PDA

View Full Version : ALBERT BALL'S MAGAZINE RIFLE OF 1863 (Machinery, Aug 1916)



ohland
08-17-2015, 08:59 PM
Ball's Magazine Rifle

https://books.google.com/books?id=6n9NAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA1059&dq=falling+breech+rifle&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDwQ6AEwBjgyahUKEwjx9MbItbHHAhWFBpIKHXDaBwM#v =onepage&q=falling%20breech%20rifle&f=false

Machinery, vol 22, August 1916, pages 1057-1060

Albert Ball's Magazine Rifle Of 1863
A Chapter On Machine Tool Development And Rifle Manufacture
By Guy Hubbard*

THE machine tool business in the United States is unusually prosperous at present, due to the impetus it has received, both directly and indirectly, by the European war. The direct result of the war is shown in the boom in the manufacture of munitions, while the great increase in the production of machine tools, which are required in quantities by the munition makers in this country and abroad, may be called the indirect result. The conditions at present existing in these lines are considered unparalleled, and in certain particulars they are, but in many respects the same conditions existed in the North, especially in the New England states, during the Civil War. At that time the war was upon home ground, and production was hastened by a general desire for self-preservation and perhaps by patriotic motives; yet in those days, as now, fortunes were made in the mechanical industries. The town of Windsor, Vt., furnishes in its machine tool industry of today and that of fifty years or more ago a comparison of these two periods, and it is with the earlier of these that this article is mainly concerned.

Some years prior to the Civil War a gun shop was started at a point where the water power was abundant and about which Windsor, like many other New England towns, grew up. The organization of this gun shop gradually brought together a considerable company of skilled workmen, among whom were certain men having more than the usual amount of inventive genius. Through the efforts of these men the products of the concern became widely and favorably known at a time when more than a local reputation was rare. The extent of the reputation is shown by the fact that the Windsor rifle was a favorite among Kentucky hunters and it also armed the soldiers of Texas at the time when, as the "Lone Star Republic," she fought the whole of Mexico.

A famous product of the old concern was known as the "100-to-the-pound" rifle, the small-bore gun of its day and a general favorite among sportsmen and pioneers in the '30s. This rifle had a barrel of extraordinary length and shot a round bullet, one hundred of which weighed a pound, making it 0.36 inch caliber. A short man must have had some difficulty in ramming a charge into the long barrel, but it utilized the expansive energy of the powder to such a high degree that a light charge served to drive the bullet at high velocity, as the space for acceleration was great.

A system of rifling called the increased twist was applied to the rifle mentioned, this system being afterward discarded by gunsmiths as being a needless refinement. The greatest care was taken in the manufacture of the barrels for these rifles, and before they were passed by the inspector, each one was held toward, a window in order to determine by the distortion of the reflection in the polished interior whether the barrel was suitable for use or not. The writer has heard it stated that "Dave" Crockett was carrying one of these particular rifles when the coon came down, but does not wish to vouch for the truth of this. In these early days of gun manufacture, a great deal of the work was hand work, or, at the least, work which was partially done by hand, as, for example, chipping and filing, and the turning of metals in slow running speed lathes with hand tools, while threads were frequently cut by hand chasing, the accuracy depending upon the skill of the workman in the initial guiding of the chaser along the rest.

It was not long, however, before this gunshop began to design and build machines to do its work, many of these machines being of novel design which afterward proved very successful. By good authority, credit is given to these designers for the introduction of the shaper or crank planer (as it was then called), milling machines and profilers, disk grinder, and most important of all, the turret lathe. So successful was their machinery that other armories and machine shops both here and abroad began to buy it. For example, when the well-known Arm of Enfield in England began to manufacture rifles, the entire outfit of machinery was built at Windsor, Vt.

Thus it was that parallel to the gun business there grew up at Windsor a machine tool business which was destined to outlive its parallel and to come down to our own time as a leader in the field opened by the introduction of the turret lathe. The original Windsor concern was the root from which grew an extraordinary network of newer machine companies, some of which are now among the largest and best known in the United States. The influence of the industry at this point has been very thoroughly investigated by Prof. Roe of the Sheffield Scientific School.

