PDA

View Full Version : How to measure groove dia on 5 groove bore?



63 Shiloh
11-01-2010, 12:40 AM
Hello to all,

I am interested in hearing how people are measuring the groove diameter of a slug pushed through a 5 groove barrel, such as my 686.

Any ideas of tips welcome.

Mike

chris in va
11-01-2010, 12:58 AM
Here's how my brain works...

I'm sure there's a much better way of doing it, and the others will tell you. But I'd put the slug on a drill and spin it. Carefully place the calipers on the slug as it's rotating.

It's late, I'm tired...but just a thought.

Trifocals
11-01-2010, 01:04 AM
Normally this is accomplished using a "V" micrometer. This type micrometer is most often used to measure the diameter of five flute reamers. There is another method involving the use of a "V" block, but I am not familiar with the procedure. LOL

legi0n
11-01-2010, 02:06 AM
I've seen somewhere a hole gauge for sale. It had quite a few holes based on a given diameter. Like .357-001", .357-002", .357", .357+001" .357+002"... Quite expensive though.

oneokie
11-01-2010, 03:09 AM
Hello to all,

I am interested in hearing how people are measuring the groove diameter of a slug pushed through a 5 groove barrel, such as my 686.

Any ideas of tips welcome.

Mike

To measure without specialized equipment:

# 1 Use a piece of flexible, but fairly stiff shim material (a strip of soda or beer can works well). Measure the thickness of the shim material and double this number.

#2 Wrap this piece of material around the slug and measure the diameter of the wrapped slug. Use a light touch with the measuring instrument, so as to not obtain a false reading.

#3 Subtract the measurement obtained in step #1 from the measurement obtained in step #3.

This gives you the groove diameter of the odd number rifled barrel.

DWM
11-01-2010, 05:16 AM
Hi , if someone post how to use the V blok I'll appreciated , I read about this metod but never how to use the block..

Thank you

DWM

Nobade
11-01-2010, 09:55 AM
I bought a V anvil mic on Ebay for cheap. I use it for bore slugs as well as measuring throat reamers and other 5 flute cutting tools. Seems there is less demand for mics like this than normal ones, so it didn't bring much money. New ones are really pricy.

Rocky Raab
11-01-2010, 10:31 AM
I've used the "turn it by hand and adjust the mic until you can no longer can" method. Do it a few times on different places of the soft slug to avoid smearing and average the results. While not absolutely accurate, it is certainly accurate enough for our needs.

runfiverun
11-01-2010, 11:00 AM
i'd just get close on the bore, and worry about the cylinder throats that's what's gonna make or break you anyways.
if your getting say 358ish with rocky's or nolan's method.
but 356 or357 on the cylinder throats you got issues to deal with.

mdi
11-01-2010, 11:04 AM
I've used the "turn it by hand and adjust the mic until you can no longer can" method. Do it a few times on different places of the soft slug to avoid smearing and average the results. While not absolutely accurate, it is certainly accurate enough for our needs.

I've used this method as a machinist to measure parts that were slightly out of round or had chatter. Works surprisingly well...

Pepe Ray
11-01-2010, 01:20 PM
Measureing a spinning object is a great way to ruin your calipers or injure your self -OR - both,

Watch for P.M. Shiloh.
Pepe Ray

Rocky Raab
11-01-2010, 01:22 PM
Did you perhaps miss my "turn by hand" qualification?

geargnasher
11-01-2010, 01:48 PM
Rocky, I think that was directed at Chris in Va, not you.

+1 on gently rotate the slug through the anvils of a micrometer, using a feather touch. The "lands" of the slug itself are usually wide enough to almost overlap a cross-sectionional measurement and can be felt accurately enough. Too much pressure on the thimble and they get rounded-off easily, though. Calipers aren't good enough in my book for meausuring slugs, for a tolerance of +/- .001" at best can give you a measurement far enough off to cause trouble. Even using calipers as a comparator doesn't come close enough in my book since .0005" over- or undersized can make a difference in accuracy, safety, and function.

As has been mentioned, I wouldn't sweat the groove dimension much, the cylinder throats are far more important for boolit size in revolvers. I only use the barrel slug as a point of reference for determining if the cylinder throats need to be reamed and, more importantly, if there is a restriction at the forcing cone from the barrel thread crush. Forcing cone restriction can be determined by driving one slug all the way through from the muzzle, and another one to within 1" of the forcing cone and back out the muzzle again and measuring the difference.

