Originally Posted by
45 2.1
I note that Edds join date is Feb 2008, Matts join date is Mar 2005, Mikes join date is Jan 2006, my join date is Mar 2005. I have 109 e-mails from Mike that give a different story than the BS statement he made given above where he clearly states just who told him the alloy. As for not interjecting something that has already been done and written about for about 100 years.....You never, ever mentioned that in the past either. Seems to me that two and a half years ago would have been a good time. If you had the books why not share them? nobody from Michigan has taken much at face value,What were we supposed to take at face value? Exagerrated claims made here at Cast Boolits with a keyboard? You brought one Ruger semi-auto .45 pistol with 7 rounds to the first get together at Bruce's house. The next year we traveled to your place in Southern Illinois with my camper and you brought out a 24/47 Yugo shooting the 200 grn 8mm SIL loaded over 15 grains of Unique; and a few Mosin Nagant carbines that you didn't shoot, but judging by the rust I saw in the end of their bores I could tell you'd been shooting them with corrosive milsurp ammo. The third year you brought the new Marlin Stainless .357 Mag carbine which shot incredibly at 300 yards with your 360640-PBHP; and a semi-auto Soumi 9mm that none of us that tried it could hit anything with. Fourth year was a scratch due to conflicting schedules. And last summer, a 1903 Springfield with some low powered load that sounded like 13-15 grains of Unique again, the same 24/47 Yugo with the same 200 grn SIL and 15 grains of Unique, again. And, a Remington 25-06 with a load you said was 2,400 fps; but really turned out to be 1,900 fps when it was shot over my chronograph. Common denominator, nothing over 2,000 fps yet. Even after you had been told several times by Mike, Edd, and Bruce to bring the rifles with the high velocity sooper dooper pooper scooper clumping filler loads and shoot the darn things in front of us (or have Bruce shoot the groups) as witnesses to the fact that your 6.5 Swede load techniques worked at the velocities claimed with accuracy you still didn't do it. Instead we got excuses. all of you had to try it to see if it was true. It does no good to tell you anything until your ready to here it.I've heard a lot and spent a lot of time trying to decipher it. Mostly vague and incomplete information. Quite a bit of it contradictory if one goes back to the "teacher" for more info often enough. Always something left out that somebody didn't do right or was accused of not listening the first time. Another kernal of info that doesn't change the results for those that were trying. Matt, Bruce, Edd... you want to see Mikes e-mails, I would forward them to you.