The name by which one of the factories was known at that time was Robbins & Lawrence. Many inventions were made and developed by this concern, one of which was a five-shot pistol, patented in 1849. A description of this pistol was published in Machinery, May, 1912. At about this time Robbins & Lawrence built the Windsor Armory which was a large brick structure; this is still in a fine state of preservation and is now used as a power station, where the first "Stumpf Uniflow" engine to be installed in New England is in operation. While the armory was still under construction large contracts for army muskets were received from the United States government, with the result that the new shop became a very busy place. These muskets were smooth-bore guns of large caliber not unlike cylinder bored shot guns, though having heavy barrels designed to shoot solid balls, and one phase of their manufacture that may be of interest was the making of the barrels.

A musket barrel was made at that time of flat stock, somewhat thicker than the walls of the finished gun, this stock being forged up about a rod and its edges welded lengthwise along the barrel, just as old-fashioned wrought iron pipe was made. It is apparent that this weld needed to be perfect or the gun would tear open when fired; there were few men in the country who were expert enough to be trusted on this work, and there was just one man with this company who could do it. For this reason this particular workman received the then unheard of wages of $10 per day. He was also experienced in making the so-called "stub and twist" barrels used on the superfine sporting and target guns made up on special orders. The stock for these barrels was forged in a narrow strip from high-grade scrap (horse-shoe nails in particular), then wound spirally about a rod and the edges welded. When finished, these barrels presented a handsome mottled appearance, and because of the direction of the fibers were unlikely to burst.

A short time previous to the outbreak of the Civil War, Robbins & Lawrence became associated with a concern making the Sharpe rifle. This company met with business reverses of such magnitude that both concerns failed completely, which was a rather common occurrence at that critical period. When the Windsor Armory with its full equipment and power was put up for sale, E. G. Lamson of the Lamson & Goodnow Cutlery Co. purchased the entire outfit at a ridiculously low figure, the price that he paid for the machinery being its scrap value only. At this time the Civil War broke out and Mr. Lamson immediately discovered that he had purchased a veritable gold mine, for not only did he own a plant in readiness to manufacture the guns for which there was a prodigious demand, but he possessed also an excess of gun making machinery. From this excess machinery he cleared $83,000 in one year, which was more than the initial cost of the whole plant. $10,000 of this was realized from the bayonet room alone. He also set the armory in operation after having received heavy orders from the government, and after gas was installed for lighting, ran night and day shifts, employing nearly five hundred men.

At this time the standard army gun was being manufactured at a large profit, $17 apiece being paid for them in quantity; yet Mr. Lamson looked about for something better than the muzzle loading gun. This possibly incited Alfred Ball, a young mechanic in Mr. Lamson's employ, to bring forward his magazine rifle, which, viewed from a modern standpoint and in the light of future developments, was plainly an invention far ahead of its time. Mr. Ball obtained basic patents on his gun in 1863, the third year of the war, and steps were immediately taken by Mr. Lamson to manufacture it on a large scale.

146956

The construction of this rifle is shown in Fig. 1. Primarily it is a lever-action, breech-loading repeating rifle, using metallic cartridges carried in a tubular magazine beneath the barrel, and resembling quite closely the present-day repeating rifle in many of its features. It must be remembered that at this time the ready-made brass shell, the magazine principle of handling the shell, and the breech method of loading were all innovations, so that there were three improvements of prime importance in the Ball rifle. These guns were made in two types, one a heavy infantry rifle, 0.50 inch caliber, and the other a short and comparatively light rifled carbine, 0.38 inch caliber, designed for cavalry service. This latter model, while it was never put on the market, was preferred, I understand, by the designer. It was the good fortune of the writer to be able to borrow from Mr. Gridley one of the carbines, although specimens of both models are now somewhat rare; the following description is therefore confined to this type, the essential principles being identical in both models.

The Ball carbine shown in the illustrations accompanying this article has an over-all length of 37 ¾ inches and weighs 8 pounds. Nine of the rather chunky rim-fire cartridges may be carried in the magazine, which consists of a brass tube 16 inches long and ¾ inch in diameter, located below the barrel. This tube contains a pusher G to feed the shells, the pressure being exerted by a long coiled spring of steel wire. The spring was made from No. 22 wire (Birmingham gage used at that time), and when free is 28 inches in length, but compresses on full magazine into a space of 3 inches, so that considerable force is exerted in the range of movement of the pusher. In order to facilitate the loading of the magazine a pull-back rod projects like a ram rod beside the barrel and engages a projection on the pusher. This works in an L-shaped track soldered over a slot in the magazine, the pusher projection / traveling in this slot.

