Originally Posted by
Gussers
Unfortunately, Tinkercad can't load the base, it's too big a file. Also, the hole placement seems optimal to me. The rearmost holes are best for being able to mount the body and tilt it rearward. The bracket is also placed under the weight of the bullets or cases as opposed to the side where there is more leverage. I also noticed printing the AM bullet feeder there are 3 different files. What I'm suggesting is the offset of the motor would mean all those versions aren't necessary as the 45 degree mounting would allow access to all the existing holes. There could be one body for the smaller 370 motor and one body for the larger version of that motor. It's also the difference between buying a $28 motor and a $75 motor. If the less expensive one has the same specs and the only downside is it interferes with mounting, they why not change the mounting slightly so it doesn't interfere? It simplifies the number of versions that need to be maintained and lowers the overall cost considerably.