PDA

View Full Version : Tested my new (to me ) Lyman 457125 mold powder coated bullets



Big Mak
02-24-2017, 09:25 PM
Sorry, incorrect title, it is the 457193 mold!
This was a comparison of two bullet types with the same smokeless AA5744 low pressure powder loads, almost...I had .2 grains more in the Powder coated bullets. (26 gr vs 26.2)


Mind you, I was testing velocity first, and accuracy 2nd. I didn't see much difference on accuracy at 100 yards.


The biggest difference I saw was when I cleaned the bore after 10 shots of Powder coated and non-powder coated. Much cleaner barrel on the PC bullets. Makes sense though, no lube on PC bullets!




Rifle: .45-70 (1883 cartouche)-Trapdoor with a .458 slugged bore diameter.
Bullet:Lyman mold cast 425 gr bullet-(457193) powder coated- Sized to .458
Powder:AA5744 26.2 grains
Primer: CCI Rifle Magnum
Notes: EXCELLENT Spread on the velocity.Cleaner bore than lead bullets after shooting 10 rds. One "Hole through hole" shot.
http://thefirearmsforum.s3.amazonaws.com/2017/02/182309_43e82399b54d00d50f174d6ff4a8c204.jpg
http://thefirearmsforum.s3.amazonaws.com/2017/02/182310_46bec3f91269b2bb80893bdd5662b788.jpg
http://thefirearmsforum.s3.amazonaws.com/2017/02/182311_0594a6acf875756e3cdd27908a2b08be.jpg



Rifle: .45-70 (1883 cartouche)-Trapdoor with a .458 slugged bore diameter.
Bullet: Missouri 405 gr Blue lubed bullet. Sized to .459
Powder:AA5744 26.0 grains
Primer: CCI Rifle Magnum
Notes: slightly dirtier bore than PC bullets after shooting 10 rds.

http://thefirearmsforum.s3.amazonaws.com/2017/02/182312_23f3c120ed20fdcf4b310ea162d3ef87.jpg
http://thefirearmsforum.s3.amazonaws.com/2017/02/182313_e556cee3a37d235357c817ab0671ce11.jpg
http://thefirearmsforum.s3.amazonaws.com/2017/02/182314_73e190e666a9e4c5d7a65371376af076.jpg

Big Mak
02-24-2017, 09:32 PM
Oh, the lead for the cast bullets I made were 20 to 1.
The Missouri bullets I believe are an 18 BHN hardness.

Both patches were "First patch through" before cleaning the bore good.

Wayne Smith
03-02-2017, 04:03 PM
All I see is powder residue with some lube on the second patch. No lead at all. Good loading.

308Jeff
03-02-2017, 04:13 PM
Love those Std Deviation numbers.

Big Mak
03-02-2017, 04:13 PM
Well, I am amazed how great the bore is in this old rifle. .458 when slugged. It loves .459 bullets!

Big Mak
03-02-2017, 04:15 PM
Love those Std Deviation numbers.

I cannot even get close to the Std Dev number with my .357 magnum loads (60). I was trying CFE Pistol Powder and while a great powder for .45ACP and 9mm, it performs erratically with a .357 mag load.

NoAngel
03-02-2017, 04:40 PM
You oughta pick up some red and white powder coat to go with your blue. That ole Trapdoor would appreciate a little patriotism.

Nice shooting. I love it when innovation keeps the old war horses saddled and ready to ride.

17nut
03-02-2017, 04:45 PM
Have you tried lubing just the bottom 1 or 2 grooves instead of all of them?
Sometimes a bullet can be to slippery and that causes high SD numbers.

Big Mak
03-02-2017, 05:54 PM
17Nut, just checked my chrono data, it was my 45 Colt ammo with CFE pistol that had the high standard dev number.
I'm still working that one out, but I think I have it narrowed down to the powder.

M-Tecs
03-02-2017, 08:34 PM
Well, I am amazed how great the bore is in this old rifle. .458 when slugged. It loves .459 bullets!

I have heard and read that some do slug .458". I just have never been lucky enough to find one.