146960

Balls Magazine Rifle, disassembled

146961

Wayne Smith
08-18-2015, 02:44 PM
Yes, if you can make it more readable that what is there. That copy seems a little out of focus, don't know if that can be changed.

ohland
08-18-2015, 06:41 PM
When the pusher is drawn back, it is caught by a latch H at the end of the magazine and held so that the rod may be pushed in out of the way, and after the magazine is loaded the pusher is released by pressure on this latch. The brass rim-fire shells used in the Ball rifle were among the first prepared cartridges of the type now in use. They were similar to those used in the old Smith & Wesson 0.38 inch caliber revolver, and the writer believes the original cartridges were made by this company. Upon experiment it was found that dry ammunition gave trouble in the gun, so Mr. Ball designed a cartridge greasing machine which is used today in all cartridge factories, and this overcame the difficulty. The shells were loaded with 20 grains of black rifle powder and a round nose lead bullet of 150 grains, this combination having considerable stopping power at moderate ranges. The primer was composed of fulminate of mercury spun out into the rim of the shell.

The barrel of the carbine tapers from 1 to ¾ inch at the muzzle, making it amply heavy at the breech. It is bored to 0.38 inch caliber and has five grooves broached through it, these grooves having a uniform lead of 30 inches to the helix. The barrel was made from a steel forging and the breech frame was shrunk onto it. This frame is a drop-forging of intricate pattern, its interior being milled out to contain and guide the loading mechanism, and its wearing surfaces bushed with hardened tool steel. The wooden parts, stock and magazine cover are of black walnut and were turned to shape in a gun stock lathe; the recesses in them were cut by fast running end-mills or burrs.

146957

Fig. 2 shows the general appearance of the assembled Ball carbine. In order to Indicate as clearly as possible the internal mechanism of the gun, the sectional assembly drawing shown at the upper left-hand portion of Fig. 1 is revolved upward through an angle of 180 degrees, so that the projection shows it bottom side up and inside out in order to show its position in relation to the loading mechanism. In order to explain the working of the Ball gun, the process for a complete cycle of operations is indicated herewith, reference being made to the illustrations accompanying the article.

Details of Rifle Manipulation
1. Gun empty, full cock, and magazine open. Pull back magazine spring by rod projecting at end of magazine (not shown) until pusher is caught by latch. Then push rod back, drop cartridges into magazine through gate, bullets facing front. When full, release spring by pressing latch, which causes first shell to be pushed out of magazine, whence it is guided by the trough into the breech-block, where it is held in place by the forward and downward pressure of the ejector upon it. See Fig. 3.

146958

2. Magazine lever is started upward. Front end of breech block begins to swing upward, being pivoted to short arm of magazine lever, while rear end is guided upward and forward by flat cam on frame. Ejector forced back by pressure of shell against curved arm; locking block pushed upward against frame by flat spring on lock plate. Guide trough pivoted to under side of short arm of magazine lever, tips up, holds back second- shell, and slides beneath mouth of magazine.

3. Movement of magazine lever is completed. Ejector is pushed completely back and nose of bullet enters chamber of barrel. Locking block drops into place behind shoulder and is held in place by spring, thus locking breech. Breech-block is now part of chamber and covers magazine gate. Shell is locked on chamber with small part of rim exposed to blow from firing pin on edge of hammer face.

4. Trigger is pulled. Heel of trigger bears upward against long lever arm on pivoted dog on lock plate. Edge of short arm of dog slips out of notch in ratchet block integral with hammer, and ratchet block is revolved about 30 degrees by opening of double flat spring connected to it off center by link. This causes hammer to fall, exploding cartridge, while at the same time locking cam fastened to ratchet block is thrown up beneath locking block, causing positive locking of breech at instant of explosion. Release hook on breech spring slide, operated by turning of ratchet block, also snaps above locking block. Fig. 4 shows position of receiver mechanism at this stage in cycle.

146959

5. Gun is cocked. Ratchet block turns back and edge of dog drops into notches, first that for half cocking, then that for full cocking, where it is held. At the same time locking cam is withdrawn and release hook pulled down locking block, unlocking loading mechanism.