Gear

Char-Gar
11-01-2010, 01:58 PM
I have been measuring slugs pushed through 5 groove smith and wesson pistol for many years with an ordinary 1 inch Starrett micrometer. I have read time and time again where, it can't be done but it can.

There is one very small spot of the trailing edges of the slug where there is full groove diameter. I open the jaws of the mike until it is a a couple of thousands smaller than grove and slowly rotate the slug with one hand and open the mic jaws with the other until there is just a kiss of a feel as the slug fully rotates past that sweet spot. It takes a little practice to get the feel.

Don't horse the slug through the jaws as you can mash the slug just enough to get a false reading.

I have done it scores of time and it works. To check, I have had folks check my measurements with their supper duper specialized tools and it is always the same as my method.

It continues to amaze me how many folks just take other folks word that this or that can't be done, when most of the time the folks that told them that are just repeating what they read or heard from somebody else. If everybody took no for an answer before they tried it for themselves, we would still be living in caves.

P.S..... I can save you all that measuring stuff. Just size you bullet as per below, drop the loaded round in your cylinder and it the plop right in go shooting and never look back.

38/357 MAG ... .358 or .359 is your mold is large enough to allow it.
44/44 Mag.... .431 or .432 if you mold is large enough to allow it.

geargnasher
11-01-2010, 02:03 PM
Uh, Chargar, nobody was disputing that here, in fact you back up my post quite nicely. The only time I could see it not working is if the barrel had abnormally narrow grooves, which Smith's don't.

Gear

Rocky Raab
11-01-2010, 03:46 PM
Reading back, I see that post that Pepe was probably referencing. Thanks, geargnasher.

I do think that a caliper that reads to .001" is plenty good enough, however. How often have we heard "When in doubt, size it a thousandth or two larger" when discussing the right size for cast bullets? If that's reasonable advice (and I think it is) then a caliper that reads to .001" ought to give us all the accuracy we need. We aren't fitting precision parts here. Lead is soft, deforms easily - in both directions - and we probably change its diameter when we cram it into the case, anyway.

chris in va
11-01-2010, 06:41 PM
I'm not saying spin the sucker up to 1000rpm, just enough to keep the caliper from settling in a groove.

BCB
11-01-2010, 07:37 PM
If you are a member of Cast Bullets Association and receive “The Fouling Shot” magazine, there is a gentleman in there who will measure the diameter of odd number rifling boolits for free…

Years ago I sent him a couple of slugs that had been imprinted with the rifling of a barrel that had odd number of grooves and he did the measuring…

Good-luck…BCB

mpmarty
11-01-2010, 07:47 PM
and we probably change its diameter when we cram it into the case, anyway.
According to quantum theory we change the diameter by measuring it.

felix
11-01-2010, 07:51 PM
Yeah, and the barrel changes diameter every time we shoot a boolit through it. ... felix

geargnasher
11-01-2010, 10:03 PM
Reading back, I see that post that Pepe was probably referencing. Thanks, geargnasher.


I do think that a caliper that reads to .001" is plenty good enough, however. How often have we heard "When in doubt, size it a thousandth or two larger" when discussing the right size for cast bullets? If that's reasonable advice (and I think it is) then a caliper that reads to .001" ought to give us all the accuracy we need. We aren't fitting precision parts here. Lead is soft, deforms easily - in both directions - and we probably change its diameter when we cram it into the case, anyway.

Rocky, I must respectfully disagree with your statement that we aren't fitting precision parts here. At my house, that's exactly what I do when building ammo, because it yields the best results. YMMV.

Most calipers have a tolerance of +/-.001", and that means it could measure a .357" slug at .356". If you size to .357", you might wonder why you get leading in the first two inches of the barrel. Or it could be the other way. This has been debated to death here many times, I only bring it up each time for the consideration of those newer folks who may be reading this. A Harbor Freight digital caliper set is great for measuring many things, but isn't really precise enough for getting the best possible boolit fit.

