Bret4207
09-11-2010, 04:31 PM
Just read the article Mike. Just a couple thoughts.
I agree a single ten shot group isn't a very good "test", although it's worlds above a series of 3 or 5 shot groups. Ten 10 shot groups is a whole 'nuther thing.
On you grouping patterns- I can;t help but wonder if the alloy or boolit design were changed if that would have an impact. My theory is that different alloys will react differently with the same powder charge. Most of us are using WW based alloys and you're using a lead-tin binary alloy. I wonder if that might account for my experience differing from yours? I've found a boolit up to .002 over groove will almost always give better accuracy in the long run. BUT, every now and again an odd ball gun or load crops up that wants the boolit right at groove diameter or only .001 over. Why? Alloy, boolit design, pressure curve, barrel condition, the way I squint, star position, or the favorite excuse- it's Bush's fault!
Kinda nice to see a big time world famous gun writer admitting all is not as we are told.
I agree a single ten shot group isn't a very good "test", although it's worlds above a series of 3 or 5 shot groups. Ten 10 shot groups is a whole 'nuther thing.
On you grouping patterns- I can;t help but wonder if the alloy or boolit design were changed if that would have an impact. My theory is that different alloys will react differently with the same powder charge. Most of us are using WW based alloys and you're using a lead-tin binary alloy. I wonder if that might account for my experience differing from yours? I've found a boolit up to .002 over groove will almost always give better accuracy in the long run. BUT, every now and again an odd ball gun or load crops up that wants the boolit right at groove diameter or only .001 over. Why? Alloy, boolit design, pressure curve, barrel condition, the way I squint, star position, or the favorite excuse- it's Bush's fault!
Kinda nice to see a big time world famous gun writer admitting all is not as we are told.