6. Magazine lever is thrown down. As breech-block recedes, shell is withdrawn from chamber and magazine gate opens. Ejector suddenly slips off corner of breech-block and snaps empty shell out through gate. As breech-block comes back to starting point, guide trough is drawn into place and second shell moves into position. This completes the cycle.

Although this cycle of operations takes some time to describe, it is quickly done, and the gun may be fired as fast as the lever can be worked and the trigger pulled, the 0.50 inch caliber barrel sometimes becoming too hot to hold, while the effect upon the shoulder of the operator is like the pound of a pneumatic hammer. The action of the Ball gun must also have been somewhat disconcerting to the men at the other end who were armed with single-shot muzzle loaders at this time. When it was desired, this rifle could be used as a single-shot breech loader, by inserting the magazine cut-off, a pin set across the mouth of the magazine to hold back the shells, and putting the cartridges directly into the breech-block.

After tests had been carried out upon the Ball gun and its practicability as a service arm demonstrated, the Federal government became interested and preparations for its manufacture in quantities were hastened. The tests as conducted by government officials stationed at the armory were, to say the least, somewhat rigorous, the test of barrels in particular being very severe. Before the guns were assembled, a long row of barrels, loaded with double charges of powder and balls, was set in a rack in a sort of "bomb-proof" room, the muzzles directed toward a sand bank. All the charges were then fired at once by a train of powder touched off from outside, the resulting roar being heard all over the town. The barrels which survived this test were again tested by regular loads to reveal any weaknesses developed by the first trial. The inside of the bomb-proof room was well studded with pieces of burst barrels after many of these tests had been made.

A further test was occasionally given by selecting a sample from among the finished guns, this being buried in a mixture of salt, iron-chips and wet earth, to be exhumed later and tested to determine whether it was still in working order. In those days an ordinary gun consisted of "lock, stock and barrel," so that it is not surprising that experts were rather skeptical in regard to the complicated Ball repeater. As the interchangeable system of manufacture was in force at this time at the Windsor Armory, a great deal of special machinery, as well as expensive Jigs and fixtures, was required before the new rifle could be made in any numbers. All these operations required both time and money, and when all was in readiness, $25,000 had been spent on special machinery and the year 1864 was nearly over. A contract was made with the Federal government as indicated by the nameplate on the gun. The wording on this plate reads: "E. G. Lamson & Co., Windsor, Vt., U. S., Ball's Patent, June 23, 1863."

Some of the special machines that were built for this rifle were deep drilling machines for boring barrels, rifling machines, drop-forging hammers and dies, gun stock lathes, and profile milling machines. It is known that some of these rifling machines are still in service at the factory of a well known maker of revolvers. The output of the armory was sufficiently great so that the Ball rifle might easily have proved to be a deciding factor in favor of the North, and, in fact, hundreds of these repeating rifles had already been made and they were just coming into use when the war came to an end. Thus it was that the whole thing went flat at this time and no more guns were wanted. Hence, cases of modern magazine rifles sold at ½ cent per pound, and many a Vermont hunter in the late '60s carried a gun like those in use by the hunters of the present generation. At the same time hunters in other sections of the country were still using "muzzle loaders" with the powder, ball, and percussion caps.

It now remained for Prussia with her "needle gun" to demonstrate in 1866 and 1871 what could be accomplished by the use of single-shot breech-loading rifles in warfare. The Ball repeater as an invention lay dormant for many years, but finally came to the front again as the Winchester repeater, and as such has a wide reputation. After the crash, the special gun making machinery all went into storage and finally was sold as junk, marking the end of the munition business at Windsor, Vt. The machine tool industry, however, did not die out in 1865, but after passing through many precarious years as the old Windsor Machine Co., the idea of the turret lathe bore fruit, and the concern now flourishes in a large and growing modern plant as the manufacturer of the "Gridley" automatic screw machine. The munition idea still persists in the minds of some people who recollect the past, and only a short time ago an old gentleman who was being shown through the shop looked over a single-spindle "Gridley" automatic and inquired which end of the spindle the shot was fired from, while another person asked, in regard to the multiple-spindle machine, how the four-barrel cannon was moved about on the field of battle.

