Stoats
05-04-2009, 04:02 PM
Probably a duplicate thread, but anyway...
After having great success with this bullet and around 6.5gn of Ba10 (Bullseye equivalent) in .303 Brit, I want to replicate this load in 7,62x39 with the same powder.
What I'm looking for is a 7.62x39 load that is just subsonic (incidentally, 6.9gn Ba10 just goes supersonic in my .303"), around 1050-1100fps from an 18" bbl.
Ed Harris's sticky article, which recommends 6-7gns of fast powder in 303 & larger suggests, strangely, no more than 4gn in 7.62x39. This seems a little on the low side, seeing as other loads at higher velocities quoted seem to be just 12-15% lower.
Indeed, with the lighter 314-90gn bullet, loads from people on here run at around 3.2gns in 303 and 2.7gns in 7.62x39, around 15% lower.
Thus, one would imagine that with the 160gn bullet one should be using something in the region of 5.1-6.2gns of fast powder.
Does Ed know something I don't, or was his <4gn load only for 50 yds and less?
After having great success with this bullet and around 6.5gn of Ba10 (Bullseye equivalent) in .303 Brit, I want to replicate this load in 7,62x39 with the same powder.
What I'm looking for is a 7.62x39 load that is just subsonic (incidentally, 6.9gn Ba10 just goes supersonic in my .303"), around 1050-1100fps from an 18" bbl.
Ed Harris's sticky article, which recommends 6-7gns of fast powder in 303 & larger suggests, strangely, no more than 4gn in 7.62x39. This seems a little on the low side, seeing as other loads at higher velocities quoted seem to be just 12-15% lower.
Indeed, with the lighter 314-90gn bullet, loads from people on here run at around 3.2gns in 303 and 2.7gns in 7.62x39, around 15% lower.
Thus, one would imagine that with the 160gn bullet one should be using something in the region of 5.1-6.2gns of fast powder.
Does Ed know something I don't, or was his <4gn load only for 50 yds and less?