pjh421
06-08-2008, 02:57 AM
Hi All,
I was just toying with the bullet mould design software at mountainmolds.com, trying to come up with a good, short-range .44 caliber defense boolit to be fired from a Smith 329 PD (only comes in 4 inch). I like the 300-grain weight range and the tangential ogive profile like the WFN’s and Lee’s 310-grain. I’m not trying to drill one-hole groups at 100 yards or anything like that. While I don’t enjoy being bludgeoned by guns, I don’t really mind recoil of this level since this isn’t intended to be a plinker either. I’ll load it up to a speed I can handle and stop there.
Right now it looks like a plain base WW bullet with a single lube groove for less hassle in the Star die I’m going to ask Buckshot to make, two driving bands, a .350 length nose and an 80% meplat. I could be convinced to reduce that to 70% for ease of loading via speedloader though. I think this is a really cool boolit but I’ve only shot standard designs up to this point so feel free to poke holes in my theories. I’m hoping that at the speeds I can expect to launch these boolits, they won’t fly like bumblebees. The software asks for a 1 in 27” twist and we all know Smiths have a 1 in 18 & ¾”. I don’t see why I couldn’t get an honest 900 fps or more from that stubby tube. I welcome your comments before I hit the “buy” button.
On a totally unrelated note, when I was figuring out the dimensions of the swage dies for my .308 as I spoke with Dave Corbin some years ago, the idea was to keep the bullet design balanced, that is, half nose and half body. Out of curiosity I applied that philosophy to the design of the above-mentioned boolit and by adjusting the requested weight and meplat percentage, I was able to get the nose section length to within .003” of the length of the body section. This created a problem as I noticed Dan’s software warning me of “the dreaded shrunken bullet syndrome” which ostensibly yields poorly filled out boolits. Apparently the nose has to be shorter. I have gotten poorly filled out boolits before but corrected the problem by heating the mould and or alloy to a higher temp and by cleaning vent lines as well as degreasing the mould.
I’m not trying to get a mould like this made. I was just curious as to what would happen in terms of accuracy with a balanced lead boolit if someone would care to comment. The Loverin designs were remarkable in that they all had a long bearing surface and a stubby nose and that is kind of what I was trying to accomplish with the first design I mentioned.
Paul
I was just toying with the bullet mould design software at mountainmolds.com, trying to come up with a good, short-range .44 caliber defense boolit to be fired from a Smith 329 PD (only comes in 4 inch). I like the 300-grain weight range and the tangential ogive profile like the WFN’s and Lee’s 310-grain. I’m not trying to drill one-hole groups at 100 yards or anything like that. While I don’t enjoy being bludgeoned by guns, I don’t really mind recoil of this level since this isn’t intended to be a plinker either. I’ll load it up to a speed I can handle and stop there.
Right now it looks like a plain base WW bullet with a single lube groove for less hassle in the Star die I’m going to ask Buckshot to make, two driving bands, a .350 length nose and an 80% meplat. I could be convinced to reduce that to 70% for ease of loading via speedloader though. I think this is a really cool boolit but I’ve only shot standard designs up to this point so feel free to poke holes in my theories. I’m hoping that at the speeds I can expect to launch these boolits, they won’t fly like bumblebees. The software asks for a 1 in 27” twist and we all know Smiths have a 1 in 18 & ¾”. I don’t see why I couldn’t get an honest 900 fps or more from that stubby tube. I welcome your comments before I hit the “buy” button.
On a totally unrelated note, when I was figuring out the dimensions of the swage dies for my .308 as I spoke with Dave Corbin some years ago, the idea was to keep the bullet design balanced, that is, half nose and half body. Out of curiosity I applied that philosophy to the design of the above-mentioned boolit and by adjusting the requested weight and meplat percentage, I was able to get the nose section length to within .003” of the length of the body section. This created a problem as I noticed Dan’s software warning me of “the dreaded shrunken bullet syndrome” which ostensibly yields poorly filled out boolits. Apparently the nose has to be shorter. I have gotten poorly filled out boolits before but corrected the problem by heating the mould and or alloy to a higher temp and by cleaning vent lines as well as degreasing the mould.
I’m not trying to get a mould like this made. I was just curious as to what would happen in terms of accuracy with a balanced lead boolit if someone would care to comment. The Loverin designs were remarkable in that they all had a long bearing surface and a stubby nose and that is kind of what I was trying to accomplish with the first design I mentioned.
Paul