Albert Ball, who invented the magazine rifle, has reached nearly the allotted "four score years and ten," and is still an active designer with the Sullivan Machine Co., at Claremont, N. H., and has been for many years the mechanical engineer of this concern. In addition to the magazine rifle, Mr. Ball has to his credit numerous important inventions in mining machinery, steam engines, air compressors, and allied machines. There is little doubt that he is one of the last of the Civil War period inventors worthy of note, and has more than held his own beside those of another generation. He is a living example of the truth of a statement made by an old time designer of machinery: "We of those days" (this man said, in reference to mechanics of years gone by) "were just as intelligent as you of to-day. We had little behind us, and built up, step by step, those things upon which you have learned unconsciously to depend. Without the foundation laid by us you could not build the intricate machines of the present day, but would yourselves be forced to lay foundations instead of building upon them."

The writer is indebted for much of the material contained in this article to G. W. Hubbard, who was a draftsman at the armory in 1853; G. O. Gridley of the National-Acme Mfg. Co., inventor of the "Gridley" automatic screw machine; Mack Mower, Frank Hall and M. Harrington, who have been connected with the Windsor shop

ohland
08-18-2015, 07:02 PM
https://www.collegehillarsenal.com/shop/product.php?printable=Y&productid=1254

This is a description of a Ball Repeating Carbine...

"The Ball Carbine was designed and patented by Albert Ball of Worchester, MA. Ball spent the 1850’s working for various Massachusetts based gunmakers, including Lucius Pond. Ball secured a patent for a breechloading, metallic cartridge carbine (#38,935) on June 23, 1863. The patent rights were subsequently purchased by E.G. Lamson of Windsor, VT, in order to produce the carbine. Lamson had been a principle of the firm Lamson, Goodnow & Yale (LG&Y), which had been organized in 1861 to produce rifle muskets on contract for the US government. Lamson, Goodnow & Yale had purchased the majority of the assets of the defunct Robbins & Lawrence Company (also of Windsor, VT), and as a result of the old Robbins & Lawrence P-1853 Enfield Rifle Musket contract from the Crimean War, had all of the tooling and machinery necessary to produce that model of long arm. L.G.&Y. became one of three firms (including Colt & Amoskeag) to produce the “Special Model” M-1861 rifle musket for the US government, a sort of Enfield / Springfield hybrid that had many Enfield-style features and was easier to produce on the machinery they already had. In 1864 Goodnow & Yale left the firm, and Lamson took sole control. It was at this time that Lamson began to actively seek contracts to produce breechloading metallic cartridge carbines for the US military. In addition to purchasing Ball’s patent rights, Lamson also purchased the patent rights to the Palmer bolt-action carbine. Lamson managed to secure contracts to deliver 1,000 of each of the patent carbines. Although both were originally to be produced in .44RF, the US Ordnance Department changed the specification in mid-stream, requiring the guns to be manufactured in .50 Rim Fire Government. The newly adopted .50RF Gov’t cartridge (in actuality the improved 56-50 Spencer) was an attempt by the Ordnance Department to standardize the caliber of self-contained cartridge arms, and reduce the number of specialized cartridges in service. Two sample Ball carbines were delivered to the Ordnance Department on January 17, 1865. With Ball now working as Lamson’s superintendent, the company proceeded to manufacture 1,000 each of the Palmer and Ball designs. None of which would be delivered before the end of the American Civil War. The 1,000 contracted Ball carbines were all delivered on May 14, 1865, only 6 days after General Robert E. Lee surrendered at Appomattox Court House. Of the total of 1,002 Ball carbines delivered, only the 2 sample carbines arrived prior to the end of the war. The Palmer carbines were delivered about 1 month later. The end of the Civil War meant that there would be no additional US military contracts for his designs, and that orders for martial arms were going to end abruptly. In 1868 Ball left the E.G. Lamson company (and the firearms industry) and went to work for the Sullivan Machinery Company of Claremont, NH. He lived until 1927 and received 135 design patents during his lifetime.


