a man on my street who has retired from Boeing. He was in the group at Boeing where Nye was an engineer there. Not at the same time, but kept contact with friends there. They complained that Nye never did any work at his day job, as he was obsessed with his comedy career.
Recently Boeing gave Nye an award for all the work he did there decades ago.
They also have a black engineer awards ceremony.
I don't know if they combined the two events.
In order:
1. Covalent bonds.
2. One flammable element and oxygen. When unbounded they are a highly flammable mixture.
3. Being necessary for life doesn't make something not a pollutant. Pollution means the introduction of something where it should not be, in layman's terms. Much like the bacteria in your colon are necessary for your digestion, introducing them into other parts of your body is disastrous. With carbon dioxide, too much of it in the atmosphere accelerates warming. It also dissolves more into the oceans, harming coral populations, which harms fish populations.
4. You had a poor teacher?