sghart3578
07-06-2020, 12:25 PM
I was reading a previous thread where the OP was asking if there were any significant differences in the terminal performance between these two designs and it prompted me to ask this question.
In my Marlin 1894CS I load two different bullets. A RCBS 38-162-SWC and a Accurate 36-185M. The RCBS looks like a copy of the 358156GC and the Accurate mold is a LBT style WFN, similar to the NOE 360-180 WFN.
The RCBS LSWC weighs 172 gr with the gas check and the Accurate weighs 182 gr with a gas check.
I load both over 12.5 gr of 2400 with a standard primer. Here's my question.
Both seem to be equally accurate, 4-5 " groups at 100 yards. This is with a peep sight from a bench. I admit I am not that great a rifleman.
The POI of the heavier bullet is consistently 6-7" lower than the lighter bullet. The weights don't seem to be that much different. Is the lower POI because the WFN has more drag on it?
I realize that this is not a giant problem in the scheme of things but it has always been in the back of my head. And the experts here always have the answer.
Thanks for your time,
Steve in N CA
In my Marlin 1894CS I load two different bullets. A RCBS 38-162-SWC and a Accurate 36-185M. The RCBS looks like a copy of the 358156GC and the Accurate mold is a LBT style WFN, similar to the NOE 360-180 WFN.
The RCBS LSWC weighs 172 gr with the gas check and the Accurate weighs 182 gr with a gas check.
I load both over 12.5 gr of 2400 with a standard primer. Here's my question.
Both seem to be equally accurate, 4-5 " groups at 100 yards. This is with a peep sight from a bench. I admit I am not that great a rifleman.
The POI of the heavier bullet is consistently 6-7" lower than the lighter bullet. The weights don't seem to be that much different. Is the lower POI because the WFN has more drag on it?
I realize that this is not a giant problem in the scheme of things but it has always been in the back of my head. And the experts here always have the answer.
Thanks for your time,
Steve in N CA