PDA

View Full Version : Is Russia looking at SVD replacement with a SCAR clone?



Artful
06-04-2016, 11:19 PM
https://www.gunsamerica.com/blog/russia-hints-svd-replacement-well-never-get-shoot/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=20160603_FridayDigest_32&utm_campaign=/blog/russia-hints-svd-replacement-well-never-get-shoot/

Russia Hints at SVD Replacement (That We’ll Never Get to Shoot)by MAX SLOWIK on JUNE 1, 2016

https://gastatic.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/0ZtRj.jpgLooking at this rendering it’s possible to make out a small port above the chamber. This may be what redirects gas from the gas trap system to the action. (Photo: TFB/Popular Mechanics Russia)

Russia’s Popular Mechanics has the story on a new, possibly SVD-derived potential Dragunov replacement. The SVD, or simply Dragunov, was the first successful semi-automatic designated marksman’s rifle and it has been in service for over 50 years–and it’s starting to show its age.
The proposed replacement rifle, the SK-16, is a sleek, modern carbine with a flattop rail for optics. The SVD uses the older side-mount rail for optics which are heavier, more complex and sometimes less stable mounting methods for scopes, a critical part of any designated marksman’s kit. The SK-16 also has a folding, fully-adjustable stock and free-floating handguard for improved accuracy.
It appears to have a barrel length in the 14- to 16-inch territory, much shorter than the SVD’s 24-inch barrel, and did we mention it is chambered for 7.62 NATO/.308 Winchester? This is a major departure from the Dragunov standard which fires the venerable 7.62x54mmR cartridge.
https://gastatic.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/sk-16-2.jpgThe SK-16 is certainly eye-catching, although the Dragunov will always have a special kind of class. (Photo: TFB/Popular Mechanics Russia)

There are a few theories to explain this since 7.62x54mmR is still a capable cartridge. Designed for the Mosin-Nagant rifle, 7.62x54mmR was originally expected to perform out to laughably-long range back in 1891, out to 2,000 meters or nearly 1.25 miles. Over time the cartridge has been modernized and is still in use today to good effect. So why change it?
One explanation is that there are few modern 7.62 NATO options produced domestically for Russian special forces. While there are AK-based 7.62 NATO/.308 Winchester options produced in Russia they have all the shortcomings of the Dragunov and none of it’s advantages. The SVD is not based at all on the original Kalashnikov pattern, it is an accuratized design with a short-stroke recoil system and milled steel receiver.
For Russians to get a modern semi-automatic 7.62 NATO/.308 Win. rifle, they have two options: import or innovate, and the Russian small arms industry has always favored innovation over importation. But there is an even simpler explanation for the move away from 7.62x54mmR–it’s a rimmed cartridge.
Unlike 7.62x54mmR, 7.62 NATO/.308 Win. use a rimless case which feed more reliably and offer higher capacities than the rimmed cartridge. It also opens up a lot of other options for more cartridges compatible with .308 Winchester cases. If you’re making a truly modern long-range carbine you might as well start with .308 Winchester, it opens a lot of doors without compromising on performance.
That’s not the only surprise with the SK-16. While photos of early prototypes clearly have gas piston systems,according to The Firearm Blog (http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2016/05/30/kalasnikov-concern-introduces-new-7-62x51-nato-sk-16-precision-rifle/), the current-production SK-16 uses a gas trap.
Gas traps use special muzzle devices that channel gas from the end of the barrel back to the operating system after the bullet leaves the barrel. These were used in early automatic firearm designs but largely discarded in favor of other gas operation systems because of gas trap reliability issues.
It sounds like Kalashnikov Concern developers Demyan Belyakov and Evgeniy Erofeev have overcome these problems to build a precision gas trap rifle. From the renderings it looks like the SK-16 channels gas back to a small port above the chamber which cycles the action. Gas trap actions stay locked until the bullet leaves the barrel so these could theoretically be very accurate guns if the system works.Not that very many Americans will be able to shoot one of these guns anytime soon. The SK-16 is a Kalashnikov Concern gun which means that due to sanctions, it cannot currently be exported to the U.S. Sanctions were put in place against Russia after the Russian annexation of Crimea last year targeting the Kalashnikov Concern specifically.
Even if Russia hands over Crimea today it would be a surprise if those sanctions were lifted. As Russian hostilities towards U.S. military forces continue and even increase in aggression (http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-is-meeting-with-nordic-leaders-to-talk-about-russias-aggression-2016-5), sanctions seem likely to stay in place for the long run.
But the rifle itself is interesting nevertheless, and we hope to at least see it in photographs if it does get adopted as the SVD’s replacement.

AbitNutz
06-05-2016, 08:08 AM
It's really interesting that the rifle will use 7.62x51 NATO.

Bigslug
06-05-2016, 09:53 AM
It's really interesting that the rifle will use 7.62x51 NATO.

Makes you wonder. The long adherence to the 7.62x54R as a sniping round undoubtedly has more to do with the million, jillion, bazillion belt-fed weapons they have in service chambered for the round than any pro or con inherent to its sniping capabilities.

For the job they need it to do, the Dragunov with upgraded optics will get it done. Hell, the old 91/30 with upgraded optics will get it done. For much the same reason we keep NOT replacing the M16, I don't see the Russians casually dropping the 7.62x54R just to give their sniping cadre a sexy new toy with a 20 round box that makes you struggle to shoot from a low prone. The other option - issue specialized weapons to specialized troops that fire specialized ammo; that happens to be ballistically identical (perhaps even a little inferior) to what they've had for 125 years - does not make much sense.

My prediction - flash in the pan.

AbitNutz
06-05-2016, 12:00 PM
Certainly it is easier to make a rimless cartridge like the 7.62 NATO to run and function through an automatic or even a bolt action. I suspect that it was case of not wanting to reinvent the wheel. It's a smart decision. We would never bow to being that practical. If the 5.45x39 was invented first and proved to superior in all the ways they measure superiority...there is no way the US would stoop to adopting it.