Texasflyboy
12-24-2009, 01:16 PM
I recently acquired a new style of #503, a 503SX 4 cavity mould. It's a late production mould (thick handles, with serial number). I have surmised that the design is the Keith .44 bullet, (503) heavy ("S" @ ~290 grains) with an eXperimental change to a thicker front driving band and shorter extended base. This experimental design appears to move more of the bullet weight outside of the case.
The photos are descriptions are for those interested in the Keith designs. For comparative purposes, I included photos of a "standard" 503S combo mould, which is a 4 cavity mould that has two different cavity styles, two cavities are the standard 503 design, and two are the 503S extended base design which brings the weight up to around ~290 grains. Note that in the combo mould, the front driving band is noticeably thinner than in the 503SX mould.
I invite comments regarding the designs and the intent behind the 503SX design change.
Merry Christmas to all....
The photos:
First....the original 503S combo 4 cavity mould:
http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX2.jpg
And for comparison, the newly acquired 503SX 4 cavity mould with the thicker front driving band and shorter extended base:
http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX3.jpg
The three projectile designs side by side for comparison and labeled:
http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX1.jpg
The same photo, as a hyperlink, without any labels:
503SX Unlabeled photo (http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX5.jpg)
The three different cavity designs side by side for comparative purposes:
http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX4.jpg
Both Moulds side by side for comparison (Large High Res File >3MB):
503S & 503SX Blocks side by side (http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX6.jpg)
And the edge delineation for the profiles. Notice the 2X denser venting on the 503SX, I would guess that is also part of the eXperimentation. Easy to see the larger driving band on the 503SX:
http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX7.jpg
The photos are descriptions are for those interested in the Keith designs. For comparative purposes, I included photos of a "standard" 503S combo mould, which is a 4 cavity mould that has two different cavity styles, two cavities are the standard 503 design, and two are the 503S extended base design which brings the weight up to around ~290 grains. Note that in the combo mould, the front driving band is noticeably thinner than in the 503SX mould.
I invite comments regarding the designs and the intent behind the 503SX design change.
Merry Christmas to all....
The photos:
First....the original 503S combo 4 cavity mould:
http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX2.jpg
And for comparison, the newly acquired 503SX 4 cavity mould with the thicker front driving band and shorter extended base:
http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX3.jpg
The three projectile designs side by side for comparison and labeled:
http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX1.jpg
The same photo, as a hyperlink, without any labels:
503SX Unlabeled photo (http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX5.jpg)
The three different cavity designs side by side for comparative purposes:
http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX4.jpg
Both Moulds side by side for comparison (Large High Res File >3MB):
503S & 503SX Blocks side by side (http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX6.jpg)
And the edge delineation for the profiles. Notice the 2X denser venting on the 503SX, I would guess that is also part of the eXperimentation. Easy to see the larger driving band on the 503SX:
http://hgmould.gunloads.com/molds/503SX/503SX7.jpg