jonk
10-20-2009, 09:27 AM
So I have a Lee 170gr 'cruise missle' where the gas check falls off.
Strike that, it will stay on if I size it to .264 but that rather defeats the purpose, doesn't it?
Sizing to .269 it seems to remove the slight flare on the check but not crimp it on, and sure enough it drops off reliably while handling. Really only the stickiness of the lube is holding it to the base.
Reading another thread with similar subject matter, some have advocated lapping out the gas check shank. Easy enough I'm sure. However someone else suggested superglue.
Just wondering about the 'easy fix' here- assuming the base isn't seated below the bottom of the neck have you all found this to be adequate? Right now I'm using fillers when I don't really (otherwise) need to to provide assurances that the check doesn't fall into the case but would welcome a change from that. But even then, am interested in the down range performance of superglued checked bullets. I have some old Lyman press fit checks to use up too and this would be applicable there as well.
Strike that, it will stay on if I size it to .264 but that rather defeats the purpose, doesn't it?
Sizing to .269 it seems to remove the slight flare on the check but not crimp it on, and sure enough it drops off reliably while handling. Really only the stickiness of the lube is holding it to the base.
Reading another thread with similar subject matter, some have advocated lapping out the gas check shank. Easy enough I'm sure. However someone else suggested superglue.
Just wondering about the 'easy fix' here- assuming the base isn't seated below the bottom of the neck have you all found this to be adequate? Right now I'm using fillers when I don't really (otherwise) need to to provide assurances that the check doesn't fall into the case but would welcome a change from that. But even then, am interested in the down range performance of superglued checked bullets. I have some old Lyman press fit checks to use up too and this would be applicable there as well.