The Ball Carbine represented a sort of “improved” Spencer carbine. The Ball design used a tubular magazine, as did the Spencer, but it was mounted under the barrel of the gun, instead of in the buttstock. The 7-round magazine was loaded through the action, which was opened by lowering the triggerguard. This allowed the insertion of cartridges directly into the magazine tube under the barrel. The magazine was tensioned by a long spring, which had to be compressed and retained to allow loading. This was accomplished by pulling a long rod that resembled a cleaning rod, out from the forend of the carbine. When the rod was fully extended, the spring was compressed and was captured by a small catch at the end of the forend. Once the magazine was fully loaded, the catch was released and the spring tensioned the magazine to push the cartridges towards the action. Much like a Spencer, lowering the triggerguard opened the action, ejected a fire cartridge and allowed a fresh cartridge to be pushed onto the lifter. Closing the action chambered the round. As the action could only be opened when the carbine was cocked, it was now ready to fire. The Ball Carbine had a 20 ½” round barrel and a two piece walnut stock and forend. Like most cavalry carbines of the era, a sling bar and ring were mounted on the left side of the receiver. The barrel was blued and the receiver was case hardened, as were the triggerguard, hammer, and buttplate. The forend of the carbine was secured by a barrel band about mid-way between the receiver and muzzle, and with a combination barrel band/end cap near the muzzle, which contained the magazine spring catch mechanism. The spring compression rod, which extends below the lower right side of the barrel was left “in the white” and was not finished.


This particular Ball Carbine is in about FINE+ condition. The gun is 100% complete, correct and original in every way. The gun is mechanically excellent and all systems function as they should, including the action, hammer, trigger and magazine system. The gun retains about 60%+ original blue on the barrel, which shows some fading and light wear, and has blended with a lovely plum-brown patina. The receiver retains about 40%+ case coloring overall, with the right side of the receiver retaining slightly less color than the left side. The triggerguard and the buttplate both retain about 20% of their case coloring, mixed with a smoky gray patina. The metal of the carbine is almost entirely smooth throughout, with only the most minor patches of lightly scattered pinpricking present on the receiver and barrel, with the only exception being a thumb-sized patch of lightly oxidized surface roughness immediately behind the upper barrel band/nose cap, and some similar roughness around the muzzle. The muzzle of the carbine rates NEAR FINE and remains mostly bright with excellent, crisp rifling. The bore shows some lightly scattered pitting along its length, with more moderate pitting confined to the last 3”-4” nearest the muzzle. The reverse side of the receiver is clearly marked in 6 horizontal lines:

E. G. LAMSON & CO
WINDSOR, VT
U.S.
BALL’S PATENT
JUNE 23, 1863
MAR 25, 1864The carbine retains its original L-shaped aperture leaf sight which is graduated for 100 yards on the short leaf, and has a 400 yard aperture and a 600 yard notch on the longer leaf. These are simply marked 1, 4 and 6. The sight is also marked with a single S inspection mark. This same “S” is found on a number of small parts on the carbine. The original front sight is in place near the muzzle as well. The original sling bar and ring are present on the left side of the receiver. The buttstock and forend of the carbine rate about FINE overall condition and are very crisp and retain sharp lines. They are solid and complete without any breaks, cracks or repairs. As would be expected of a 150-year old military carbine, the gun does show some minor bumps and dings in the wood, the result of storage and light use after the war. The left wrist retains a very crisp and clear GGS script cartouche, the mark of armory sub-inspector George G. Saunders, who inspected arms from 1856-1870, including Colt Dragoon revolvers, M-1840 Foot Officer’s swords, and M-1860 Light Cavalry sabers.


Overall this is a really nice example of one of those scare late-Civil War carbines that just didn’t quite make it in time to reach the field. The Ball Carbine is a very interesting gun that shows some of the design refinements that occurred with metallic cartridge repeating arms during the American Civil War. Some of the features of the Ball, like the tubular magazine covered by a wooden forestock and the side action loading system for that magazine, would be improved upon and utilized in the M-1866 Winchester rifle and carbine. The Ball represented the 2nd generation of US repeating carbines, and would not be equaled again until the adoption of experimental bolt action repeating carbines during the following decade."

ohland
08-18-2015, 07:24 PM
Improvement in self-loading fire-arm US 38935 A - June 23, 1864
https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US38935.pdf


Improvement in magazine fire-arms US 45307 A - Dec 6, 1864
https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US45307.pdf

Improvement in self-feeding breech-loading fire-arm US 43827 A - Aug 16, 1864
https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US43827.pdf

Improvement in machines for lubricating bullets US 47784 A - May 23, 1865
https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/pdfs/US47784.pdf

Wayne Smith
08-20-2015, 05:35 PM
Thank you. Very interesting.

FISH4BUGS
08-24-2015, 07:50 PM
Being a both a New Englander and a gun history buff, I found this all very interesting. Thank you!
Donald