View Full Version : Well, that worked well
I posted a few days back about anyone having data for a 158 gr bullet for a 9mm round. Kinda outside the box. A few people said yes, such data existed, namely 3 gr of Bullseye.
Well I tried it with a Lee 158 gr SWC GC design in a Walther P1. I'd not previously had much luck with lead in this gun.
Worked great. I started with 2 gr, then 2.5, finally 3.
All functioned and fed (surprisingly) well. 2 barely functioned, 2.5 was just right, 3 felt a tad stiff. 2.5 was also best accuracy wise.
No leading. In fact it scrubbed out most of the leading that had been in the barrel. ACWW with 50/50.
Will load up some more with 2.5 and see what I get. :drinks:
NSP64
12-01-2008, 12:27 AM
Sometimes you must tread where few have gone.:drinks:
jdgabbard
12-01-2008, 01:28 PM
If you have a 9mm rifle, I'd like to know how well they work in that. I have a Ruger PC9 Carbine and have thought about this many times. However, never have messed with working up a load. I would be interested in your results though!
beagle
12-01-2008, 01:41 PM
Yeah, 158 grainers are a bit out of the box weight wise.
I've fired a bunch of 148 grainers and they were dissapointing to me performance wise.
Dropping down to 140 grainers (Lyman's 358480) and HPing for a 133 grainer gave me agreat small game load that I use a lot. Still, it's no streaker velocity wise./beagle
S.R.Custom
12-01-2008, 01:55 PM
Yeah, 158 grainers are a bit out of the box weight wise.
Years ago I was on an accuracy quest with my Beretta 92. Bore measurement revealed a groove diameter of .357", which I have since discovered is standard for service 9mms. Putting .355" lead downrange was an exercise in futility...
So I had these .358" 158 gr LSWCs laying around, and I said, "I wonder..."
The neat thing about the Beretta is the fact that it'll feed nearly anything; if you can get it in the magazine, it'll feed. For the experiment, I used 231... can't recall the exact amount, but 3 grains sounds familiar. Anyway, I ended up eliminating the leading problem, and shrinking group sizes by 1/2 over previous best.
Subsequent experimentation with that bullet and maximum charges of AA#7 yeilded a fairly stiff 9mm load that chrono'ed major. A most satisfying load for bowling pin shooting, as pins for the 9mm are set closer to the back of the table, in deference to the 9mm's perceived lack of power... :twisted:
AzShooter
12-01-2008, 03:04 PM
Years ago I shot a Glock 17L in USPSC competition. I experimented a lot with it and eventually decided to shoot 158 grain lead bullets because that was the same stuff I loaded in my revolver.
Bullseye worked very well for a nice light accurate load.
I also experimented enough to make Major power factor with the 9 mm while it was still legal. Since then USPSA changed the rules to eliminate Major 9 and now has allowed it again.
There are great choices of powder. In Handloader Magazine there is an excellent article on reloading the 9 mm and it discusses heavy bullets. I wouldn't try real hot ones out of your Walther but a concervative load of .158 grain bullets will shoot tight, lead less and group well.
Good Shooting
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.