Gear

Pepe Ray
11-01-2010, 10:38 PM
Gear;
Thanks for looking after me. I do need it on many occasions. Because my instructor in "technical comp.#101" influenced me to "be brief", I sometimes don't include all of the pertinent information.
Actually, I rarely post unless I can see someone getting hurt because of a misunderstanding, or feeling lubed. [smilie=1:
Pepe Ray

Char-Gar
11-01-2010, 11:39 PM
gearnasher. I wasn't taking issue with your post as I didn't read it or others. I just answered the question about how I did such things.

noylj
11-01-2010, 11:51 PM
Talk about quantum paradoxes:
I measured my .40S&W dummy round at 1.2063". I then pressed the nose against the bench to measure bullet set-back. New measurement was 1.2075". It grew!!!

geargnasher
11-02-2010, 12:11 AM
gearnasher. I wasn't taking issue with your post as I didn't read it or others. I just answered the question about how I did such things.

I was ribbing you because you didn't just answer the question, you went out of your way to make a whole paragraph plus one sentence defending your post from dissenters which didn't in fact exist in this thread! :groner: Now that I know you didn't read any of the other posts that makes sense, and that's all I was trying to figure out.

Gear

Char-Gar
11-02-2010, 12:09 PM
Gear... I long ago stop reading the threads and just tried to answer the original post.

I do not know the background, or experience or most of the new posters, so I try and be comprehensive in my answer to give some context and breadth to my answer. At times some of the original posters get a little miffed at the excess of information, thinking I am talking down to them. But that is not the case,as I don't know what they know or don't know. Tis true that I tend to give $5 answer to 50 cent questions and some folks don't want the extra $4.50. But that is just the way of it!

Every once in a while, some responder to the original post gets a little miffed thinking I am trying to undercut or argue with them. Such is not the case as I didn't read their responses.

Life is too short to get into pissing matches on the Internet.

alamogunr
11-02-2010, 12:26 PM
If you are a member of Cast Bullets Association and receive “The Fouling Shot” magazine, there is a gentleman in there who will measure the diameter of odd number rifling boolits for free…

Years ago I sent him a couple of slugs that had been imprinted with the rifling of a barrel that had odd number of grooves and he did the measuring…

Good-luck…BCB

I believe you are referring to O.H. McKagen He posted a notice in The Fouling Shot some time back that he was discontinuing the service. His reason was that he was in his 90's and no longer able to keep up.

It would be nice if someone would pick up the slack and provide the same service for a fee. There will always be those like me that are forever unsure of their results when trying to "make do".

John
W.TN

BCB
11-02-2010, 02:34 PM
alamogunr,

Yep, that was the guy...

That is too bad as there aren't many people who would do that task for nothing...

Devoted to his hobby as well as ours...

BCB

45nut
11-22-2010, 03:59 PM
I have a small supply of v-blocks to move. Not sure what to ask but considering the machine work and time $20.00 shipped should be fair? ?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/45nut/P1040045.jpg

Doc Highwall
11-22-2010, 08:01 PM
This will help you.

blackthorn
11-24-2010, 01:49 PM
Doc Highwall:---I can not make out the numbers on your "drawing" for the "constant". Can you clarify please. Thanks, have a great day.

Doc Highwall
11-24-2010, 07:13 PM
blackthorn, that measurement is unique to the V-Block that you have, all you have to do is measure your own block as the measurements are taken from the bottom of the V-Block where it contacts the surface plate.

Mk42gunner
11-24-2010, 10:45 PM
There is a small article in one of the Handloader's Digests, (17th Ed. I think) that explains the use of a vee block and gives angles and dimensions.

Robert

Pepe Ray
11-24-2010, 10:49 PM
blackthorn, doc and ALL;
Not being a math major, I'm not sure how to differentiate between
constant B which is .8944 and unique to the 108* V
VS
the constant C which is unique to each individual V- blok and determined by measuring during the construction of the blok.

All V-bloks of 108* will incorporate a formular requireing the .8944
The remainder of the formular requires the number scratched into the side of THAT individual blok and NO OTHER. That identified as "C"

Pepe Ray

alamogunr
11-24-2010, 11:17 PM
Blackthorn gives the formula here:

http://castboolits.gunloads.com/showthread.php?t=87625&highlight=block

Post #19

I haven't verified it but I seem to remember that others did when this was discussed earlier. I've ordered one of the V blocks from 45Nut and will do that as soon as I receive it. I will use a plug gage of known diameter to verify. Initially I will assume that the included angle is 108º.

I'm not mathematician either but I think I remember enough basic math to work through the formula.

Mk42gunner: I think I have that Handloader's Digest. I'll check the shop in the morning. Thanks for the reference.

John
W.TN

blackthorn
11-25-2010, 10:54 AM
Thanks!!