LBT .452 360gr WFN compare to 360gr WLN

[Snyd]

Anyone have any experience comparing these two? I found a load I like for my 4" Redhawk using the Cast Performance 360gr WFNGC bullet. I'd like to cast my own. I see LBT has a 350gr WFN and the 360gr WLN moulds. What's the difference?

[475/480]

The only difference is the nose length,the WFN is say .360" and the WLN would be .450" (as an example).Same meplat 80%.
WLN stands for Wide Long Nose.
WFN " ----Wide Flat Nose.



Sean

[shotman]

The other thing is it cost way more to set up to cast your own. The LBT is the best out there if you go that way.

[only1asterisk]

I think the long nosed version shoots better at the far end of my abilities.

[Snyd]

The only difference is the nose length,the WFN is say .360" and the WLN would be .450" (as an example).Same meplat 80%.
WLN stands for Wide Long Nose.
WFN " ----Wide Flat Nose.
Sean

Thanks guys but....
I just realized I had a typo in my post. I meant to say:
I see LBT has a 350gr WFN and the 360gr LFN (not WLN) moulds. What's the difference?

I know what WFN, LFN and WLN mean. But, does the LFN have a smaller metplate? I do know a 300gr LFN has a smaller metplate than a 335 WFN, at least in the Cast Performance bullets.